Sean Hutchison
@voiceoffcamera.bsky.social
Epstein file distractions/excuses- ranked:
August 14, 2025 at 1:03 AM
Epstein file distractions/excuses- ranked:
I predicted the redaction of the Epstein files 9 months ago.
August 4, 2025 at 8:01 PM
I predicted the redaction of the Epstein files 9 months ago.
Even just turning over the “Democrats” in the Epstein files would be complicated by the fact that Donald Trump was a registered Democrat from 2001-2009 and is likely connected with many of them as well…
August 1, 2025 at 1:28 AM
Even just turning over the “Democrats” in the Epstein files would be complicated by the fact that Donald Trump was a registered Democrat from 2001-2009 and is likely connected with many of them as well…
A Class 1 or 3 Democrat senator (reelection in 29/31) should announce for 28 NOW
Use the early launch platform to call out Trump’s coverup of the Epstein files & pathological lying about Kaczynski
@rubengallego.bsky.social @chrismurphyct.bsky.social @warnock.senate.gov @michaelbennet.bsky.social
Use the early launch platform to call out Trump’s coverup of the Epstein files & pathological lying about Kaczynski
@rubengallego.bsky.social @chrismurphyct.bsky.social @warnock.senate.gov @michaelbennet.bsky.social
July 19, 2025 at 7:57 AM
A Class 1 or 3 Democrat senator (reelection in 29/31) should announce for 28 NOW
Use the early launch platform to call out Trump’s coverup of the Epstein files & pathological lying about Kaczynski
@rubengallego.bsky.social @chrismurphyct.bsky.social @warnock.senate.gov @michaelbennet.bsky.social
Use the early launch platform to call out Trump’s coverup of the Epstein files & pathological lying about Kaczynski
@rubengallego.bsky.social @chrismurphyct.bsky.social @warnock.senate.gov @michaelbennet.bsky.social
Trump’s doodles make Hunter Biden look like Pablo Picasso.
July 18, 2025 at 8:07 AM
Trump’s doodles make Hunter Biden look like Pablo Picasso.
Trump spent $8.4T the first term and we didn’t even get infrastructure.
Biden spent only $4.3T inclusive of COVID and infrastructure.
Every Democrat has been more fiscally responsible my entire life… except when Obama had to bail out the US after the 08 financial crisis under Bush.
Biden spent only $4.3T inclusive of COVID and infrastructure.
Every Democrat has been more fiscally responsible my entire life… except when Obama had to bail out the US after the 08 financial crisis under Bush.
July 17, 2025 at 3:58 AM
Trump spent $8.4T the first term and we didn’t even get infrastructure.
Biden spent only $4.3T inclusive of COVID and infrastructure.
Every Democrat has been more fiscally responsible my entire life… except when Obama had to bail out the US after the 08 financial crisis under Bush.
Biden spent only $4.3T inclusive of COVID and infrastructure.
Every Democrat has been more fiscally responsible my entire life… except when Obama had to bail out the US after the 08 financial crisis under Bush.
Republicans have claimed for years to be the party of financial responsibility
Then their $2 Trillion DOGE cuts became $1T, then only $150 Billion
Then they passed a spending bill exploding the debt & deficit another $5T
Now they want to cut interest rates when CC & student debt have peaked
Insanity
Then their $2 Trillion DOGE cuts became $1T, then only $150 Billion
Then they passed a spending bill exploding the debt & deficit another $5T
Now they want to cut interest rates when CC & student debt have peaked
Insanity
July 17, 2025 at 3:39 AM
Republicans have claimed for years to be the party of financial responsibility
Then their $2 Trillion DOGE cuts became $1T, then only $150 Billion
Then they passed a spending bill exploding the debt & deficit another $5T
Now they want to cut interest rates when CC & student debt have peaked
Insanity
Then their $2 Trillion DOGE cuts became $1T, then only $150 Billion
Then they passed a spending bill exploding the debt & deficit another $5T
Now they want to cut interest rates when CC & student debt have peaked
Insanity
To expand further, Trump v Anderson only determined a state could not unilaterally determine if Trump was ballot eligible. I believe there is a route to challenge Trump’s legitimacy via Congress or the courts here, and it focuses on who he pardoned, not his conduct on J6.
