The real lesson from The Emperor's New Clothes
wasn't that the emperor, or the system or the paradigm
was at fault
it was the people - for not realizing:
they were the ones who helped sustain the falsehood
by abdicating their own sovereignty
over their own:
- outer+inner eyes
- conception of reality
wasn't that the emperor, or the system or the paradigm
was at fault
it was the people - for not realizing:
they were the ones who helped sustain the falsehood
by abdicating their own sovereignty
over their own:
- outer+inner eyes
- conception of reality
November 5, 2025 at 4:36 AM
The real lesson from The Emperor's New Clothes
wasn't that the emperor, or the system or the paradigm
was at fault
it was the people - for not realizing:
they were the ones who helped sustain the falsehood
by abdicating their own sovereignty
over their own:
- outer+inner eyes
- conception of reality
wasn't that the emperor, or the system or the paradigm
was at fault
it was the people - for not realizing:
they were the ones who helped sustain the falsehood
by abdicating their own sovereignty
over their own:
- outer+inner eyes
- conception of reality
Wait till you learn about the 'Miracle of Worgl' AND its subsequent ban -- in the midst of the Great Depression
November 5, 2025 at 1:30 AM
Wait till you learn about the 'Miracle of Worgl' AND its subsequent ban -- in the midst of the Great Depression
I bet you have never heard of the 'Miracle of Worgl'.
It was banned to pave the way...
It was banned to pave the way...
November 4, 2025 at 6:14 AM
I bet you have never heard of the 'Miracle of Worgl'.
It was banned to pave the way...
It was banned to pave the way...
Thomas # 43.b:
... you have become like the Judeans, because
they love the tree (cause), they hate its fruits (its effect), or
they love the fruits (effect), they hate the tree (their cause)
... you have become like the Judeans, because
they love the tree (cause), they hate its fruits (its effect), or
they love the fruits (effect), they hate the tree (their cause)
November 3, 2025 at 4:55 AM
Thomas # 43.b:
... you have become like the Judeans, because
they love the tree (cause), they hate its fruits (its effect), or
they love the fruits (effect), they hate the tree (their cause)
... you have become like the Judeans, because
they love the tree (cause), they hate its fruits (its effect), or
they love the fruits (effect), they hate the tree (their cause)
Reposted
The sovereignty to cast one's own
- outer eyes i.e. look - here / there / left / right / up / down / closer / away. ..
- inner eyes i.e. attention and conception
is with the individual
Is it not?
- outer eyes i.e. look - here / there / left / right / up / down / closer / away. ..
- inner eyes i.e. attention and conception
is with the individual
Is it not?
November 2, 2025 at 6:48 AM
The sovereignty to cast one's own
- outer eyes i.e. look - here / there / left / right / up / down / closer / away. ..
- inner eyes i.e. attention and conception
is with the individual
Is it not?
- outer eyes i.e. look - here / there / left / right / up / down / closer / away. ..
- inner eyes i.e. attention and conception
is with the individual
Is it not?
The sovereignty to cast one's own
- outer eyes i.e. look - here / there / left / right / up / down / closer / away. ..
- inner eyes i.e. attention and conception
is with the individual
Is it not?
- outer eyes i.e. look - here / there / left / right / up / down / closer / away. ..
- inner eyes i.e. attention and conception
is with the individual
Is it not?
November 2, 2025 at 6:48 AM
The sovereignty to cast one's own
- outer eyes i.e. look - here / there / left / right / up / down / closer / away. ..
- inner eyes i.e. attention and conception
is with the individual
Is it not?
- outer eyes i.e. look - here / there / left / right / up / down / closer / away. ..
- inner eyes i.e. attention and conception
is with the individual
Is it not?
Thomas # 77b :
Chop a wood "I am" there
Lift a stone and you will find "I" there
bsky.app/profile/wall...
