@wanderingpath.bsky.social
You're right, they do also state that. I was interested in their opening statement though "no grounds for the claim that controlled burning 'causes biodiversity loss.'" - it's often the opening statement that people read as the take-away message. And that's a message I didn't see evidenced
December 12, 2025 at 9:08 PM
You're right, they do also state that. I was interested in their opening statement though "no grounds for the claim that controlled burning 'causes biodiversity loss.'" - it's often the opening statement that people read as the take-away message. And that's a message I didn't see evidenced
Your blog still repeatedly calls it a major scientific review despite the author Dr Heinemeyer saying that "It certainly is not a 'major review'..." I guess at some point you'll amend this?
December 12, 2025 at 1:45 PM
Your blog still repeatedly calls it a major scientific review despite the author Dr Heinemeyer saying that "It certainly is not a 'major review'..." I guess at some point you'll amend this?
That's timely - I happened to see this new NE report on Moor House yesterday: publications.naturalengland.org.uk/publication/... It says there's been over 1000 publications based on the site
Moor House – an outdoor laboratory - NERR156
Moor House was among the first National Nature Reserves designated in England in 1952. Over the past 70 years it has hosted an extraordinary amount of research work, resulting in over 1,000 publicatio...
publications.naturalengland.org.uk
November 6, 2025 at 9:58 AM
That's timely - I happened to see this new NE report on Moor House yesterday: publications.naturalengland.org.uk/publication/... It says there's been over 1000 publications based on the site
@andreasheinem.bsky.social has said about his paper that "It certainly is not a 'major review'..." Will you listen to the author and stop repeatedly calling it a major review?
November 5, 2025 at 8:38 AM
@andreasheinem.bsky.social has said about his paper that "It certainly is not a 'major review'..." Will you listen to the author and stop repeatedly calling it a major review?
"Controlled burning helps damaged heather recover faster..." Does it? That's not what the Heather Trust say. Has there been new research published?
October 15, 2025 at 2:31 PM
"Controlled burning helps damaged heather recover faster..." Does it? That's not what the Heather Trust say. Has there been new research published?
I don't think it's a secret, the Heather Trust website says it was Matthew Colston. www.heathertrust.co.uk/news-and-upd...
Charity’s “Big Day Out” to tackle the big issues affecting our uplands | The Heather Trust
www.heathertrust.co.uk
October 1, 2025 at 7:11 PM
I don't think it's a secret, the Heather Trust website says it was Matthew Colston. www.heathertrust.co.uk/news-and-upd...
It's good that 'A major scientific review critically examines' this issue and found the claim might not be true. It's just a shame that no-one thought to investigate it before...
September 25, 2025 at 7:44 AM
It's good that 'A major scientific review critically examines' this issue and found the claim might not be true. It's just a shame that no-one thought to investigate it before...