June 17, 2025 at 12:45 AM
To expand further, Trump v Anderson only determined a state could not unilaterally determine if Trump was ballot eligible. I believe there is a route to challenge Trump’s legitimacy via Congress or the courts here, and it focuses on who he pardoned, not his conduct on J6.
Since impeachment is unlikely till 26- another idea- Trump’s pardon of specific seditionists actually violated & invoked the 14th amendment, section 3 & Trump has been sitting in the office despite disqualification since Jan 20th, putting us in an ongoing constitutional crisis.
June 17, 2025 at 12:45 AM
Since impeachment is unlikely till 26- another idea- Trump’s pardon of specific seditionists actually violated & invoked the 14th amendment, section 3 & Trump has been sitting in the office despite disqualification since Jan 20th, putting us in an ongoing constitutional crisis.
To expand further, Trump v Anderson only determined a state could not unilaterally determine if Trump was ballot eligible. I believe there is a route to challenge Trump’s legitimacy via Congress or the courts here, and it focuses on who he pardoned, not his conduct on J6.
June 17, 2025 at 12:44 AM
To expand further, Trump v Anderson only determined a state could not unilaterally determine if Trump was ballot eligible. I believe there is a route to challenge Trump’s legitimacy via Congress or the courts here, and it focuses on who he pardoned, not his conduct on J6.
Since impeachment is unlikely till 26- another idea- Trump’s pardon of specific seditionists actually violated & invoked the 14th amendment, section 3 & Trump has been sitting in the office despite disqualification since Jan 20th, putting us in an ongoing constitutional crisis.
June 17, 2025 at 12:44 AM
Since impeachment is unlikely till 26- another idea- Trump’s pardon of specific seditionists actually violated & invoked the 14th amendment, section 3 & Trump has been sitting in the office despite disqualification since Jan 20th, putting us in an ongoing constitutional crisis.
To expand further, Trump v Anderson only determined a state could not unilaterally determine if Trump was ballot eligible. I believe there is a route to challenge Trump’s legitimacy via Congress or the courts here, and it focuses on who he pardoned, not his conduct on J6.
June 17, 2025 at 12:37 AM
To expand further, Trump v Anderson only determined a state could not unilaterally determine if Trump was ballot eligible. I believe there is a route to challenge Trump’s legitimacy via Congress or the courts here, and it focuses on who he pardoned, not his conduct on J6.
Since impeachment is unlikely till 26- another idea- Trump’s pardon of specific seditionists actually violated & invoked the 14th amendment, section 3 & Trump has been sitting in the office despite disqualification since Jan 20th, putting us in an ongoing constitutional crisis.
June 17, 2025 at 12:37 AM
Since impeachment is unlikely till 26- another idea- Trump’s pardon of specific seditionists actually violated & invoked the 14th amendment, section 3 & Trump has been sitting in the office despite disqualification since Jan 20th, putting us in an ongoing constitutional crisis.
To expand further, Trump v Anderson only determined a state could not unilaterally determine if Trump was ballot eligible. I believe there is a route to challenge Trump’s legitimacy via Congress or the courts here, and it focuses on who he pardoned, not his conduct on J6.
June 17, 2025 at 12:35 AM
To expand further, Trump v Anderson only determined a state could not unilaterally determine if Trump was ballot eligible. I believe there is a route to challenge Trump’s legitimacy via Congress or the courts here, and it focuses on who he pardoned, not his conduct on J6.
Since impeachment is unlikely till 26- another idea- Trump’s pardon of specific seditionists actually violated & invoked the 14th amendment, section 3 & Trump has been sitting in the office despite disqualification since Jan 20th, putting us in an ongoing constitutional crisis.
June 17, 2025 at 12:35 AM
Since impeachment is unlikely till 26- another idea- Trump’s pardon of specific seditionists actually violated & invoked the 14th amendment, section 3 & Trump has been sitting in the office despite disqualification since Jan 20th, putting us in an ongoing constitutional crisis.