Chop a wood "I am" there
Lift a stone and you will find "I" there
bsky.app/profile/wall...
chopping wood
carrying water
lifting a stone
what you will find there
what they all have in common:
-> AGENCY
because:
the wood can't chop itself
the water can't carry itself (upwards)
the stone can't lift itself
each of these
becomes altered / elevated
only with AGENCY
else won't & can't
carrying water
lifting a stone
what you will find there
what they all have in common:
-> AGENCY
because:
the wood can't chop itself
the water can't carry itself (upwards)
the stone can't lift itself
each of these
becomes altered / elevated
only with AGENCY
else won't & can't
November 2, 2025 at 3:53 AM
Thomas # 77b :
Chop a wood "I am" there
Lift a stone and you will find "I" there
bsky.app/profile/wall...
Chop a wood "I am" there
Lift a stone and you will find "I" there
bsky.app/profile/wall...
Thomas #8 specifically mentions 'ⲀⲂⲰ' i.e. 'dragnet'
see:
(1): metalogos.org/files/th_int....
(2): archive.fo/C82Xf
A drag net is not the same as a cast net:
a cast net requires only one person to operate it
a drag net requires several people to operate it
see (3): archive.fo/AKEjE#select...
see:
(1): metalogos.org/files/th_int....
(2): archive.fo/C82Xf
A drag net is not the same as a cast net:
a cast net requires only one person to operate it
a drag net requires several people to operate it
see (3): archive.fo/AKEjE#select...
Thomas 8
metalogos.org
November 2, 2025 at 3:27 AM
Thomas #8 specifically mentions 'ⲀⲂⲰ' i.e. 'dragnet'
see:
(1): metalogos.org/files/th_int....
(2): archive.fo/C82Xf
A drag net is not the same as a cast net:
a cast net requires only one person to operate it
a drag net requires several people to operate it
see (3): archive.fo/AKEjE#select...
see:
(1): metalogos.org/files/th_int....
(2): archive.fo/C82Xf
A drag net is not the same as a cast net:
a cast net requires only one person to operate it
a drag net requires several people to operate it
see (3): archive.fo/AKEjE#select...
Any fisherman would know that
to catch only big fish easily without catching any small fish
-- use a bigger mesh size net
to catch only big fish easily without catching any small fish
-- use a bigger mesh size net
November 2, 2025 at 2:55 AM
Any fisherman would know that
to catch only big fish easily without catching any small fish
-- use a bigger mesh size net
to catch only big fish easily without catching any small fish
-- use a bigger mesh size net
The PROOF that Jesus was talking about 'conceptual sovereignty' is in the 'parables' in Thomas
-- ALL of them are stories with absurdities
they were meant to be retorted by the audience!
The audience's retorts prove their conceptual sovereignty
e.g. in Thomas #8, the fisherman was foolish, not wise
-- ALL of them are stories with absurdities
they were meant to be retorted by the audience!
The audience's retorts prove their conceptual sovereignty
e.g. in Thomas #8, the fisherman was foolish, not wise
October 31, 2025 at 2:50 AM
The PROOF that Jesus was talking about 'conceptual sovereignty' is in the 'parables' in Thomas
-- ALL of them are stories with absurdities
they were meant to be retorted by the audience!
The audience's retorts prove their conceptual sovereignty
e.g. in Thomas #8, the fisherman was foolish, not wise
-- ALL of them are stories with absurdities
they were meant to be retorted by the audience!
The audience's retorts prove their conceptual sovereignty
e.g. in Thomas #8, the fisherman was foolish, not wise
Also, to clarify: the word 'sovereignty' here refers to 'conceptual sovereignty'
Everyone has it - it's just a matter of how we use it, or not
In 'The Emperor's New Clothes' story,
the child who retorted, "but he has nothing on",
used his/her own conceptual sovereignty
whilst the emperor did not.
Everyone has it - it's just a matter of how we use it, or not
In 'The Emperor's New Clothes' story,
the child who retorted, "but he has nothing on",
used his/her own conceptual sovereignty
whilst the emperor did not.
October 31, 2025 at 2:15 AM
Also, to clarify: the word 'sovereignty' here refers to 'conceptual sovereignty'
Everyone has it - it's just a matter of how we use it, or not
In 'The Emperor's New Clothes' story,
the child who retorted, "but he has nothing on",
used his/her own conceptual sovereignty
whilst the emperor did not.
Everyone has it - it's just a matter of how we use it, or not
In 'The Emperor's New Clothes' story,
the child who retorted, "but he has nothing on",
used his/her own conceptual sovereignty
whilst the emperor did not.
