Seaver Wang
@wang-seaver.bsky.social
2.5K followers 370 following 1K posts
Director, Climate and Energy at the Breakthrough Institute. 王思維. He/him. Oceanographer turned solution seeker. Ecomodernism is the way. PhD in Earth and Ocean Sciences.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
wang-seaver.bsky.social
Should a US national critical minerals reserve program act more like the National Defense Stockpile or more like the Strategic Petroleum Reserve? Major new report by my team deep dives into this question, looking at 15 minerals relevant to energy.

My thoughts🧵:

thebreakthrough.org/issues/energ...
Taking Inventory of Critical Mineral Stockpiling
The Breakthrough Institute is an environmental research center based in Berkeley, California. Our research focuses on identifying and promoting…
thebreakthrough.org
wang-seaver.bsky.social
I certainly agree that's the current mood... Short-term I suppose the best hope is to code things as heavily AI/reindustrialization as possible, long-term just make sure good ideas are ready at hand...
wang-seaver.bsky.social
Shower thought: a special federally-supported engineering-procurement-construction task force for transmission line reconductoring? Traveling the country reconductoring lines, getting really good at it, bringing the cost down, and disseminating that knowledge to practitioners.
wang-seaver.bsky.social
Such alignment will push developers and technologists to pursue new generation locations, characteristics, and capabilities that fill the current gaps in our clean energy system problem-solving.

Check out my full piece here:
www.breakthroughjournal.org/p/its-time-t...
It's Time to Raise the Bar for Corporate Clean Energy Buying
Walking the walk on “100% clean powered”
www.breakthroughjournal.org
wang-seaver.bsky.social
Corporate sustainability is a bit silly, but we may as well align it with our key clean energy innovation + deployment needs. The GHGP2 standard should:
- credit all low-carbon power, not just renewables (nuclear and CCS deserve credit)
- require hourly + regional accounting
wang-seaver.bsky.social
“A California data center billing itself CO2-free by buying solar output in Wyoming that reduces some daytime Wyoming coal plant use is not catalyzing anything new. Deploying solar to provide midday power is at this point a solved problem—the lowest-hanging fruit.”
wang-seaver.bsky.social
“Symbolic accounting would only encourage companies to buy easy initial quantities of solar + wind around the world... When such strategies inevitably confront diminishing returns, failure to establish more versatile clean energy sources will come roaring back with a vengeance.”
wang-seaver.bsky.social
“if sustainability-minded companies are actually committed to decarbonization, they must incentivize clean electricity where and when it is most needed—in other words at the times of day when its marginal value is highest and in the regions where new demand actually resides.”
wang-seaver.bsky.social
In practice, the portfolio of capabilities to ensure round-the-clock clean power for a city, a university, or a steel recycling plant costs a higher all-in price.

Loose accounting + low-priced clean electricity certificates to satisfy green pledges = taking the easy way out
wang-seaver.bsky.social
But the energy transition's focus is shifting away from early deployment. Meanwhile, issues of inflated clean power certificates are emerging, with Norway for ex exporting several times the certificates as its actual power exports (33 TWh in 2024).

www.aib-net.org/facts/market...
wang-seaver.bsky.social
Say, eight years ago when renewable deployment was still ramping up, loose accounting was arguably forgivable with corporate PPAs being a major if not the major driver helping wind and solar projects break into most markets.
wang-seaver.bsky.social
Some firms like Amazon + Meta vocally support keeping loose accounting rules in place, with support of some renewable energy trade groups. Other companies like Google + Microsoft champion a “24/7” clean energy vision and favor hourly + regional matching.

heatmap.news/climate/scop...
The Obscure Philosophical Battle That Could Reshape the Clean Energy Economy
New rules governing how companies report their scope 2 emissions have pit tech giant against tech giant and scholars against each other.
heatmap.news
wang-seaver.bsky.social
The alternative to hourly + regional matching?

Loose accounting lets companies buy e.g. noon solar generation to claim "clean powered", when in fact doing 24/7/365 clean is *not* cheap/easy. This basically procrastinates key decarbonization challenges.

www.breakthroughjournal.org/p/its-time-t...
It's Time to Raise the Bar for Corporate Clean Energy Buying
Walking the walk on “100% clean powered”
www.breakthroughjournal.org
wang-seaver.bsky.social
New piece from me weighs in on the important brewing debate over corporate Scope 2 clean electricity crediting (GHGP2).

I argue that it’s obviously better for clean energy innovation to require companies to buy hourly and regionally-matched clean power to make green claims. 🧵
wang-seaver.bsky.social
At any rate, this exercise essentially originated from my regular Japanese news article reading practice coupled with a question in my mind re: the status of Japan's ongoing builds, so I may have missed some factors at play.

If so, please chime in and let me know!

END of thread 🧵
wang-seaver.bsky.social
One can't help but wonder if a greater sense of urgency could hit all the safety benchmarks while achieving restart + operation of idled + in-progress units faster.

If anti-terror facilities at Kashiwazaki-Kariwa is a holdup, for ex, why not just increase security presence?
wang-seaver.bsky.social
The last 3 units that have not applied for restart are Onagawa-3, Hamaoka-5, and Shika-1.

Overall, suffice to say that even accepting that all the new safety facilities are necessary, these regulatory and local govt approvals have been agonizingly slow.
wang-seaver.bsky.social
This all leaves 8 reactors that have not yet applied for restart approval, with 5 units comprising Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Units 1-5.

Local political negotiations currently stipulate that if Kashiwazaki-Kariwa 6+7 are restarted, at least some of Units 1-5 must be decommissioned.
wang-seaver.bsky.social
Lastly Tomari-3 in Hokkaido received approval at the end of this July to restart from the Nuclear Regulation Authority and aims to restart operation "as early as possible" in 2027.

7 units have applied for restart: Tsuruga-2, Tomari 1+2, Tohoku Higashidori, Hamaoka 3+4, Shika-2
wang-seaver.bsky.social
As of Jan 2023 regarding Japan's nuclear unit restarts, 10 units were operating.

Since then, 4 more have restarted:
- Takahama-1, Takahama-2 in 8/2023, 10/2023
- Onagawa-2 in 12/2024 (1st restart on Tohoku's east coast!)
- Shimane-2 in 1/2025
wang-seaver.bsky.social
In summary, of Japan's three in-progress nuclear builds:
- Shimane-3 has good prospects for restart. Targeting 2030 operation
- Oma has a risk of further regulatory/legal delays but is targeting 2030 startup
- Higashidori is starting almost from scratch and debatably in-progress
wang-seaver.bsky.social
Just over a week ago, Chugoku Power held press conferences to mark the release of their 2040 Vision Plan. Statements by representatives sound notably more confident than for the Oma project regarding Shimane-3's goal of generating power by 2030.

news.web.nhk/newsweb/na/n...
news.web.nhk