Ain’t no rule says a dog can’t be Pope
May 7, 2025 at 3:10 AM
Ain’t no rule says a dog can’t be Pope
The rich owe more taxes because they own the burden of our national debt.
Did we not fight wars at the request of rich & powerful?
Did we not build roads for business owners to move product & profit?
Did we not bail out banks & industries that failed by rich men’s decisions?
Did we not fight wars at the request of rich & powerful?
Did we not build roads for business owners to move product & profit?
Did we not bail out banks & industries that failed by rich men’s decisions?
May 7, 2025 at 3:01 AM
The rich owe more taxes because they own the burden of our national debt.
Did we not fight wars at the request of rich & powerful?
Did we not build roads for business owners to move product & profit?
Did we not bail out banks & industries that failed by rich men’s decisions?
Did we not fight wars at the request of rich & powerful?
Did we not build roads for business owners to move product & profit?
Did we not bail out banks & industries that failed by rich men’s decisions?
Massive crowd at Berniechella 💙
April 13, 2025 at 4:54 AM
Massive crowd at Berniechella 💙
You know why Republicans use the color red?
Because that’s what they do to the economy.
Because that’s what they do to the economy.
April 8, 2025 at 10:49 PM
You know why Republicans use the color red?
Because that’s what they do to the economy.
Because that’s what they do to the economy.
A year of gains, gone. Poof.
Like that.
Not because of a global pandemic
Not because of a terror attack
But Because Trump is a moron who doesn’t understand macroeconomics
Like that.
Not because of a global pandemic
Not because of a terror attack
But Because Trump is a moron who doesn’t understand macroeconomics
April 8, 2025 at 10:47 PM
A year of gains, gone. Poof.
Like that.
Not because of a global pandemic
Not because of a terror attack
But Because Trump is a moron who doesn’t understand macroeconomics
Like that.
Not because of a global pandemic
Not because of a terror attack
But Because Trump is a moron who doesn’t understand macroeconomics
MAGA: Not even once.
March 15, 2025 at 2:15 AM
MAGA: Not even once.
“Centrist” Dems concede ground & argue from a weak place of norms & compromise
At least act like a Liberal/Progressive/Leftist, pull Republicans towards the center in negotiations, then compromise to where you actually want policy to land, the middle
Centrism ends up middle-right
At least act like a Liberal/Progressive/Leftist, pull Republicans towards the center in negotiations, then compromise to where you actually want policy to land, the middle
Centrism ends up middle-right
March 15, 2025 at 2:13 AM
“Centrist” Dems concede ground & argue from a weak place of norms & compromise
At least act like a Liberal/Progressive/Leftist, pull Republicans towards the center in negotiations, then compromise to where you actually want policy to land, the middle
Centrism ends up middle-right
At least act like a Liberal/Progressive/Leftist, pull Republicans towards the center in negotiations, then compromise to where you actually want policy to land, the middle
Centrism ends up middle-right
Don’t forget the F-35 that crashed on 1/28 also in Alaska
February 16, 2025 at 10:03 PM
Don’t forget the F-35 that crashed on 1/28 also in Alaska
When China marks up a map specifically for their country via the Nine-Dash line, it’s “controversial” or has “no legal basis”, but when Trump does it, it’s “making America Great Again”.
Gulf of America = Trump’s Nine-Dash Line
#GulfOfMexico #GulfOfAmerica
Gulf of America = Trump’s Nine-Dash Line
#GulfOfMexico #GulfOfAmerica
February 13, 2025 at 1:55 AM
When China marks up a map specifically for their country via the Nine-Dash line, it’s “controversial” or has “no legal basis”, but when Trump does it, it’s “making America Great Again”.
Gulf of America = Trump’s Nine-Dash Line
#GulfOfMexico #GulfOfAmerica
Gulf of America = Trump’s Nine-Dash Line
#GulfOfMexico #GulfOfAmerica