@wallyanonymous.bsky.social
It's a tragic event that took her life at the hands of a law enforcement agent.
No one should lose their life for exercising their first amendment right to protest.
Yes, it's a shame that Ashli Babbitt lost her life on January 6, 2021
No one should lose their life for exercising their first amendment right to protest.
Yes, it's a shame that Ashli Babbitt lost her life on January 6, 2021
January 13, 2026 at 3:07 AM
It's a tragic event that took her life at the hands of a law enforcement agent.
No one should lose their life for exercising their first amendment right to protest.
Yes, it's a shame that Ashli Babbitt lost her life on January 6, 2021
No one should lose their life for exercising their first amendment right to protest.
Yes, it's a shame that Ashli Babbitt lost her life on January 6, 2021
Economics is a false science.
Diametrically positions are espoused by so-called professional economists.
Someone has got to be wrong.
Diametrically positions are espoused by so-called professional economists.
Someone has got to be wrong.
December 13, 2025 at 12:58 AM
Economics is a false science.
Diametrically positions are espoused by so-called professional economists.
Someone has got to be wrong.
Diametrically positions are espoused by so-called professional economists.
Someone has got to be wrong.
De mortuis nil nisi bonum
December 13, 2025 at 12:48 AM
De mortuis nil nisi bonum
Technically the tariff is paid by the U.S. importer, not the people.
The extra cost may be absorbed by the exporter, the U.S. seller, by the ultimate consumer or any combination.
The extra cost may be absorbed by the exporter, the U.S. seller, by the ultimate consumer or any combination.
November 8, 2025 at 9:23 PM
Technically the tariff is paid by the U.S. importer, not the people.
The extra cost may be absorbed by the exporter, the U.S. seller, by the ultimate consumer or any combination.
The extra cost may be absorbed by the exporter, the U.S. seller, by the ultimate consumer or any combination.
TDS is also a symptom of insanity.
November 2, 2025 at 7:25 PM
TDS is also a symptom of insanity.
Nobody is addressing the obvious: no tax money is used for the ballroom which is bequethed to the American people for not only this administration, but subsequent presidents of our country.
This is just another example of Trump cannot do anything acceptable to those who voted for Harris.
This is just another example of Trump cannot do anything acceptable to those who voted for Harris.
October 31, 2025 at 1:16 AM
Nobody is addressing the obvious: no tax money is used for the ballroom which is bequethed to the American people for not only this administration, but subsequent presidents of our country.
This is just another example of Trump cannot do anything acceptable to those who voted for Harris.
This is just another example of Trump cannot do anything acceptable to those who voted for Harris.
This is what they're really voting on.
October 31, 2025 at 1:02 AM
This is what they're really voting on.
What they're really voting for.
October 31, 2025 at 12:51 AM
What they're really voting for.
Donald Trump should be enthroned on a couch.
Because he's sofa king great!
Because he's sofa king great!
October 19, 2025 at 10:53 PM
Donald Trump should be enthroned on a couch.
Because he's sofa king great!
Because he's sofa king great!
Repost from X
x.com/javs2z/statu...
x.com/javs2z/statu...
x.com
October 19, 2025 at 10:18 PM
Repost from X
x.com/javs2z/statu...
x.com/javs2z/statu...
Donald Trump should be enthroned on a couch.
Because he's sofa king great!
Because he's sofa king great!
October 19, 2025 at 12:29 AM
Donald Trump should be enthroned on a couch.
Because he's sofa king great!
Because he's sofa king great!
And Bill Maher replied, "Fuck you!"
How rude!
Is that how civilized discourse is promoted?
How rude!
Is that how civilized discourse is promoted?
September 28, 2025 at 4:53 AM
And Bill Maher replied, "Fuck you!"
How rude!
Is that how civilized discourse is promoted?
How rude!
Is that how civilized discourse is promoted?
Isn't it strange how Charlie Kirk was accused of hate speech but the vitriol from Kimmel against the president and the republican party is OK?
September 23, 2025 at 4:39 AM
Isn't it strange how Charlie Kirk was accused of hate speech but the vitriol from Kimmel against the president and the republican party is OK?
