WeRateDAGs
banner
weratedags.com
WeRateDAGs
@weratedags.com
We rate DAGs.

(If you were hoping for dogs, try here: @weratedogs.com)
A trampoline DAG, as seen by someone who hasn't quite got the flipping-over part down. 12/10 because this is one of those cases when a fully connected graph is good, actually.
December 2, 2025 at 5:13 PM
An amazing fifty-part thread of DAGs and albums: 80/50.
December 1, 2025 at 11:55 AM
Today we have a mediated moderated suspension bridge, designed in the 90s and finally open. That mediator outcome arrow reinforcement probably increases future tensile strength but it's still a 2/10 because we can't encourage arrow-on-arrow crime.
November 12, 2025 at 10:23 AM
Continuing our drive to rate the classics, here are two maximally LA-coded suburban DAGs from Judea Pearl. There's thirsty lawns and sprinklers, burglars and earthquakes, and neighbors who call you if your alarm goes off.

9/10 because there's no mention of the traffic.
November 8, 2025 at 2:54 PM
Om nom 9/10 for this Neapolitan-style DAG, packed with new arrows and new toppings. We couldn't manage more than one though.
October 24, 2025 at 1:27 PM
Today, three adorable missing data DAGs. O* is missing when Rₒ masks it and O otherwise. Now, can we d-separate Rₒ and O?

12/10 Ten for the graphs, plus two for casually flipping "causal inference is a missing data problem"

From Mohan & Pearl (2021) "Graphical Models for Processing Missing Data"
October 19, 2025 at 2:46 PM
Conditioning on a match indicator S can generate collider bias exactly cancelling a confounding path and identifying the effect of Z on X. Here it is in a very good DAG.

9/10 because of the functional form specificity.

From Steiner et al. (2017) "Graphical Models for Quasi-experimental Designs"
October 18, 2025 at 12:16 PM
We couldn't not rate this classic early DAG by our beloved collective granddagy, Sewall Wright.

14/10. Ten for the DAG, plus one for each cute guinea-pig node.

From Wright (1920) "The Relative Importance of Heredity and Environment in Determining the Piebald Pattern of Guinea-Pigs"
October 17, 2025 at 1:36 PM
People sometimes ask why we want to rate DAGs. Couldn't we just rate statistical models instead?

We like to explain it with capybaras and bicycles.
October 17, 2025 at 12:52 PM
A palate cleanser: 'The causal structure of banana'. Robust, simply structured, and convenient. 8/10. The DAG is nice too.

This is the first of three bananadags in Hitchcock (2016) "Conditioning, intervening, and decision".
October 17, 2025 at 12:04 PM
Hello Bluesky!

We rate DAGs. Some are great. Some are... not so great. But we rate them all.

Let's start with a famous powerpoint hairball a.k.a. "the Afghanisdag", presented to Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal around 2010. His own rating?

1/10 "When we understand that slide, we'll have won the war"
October 17, 2025 at 11:45 AM