"Eternal Life" ..
BUT:
- what would it look like?
- what role would one have in it?
- if one has little/no role in it, is one really living in the 'eternal life'?
- if one has a role in it, surely the present life is to prepare for it?
AND what if "Eternal Life" = Eternal Reincarnation on Earth?
BUT:
- what would it look like?
- what role would one have in it?
- if one has little/no role in it, is one really living in the 'eternal life'?
- if one has a role in it, surely the present life is to prepare for it?
AND what if "Eternal Life" = Eternal Reincarnation on Earth?
October 29, 2025 at 1:00 PM
"Eternal Life" ..
BUT:
- what would it look like?
- what role would one have in it?
- if one has little/no role in it, is one really living in the 'eternal life'?
- if one has a role in it, surely the present life is to prepare for it?
AND what if "Eternal Life" = Eternal Reincarnation on Earth?
BUT:
- what would it look like?
- what role would one have in it?
- if one has little/no role in it, is one really living in the 'eternal life'?
- if one has a role in it, surely the present life is to prepare for it?
AND what if "Eternal Life" = Eternal Reincarnation on Earth?
The original texts used
- Greek: βασιλεία (🔊 basileia)
- Hebrew: מַלְכוּת (🔊 malc-hut)
- Coptic: ⲙⲛⲧⲉⲣⲟ (🔊 mn-tero)
they were translated as
'Kingdom', instead of
'Sovereignty' for heaven in you
Mankind are born conceptualizers
We have Conceptual
Sovereignty = Power+Duty= Agency
for heaven on Earth
- Greek: βασιλεία (🔊 basileia)
- Hebrew: מַלְכוּת (🔊 malc-hut)
- Coptic: ⲙⲛⲧⲉⲣⲟ (🔊 mn-tero)
they were translated as
'Kingdom', instead of
'Sovereignty' for heaven in you
Mankind are born conceptualizers
We have Conceptual
Sovereignty = Power+Duty= Agency
for heaven on Earth
July 26, 2025 at 8:38 PM
The original texts used
- Greek: βασιλεία (🔊 basileia)
- Hebrew: מַלְכוּת (🔊 malc-hut)
- Coptic: ⲙⲛⲧⲉⲣⲟ (🔊 mn-tero)
they were translated as
'Kingdom', instead of
'Sovereignty' for heaven in you
Mankind are born conceptualizers
We have Conceptual
Sovereignty = Power+Duty= Agency
for heaven on Earth
- Greek: βασιλεία (🔊 basileia)
- Hebrew: מַלְכוּת (🔊 malc-hut)
- Coptic: ⲙⲛⲧⲉⲣⲟ (🔊 mn-tero)
they were translated as
'Kingdom', instead of
'Sovereignty' for heaven in you
Mankind are born conceptualizers
We have Conceptual
Sovereignty = Power+Duty= Agency
for heaven on Earth
LOL another humanoid bot
July 26, 2025 at 7:50 PM
LOL another humanoid bot
What Jesus really said:
conceptual sovereignty is in you: Thomas #3
Proof:
#1 The Emperor's New Clothes
ranking by conceptual sovereignty:
-the first: the child who told the truth
-the last: the emperor who sustained the BS
#2 The "parables" in Thomas are retortable
to demo conceptual sovereignty
conceptual sovereignty is in you: Thomas #3
Proof:
#1 The Emperor's New Clothes
ranking by conceptual sovereignty:
-the first: the child who told the truth
-the last: the emperor who sustained the BS
#2 The "parables" in Thomas are retortable
to demo conceptual sovereignty
July 26, 2025 at 2:49 PM
What Jesus really said:
conceptual sovereignty is in you: Thomas #3
Proof:
#1 The Emperor's New Clothes
ranking by conceptual sovereignty:
-the first: the child who told the truth
-the last: the emperor who sustained the BS
#2 The "parables" in Thomas are retortable
to demo conceptual sovereignty
conceptual sovereignty is in you: Thomas #3
Proof:
#1 The Emperor's New Clothes
ranking by conceptual sovereignty:
-the first: the child who told the truth
-the last: the emperor who sustained the BS
#2 The "parables" in Thomas are retortable
to demo conceptual sovereignty
Anon whistleblowers ask only that
people see+recognize for themselfs
Thomas 3:
ⲁⲗⲗⲁ ⲧ ⲙⲛ̅ⲧⲉⲣⲟ
rather the Sovereignty
ⲥ ⲙ̅ ⲡⲉⲧⲛ̅ ϩⲟⲩⲛ ⲁⲩⲱ
it of your inward part and
ⲥ ⲙ̅ ⲡⲉⲧⲛ̅ ⲃⲁⲗ
it of your 'eye'
coptic-dictionary.org/results.py?q...
