carl barxist
@vrunt.social
17K followers 670 following 7.7K posts
hi i'm vrunt. your online friend not a troll
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
vrunt.social
they're mad that i reappropriated the slut gnomes post as my own
vrunt.social
those expectations are wrong though. turn off the cartoons and look at the state of the world outside of insulated suburbs
vrunt.social
no i'm just not baring my ass about how people on the spectrum are innately bad
vrunt.social
its an expectation that privileged people have, it doesn't reflect reality.

you're clearly getting really really upset that anyone would ever disagree with your eugenics-friendly opinions on autism.
vrunt.social
that classic anti-narcissist defense: giving them lots and lots of attention.
vrunt.social
highlighted the part that shows what i am responding to instead of the unsolicited mental health diagnosis shit
Lady Tehilah
@ladytehilah.bsky.social
No, I don't believe in it lol they exist because everyone has expectations for how to interact in society. One expectation is that they will not be grossed out or brought to extreme discomfort against their will in public. In person, that is easy to remember. Online, it is not.
vrunt.social
you're specifically tying it to autism over and over again in a way you should re-examine
vrunt.social
who cares what you've diagnosed it as? the world is a rich tapestry of people misunderstanding each other. i'm sure you can find a Bluey episode about one if you try.
vrunt.social
we're talking about your incorrect assesment that people should not expect to encounter discomfort
vrunt.social
why are you so focused on someone else's neuroatypical status?
vrunt.social
because you clearly think their words should not have been commented on
vrunt.social
there are lots of uncomfortable things out there. see: local news, national news, global news, any piece of media not intended solely for children
vrunt.social
why was it weird? because you found it rude?
vrunt.social
unlike you i don't think there are immutable objective rules to social media conversations. the person did in fact comment and in doing so opened themselves up to further interaction.

if the question is "should the second person have commented if they didn't want their words to be public"? then no
vrunt.social
i dont know, real slut gnome heads know that person is a piece of shit
vrunt.social
i didnt comment on their discomfort i commented on you saying "if this was a real thing that happened it would be bad"
vrunt.social
no one invited THEM to comment! thats the point! it doesn't matter if theres an invitation or not! they showed up of their own accord and put themselves on display to voice their opinion rather than ignore/block/move on. they don't get immunity just because you personally agree with their opinion
vrunt.social
yes and if there was really a freddy kreuger that would be a major issue too. however, much like the hypothetical puppy (not baby) isn't a real animal being harmed, freddy kreuger is also a work of fiction meant to shock and entertain
vrunt.social
right which is exactly why saying "no one invited you" makes no sense here. thats just how posting and replying in a public space works. if you choose to scribble over the graffiti, your scribble is now on display too
vrunt.social
it isn't a joke about that tho.

its a critique of a politician's willingness to abandon morals for a chance at power, using a visceral description of exaggerated violence. provocative by design.

if it was a joke there would be a punchline, and a normal response from someone upset isn't to engage.
vrunt.social
that account doesn't exist. its made up
vrunt.social
えー、すごい! 違いがわかるんだね?
vrunt.social
nope its a vrunt original. always has been in fact
vrunt.social
and they use this bark to confront people who are not talking to them?