Vincent Arel-Bundock
@vincentab.bsky.social
I know you prefaced with: "if the slope is significant." I'm saying that's not always the case, so (a) there's a high risk these plots are misleading, (b) they focus our eyes on unimportant features, and (c) add basically no new information.
February 2, 2026 at 1:01 PM
I know you prefaced with: "if the slope is significant." I'm saying that's not always the case, so (a) there's a high risk these plots are misleading, (b) they focus our eyes on unimportant features, and (c) add basically no new information.
Counterpoint: they two points would be colored differently on a J-N plot but they are indistinguishable.
February 2, 2026 at 12:59 PM
Counterpoint: they two points would be colored differently on a J-N plot but they are indistinguishable.
Hard disagree github.com/vincentarelb...
February 1, 2026 at 9:44 PM
Hard disagree github.com/vincentarelb...
I wish I could speed more things than just code production. Like, say, IRB approval.
January 29, 2026 at 3:10 PM
I wish I could speed more things than just code production. Like, say, IRB approval.
FYI, broom-ified shortcuts: `modelsummary::get_gof()` and `modelsummary::get_estimates()`. Obviously, if your students use other `easystats` stuff, it's worth introducing them to the ecosystem, especially since they are doing the actual "work" here.
January 23, 2026 at 1:04 AM
FYI, broom-ified shortcuts: `modelsummary::get_gof()` and `modelsummary::get_estimates()`. Obviously, if your students use other `easystats` stuff, it's worth introducing them to the ecosystem, especially since they are doing the actual "work" here.
Thanks, that's very useful and interesting!
January 14, 2026 at 2:58 AM
Thanks, that's very useful and interesting!
hmm, can't think of a direct solution now, but it sounds pretty easy to achieve this by manipulating the draws a bit. I posted this minimal "solution" to the forum.
January 14, 2026 at 1:34 AM
hmm, can't think of a direct solution now, but it sounds pretty easy to achieve this by manipulating the draws a bit. I posted this minimal "solution" to the forum.
Yes, in principle, I think that should work. You are just missing: c()
January 14, 2026 at 12:51 AM
Yes, in principle, I think that should work. You are just missing: c()
very exciting stuff. Congrats!
December 24, 2025 at 8:05 PM
very exciting stuff. Congrats!
Oh yeah, I'm all in for validation and code review. Essential!
December 22, 2025 at 6:29 PM
Oh yeah, I'm all in for validation and code review. Essential!
I mainly use claude and codex from the command line, and gpt web interface.
December 22, 2025 at 4:45 PM
I mainly use claude and codex from the command line, and gpt web interface.
Have you tried other similar tools? Copilot is the one I use the least among them. FWIW, care about "correct" code, I code a lot, and can't imagine doing it without these tools anymore. (Not a fan of the dismissive language in the original post.)
December 22, 2025 at 4:41 PM
Have you tried other similar tools? Copilot is the one I use the least among them. FWIW, care about "correct" code, I code a lot, and can't imagine doing it without these tools anymore. (Not a fan of the dismissive language in the original post.)
I'm hoping they'll become better at continuous update. also, the new "Skills" feature in Claude (and similar elsewhere) might be useful. Developers could package docs, prompts, and instructions to guide LLMs.
December 21, 2025 at 3:09 PM
I'm hoping they'll become better at continuous update. also, the new "Skills" feature in Claude (and similar elsewhere) might be useful. Developers could package docs, prompts, and instructions to guide LLMs.
That's one primary motivation for marginaleffects.com !
December 21, 2025 at 3:08 PM
That's one primary motivation for marginaleffects.com !