"He who has an ear, let him hear"/consider
bsky.app/profile/wall...
people see+recognize for themselfs
Thomas 3:
ⲁⲗⲗⲁ ⲧ ⲙⲛ̅ⲧⲉⲣⲟ
rather the Sovereignty
ⲥ ⲙ̅ ⲡⲉⲧⲛ̅ ϩⲟⲩⲛ ⲁⲩⲱ
it of your inward part and
ⲥ ⲙ̅ ⲡⲉⲧⲛ̅ ⲃⲁⲗ
it of your 'eye'
coptic-dictionary.org/results.py?q...
"He who has an ear, let him hear"/consider
bsky.app/profile/wall...
July 19, 2025 at 6:35 AM
Anon whistleblowers ask only that
people see+recognize for themselfs
Thomas 3:
ⲁⲗⲗⲁ ⲧ ⲙⲛ̅ⲧⲉⲣⲟ
rather the Sovereignty
ⲥ ⲙ̅ ⲡⲉⲧⲛ̅ ϩⲟⲩⲛ ⲁⲩⲱ
it of your inward part and
ⲥ ⲙ̅ ⲡⲉⲧⲛ̅ ⲃⲁⲗ
it of your 'eye'
coptic-dictionary.org/results.py?q...
"He who has an ear, let him hear"/consider
bsky.app/profile/wall...
people see+recognize for themselfs
Thomas 3:
ⲁⲗⲗⲁ ⲧ ⲙⲛ̅ⲧⲉⲣⲟ
rather the Sovereignty
ⲥ ⲙ̅ ⲡⲉⲧⲛ̅ ϩⲟⲩⲛ ⲁⲩⲱ
it of your inward part and
ⲥ ⲙ̅ ⲡⲉⲧⲛ̅ ⲃⲁⲗ
it of your 'eye'
coptic-dictionary.org/results.py?q...
"He who has an ear, let him hear"/consider
bsky.app/profile/wall...
hey called Worgl "an experiment"
So that the Worgl Ban wouldn't be seen in a bad light
The People of Worgl attempted to survive on their own
AND they succeeded
What was banned: Self Agency!
BUT can Self Agency actually be banned?
So that the Worgl Ban wouldn't be seen in a bad light
The People of Worgl attempted to survive on their own
AND they succeeded
What was banned: Self Agency!
BUT can Self Agency actually be banned?
July 18, 2025 at 7:01 AM
hey called Worgl "an experiment"
So that the Worgl Ban wouldn't be seen in a bad light
The People of Worgl attempted to survive on their own
AND they succeeded
What was banned: Self Agency!
BUT can Self Agency actually be banned?
So that the Worgl Ban wouldn't be seen in a bad light
The People of Worgl attempted to survive on their own
AND they succeeded
What was banned: Self Agency!
BUT can Self Agency actually be banned?
Worgl was a watershed moment for Mankind
- Jul 1932 - Aug 1999: The Miracle of Worgl
- Sep 1933 - Present: The Worgl Ban
Had the ban been ignored, Earth would be Paradise today
- Jul 1932 - Aug 1999: The Miracle of Worgl
- Sep 1933 - Present: The Worgl Ban
Had the ban been ignored, Earth would be Paradise today
July 18, 2025 at 6:36 AM
Worgl was a watershed moment for Mankind
- Jul 1932 - Aug 1999: The Miracle of Worgl
- Sep 1933 - Present: The Worgl Ban
Had the ban been ignored, Earth would be Paradise today
- Jul 1932 - Aug 1999: The Miracle of Worgl
- Sep 1933 - Present: The Worgl Ban
Had the ban been ignored, Earth would be Paradise today
Knowing Thyselfs: Sovereign Co-conceptualizers T.3
=/= Know thyself: Introspection
He who wields sovereignty enriches self
Else, the little he has will be taken from him T.41
= 1933 Ban: Worgl conceptually re-colonized
not knowing their Sovereignty as Co-Rulers of concepts
bsky.app/profile/wall...
