But again, we both are probably happy to live where we live. The only reason I commented is that this „pimmel“/dick example is just a misuse of a politician that got rejected by courts. One person got raided because of it, not „you will get raided for saying dick“, that’s silly

And that’s the line where Germany differs. We don’t want people to yell at you „all Americans must die in gas chambers“. And, to be frank, let me guess we are both white male, that are rarely the target of this direct, vile hate.

No, you may be civil liable though, damaged reputation, but I think that’s the same in the US?

Sorry, „Not be held accountable“ I mean

Of course it is important. If you say „kill all Jews“ or „I hope you get gang raped until you die“, why should you be held accountable for your hate? I can see there is a cultural divide on that topic, but I just wanted to point out that nobody goes to jail for saying „dick“ in Germany..

What?

I speak about German law. Since World War Two a couple of things are just forbidden, that are very fashionable in the United States. See my other post about the German legal definition..

The most cases of hate speech are those calling for violence against ethnic, religious or other groups. I understand that this is allowed in the United States. We can see women breasts on TV though. Not defending extreme interpretations of the law or misuse, but it’s not a daily issue..

Well, hate speech is in some cases criminal. The „pimmel“ example 100% is not criminal. I don’t have 60 minutes to watch it, but if that’s the claim, it’s nonsense..

He spreads lies about other countries and normalizes it by being not challenged on it..

The information about Germany is so blatantly wrong. It was a big debate in Germany that a politician used his power to have police raid a person for insulting him. There was no legal reason and it was widely discussed, and just a single incidence. What you distribute is wrong information..

Und auf jede Allgemeinärztin die nur mit pkv Nachmittagen gerade eben so überlebt, kommt auch immer eine Fachärztin, die es sich schon ganz gut gehen lässt im „System PKV“..

Ich denke das ist enorm vereinfacht. Das System besteht aus Ärzteverbänden, Versicherungswirtschaft und diversen Lobbyverbänden, die allesamt für den Erhalt des PKV Systems kämpfen. Die einzelne Ärztin sieht das ökonomisch natürlich so, aber es gibt keinen Grund nicht das System anzugehen..

Und warum sind dann Privatpatienten die Lösung und nicht die eine gesetzliche Versicherung für alle, die die Ärzte angemessen zahlt? Bin auch Beamter und privat und effizient ist das System halt so überhaupt nicht..