ABC's decision to cancel Jimmy Kimmel Live is strictly business. The Late Show with Stephen Colbert drew more audience than Kimmel and Fallon together.
And the Late Show was losing $50 million a year.
How much was Kimmel's show costing ABC?
Besides, the affiliates demanded a retraction.
And the Late Show was losing $50 million a year.
How much was Kimmel's show costing ABC?
Besides, the affiliates demanded a retraction.
September 18, 2025 at 1:11 AM
ABC's decision to cancel Jimmy Kimmel Live is strictly business. The Late Show with Stephen Colbert drew more audience than Kimmel and Fallon together.
And the Late Show was losing $50 million a year.
How much was Kimmel's show costing ABC?
Besides, the affiliates demanded a retraction.
And the Late Show was losing $50 million a year.
How much was Kimmel's show costing ABC?
Besides, the affiliates demanded a retraction.
Explain to me as if I were a child why corporate stock buybacks, in anticipation of a rise in stock values so that the stock may be sold again (the main reason that corporations buyback their own stock) to fund new projects is somehow wrong or immoral.
August 12, 2025 at 11:50 PM
Explain to me as if I were a child why corporate stock buybacks, in anticipation of a rise in stock values so that the stock may be sold again (the main reason that corporations buyback their own stock) to fund new projects is somehow wrong or immoral.
They were trolling you.
August 10, 2025 at 5:19 AM
They were trolling you.
Seems like an oxymoron.
A conservative conserves.
The opposite (progressive, liberal, climate-change freak) would have the opposite effect.
A conservative conserves.
The opposite (progressive, liberal, climate-change freak) would have the opposite effect.
August 10, 2025 at 5:16 AM
Seems like an oxymoron.
A conservative conserves.
The opposite (progressive, liberal, climate-change freak) would have the opposite effect.
A conservative conserves.
The opposite (progressive, liberal, climate-change freak) would have the opposite effect.
Three out of four isn't bad.
August 3, 2025 at 2:18 AM
Three out of four isn't bad.
Check out the more comprehensive video.
youtu.be/dix4Rx1meng?...
youtu.be/dix4Rx1meng?...
Viral video of violent traffic stop arrest released by Jacksonville police sparks controversy
YouTube video by New York Post
youtu.be
July 24, 2025 at 11:50 PM
Check out the more comprehensive video.
youtu.be/dix4Rx1meng?...
youtu.be/dix4Rx1meng?...
What about him?
July 24, 2025 at 11:34 PM
What about him?
Murder has been commited since the beginning of man's existence, too.
So, does that legitimize it?
So, does that legitimize it?
July 15, 2025 at 6:57 PM
Murder has been commited since the beginning of man's existence, too.
So, does that legitimize it?
So, does that legitimize it?
Wouldn't it be great if Planned Parenthood provided all of those services for women except for abortion?
There would be no religious or government pushback and they would continue to have funding.
But, no, ideologically they make an imperative to kill unborn babies.
There would be no religious or government pushback and they would continue to have funding.
But, no, ideologically they make an imperative to kill unborn babies.
July 15, 2025 at 2:46 PM
Wouldn't it be great if Planned Parenthood provided all of those services for women except for abortion?
There would be no religious or government pushback and they would continue to have funding.
But, no, ideologically they make an imperative to kill unborn babies.
There would be no religious or government pushback and they would continue to have funding.
But, no, ideologically they make an imperative to kill unborn babies.
And how is the Democratic party any different?
June 21, 2025 at 11:54 PM
And how is the Democratic party any different?
He should have called him Alejandro.
June 21, 2025 at 11:53 PM
He should have called him Alejandro.
Is Bluesky just an anti-Trump echo chamber or does anyone want to address the elephant in the room - that the government with the overwhelming support of the electorate wants to deport those who entered the US illegally, especially those have broken other laws?
Is there no middle ground?
Is there no middle ground?
June 21, 2025 at 11:45 PM
Is Bluesky just an anti-Trump echo chamber or does anyone want to address the elephant in the room - that the government with the overwhelming support of the electorate wants to deport those who entered the US illegally, especially those have broken other laws?
Is there no middle ground?
Is there no middle ground?