=/= Know thyself: Introspection
He who wields sovereignty enriches self
Else, the little he has will be taken from him T.41
= 1933 Ban: Worgl conceptually re-colonized
not knowing their Sovereignty as Co-Rulers of concepts
bsky.app/profile/wall...
Mankind:
Whoever knows the totality but lacks self
lacks totally T.67
Know Thyselfs to know+be known:
As Sovereign Co-Conceptualizers!
Else be self impoverished T.3
Co[re]conceptualizing restores you
Else be conceptualized T.70
Whoever wields sovereignty enriches self
Else be self deprived T.41
Whoever knows the totality but lacks self
lacks totally T.67
Know Thyselfs to know+be known:
As Sovereign Co-Conceptualizers!
Else be self impoverished T.3
Co[re]conceptualizing restores you
Else be conceptualized T.70
Whoever wields sovereignty enriches self
Else be self deprived T.41
July 18, 2025 at 3:51 AM
Knowing Thyselfs: Sovereign Co-conceptualizers T.3
=/= Know thyself: Introspection
He who wields sovereignty enriches self
Else, the little he has will be taken from him T.41
= 1933 Ban: Worgl conceptually re-colonized
not knowing their Sovereignty as Co-Rulers of concepts
bsky.app/profile/wall...
=/= Know thyself: Introspection
He who wields sovereignty enriches self
Else, the little he has will be taken from him T.41
= 1933 Ban: Worgl conceptually re-colonized
not knowing their Sovereignty as Co-Rulers of concepts
bsky.app/profile/wall...
A town in the midst of the Great Depression
did more than naval gaze
they executed their own recovery plan & it worked!
Others were ready to have their own Miracle of Worgl
But authority banned it
hardship & hopelessness returned: to Hitler's rise
Hardly anyone knows this
it's been Genesis 3:24'd
did more than naval gaze
they executed their own recovery plan & it worked!
Others were ready to have their own Miracle of Worgl
But authority banned it
hardship & hopelessness returned: to Hitler's rise
Hardly anyone knows this
it's been Genesis 3:24'd
July 16, 2025 at 2:22 AM
A town in the midst of the Great Depression
did more than naval gaze
they executed their own recovery plan & it worked!
Others were ready to have their own Miracle of Worgl
But authority banned it
hardship & hopelessness returned: to Hitler's rise
Hardly anyone knows this
it's been Genesis 3:24'd
did more than naval gaze
they executed their own recovery plan & it worked!
Others were ready to have their own Miracle of Worgl
But authority banned it
hardship & hopelessness returned: to Hitler's rise
Hardly anyone knows this
it's been Genesis 3:24'd
Deferring to authority
seemed the reasonable thing to do
in The Emperor's New Clothes
but the little child taught everyone
Sovereignty over one's 'eyes', is with the retorter
So too, the Gospel of Thomas' "parables":
the audience is supposed to retort them ALL
to prove Sovereignty over one's 'eyes'
seemed the reasonable thing to do
in The Emperor's New Clothes
but the little child taught everyone
Sovereignty over one's 'eyes', is with the retorter
So too, the Gospel of Thomas' "parables":
the audience is supposed to retort them ALL
to prove Sovereignty over one's 'eyes'
July 15, 2025 at 6:08 PM
Deferring to authority
seemed the reasonable thing to do
in The Emperor's New Clothes
but the little child taught everyone
Sovereignty over one's 'eyes', is with the retorter
So too, the Gospel of Thomas' "parables":
the audience is supposed to retort them ALL
to prove Sovereignty over one's 'eyes'
seemed the reasonable thing to do
in The Emperor's New Clothes
but the little child taught everyone
Sovereignty over one's 'eyes', is with the retorter
So too, the Gospel of Thomas' "parables":
the audience is supposed to retort them ALL
to prove Sovereignty over one's 'eyes'