Sergiusz Wesolowski
@wesserg.bsky.social
Experienced Data Scientist, Enthusiast of unconventional data structures, Graph ML, Probabilistic Graphical Models and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (X AI)), and - more recently - quantum computing
Am I getting something wrong?
If understanding and causality are fundamentally independent of language — e.g. animals are fully capable of causal reasoning without it, then why are we trying to force these abilities out of large language models? Isn’t this approach misguided?
If understanding and causality are fundamentally independent of language — e.g. animals are fully capable of causal reasoning without it, then why are we trying to force these abilities out of large language models? Isn’t this approach misguided?
April 26, 2025 at 2:55 AM
Am I getting something wrong?
If understanding and causality are fundamentally independent of language — e.g. animals are fully capable of causal reasoning without it, then why are we trying to force these abilities out of large language models? Isn’t this approach misguided?
If understanding and causality are fundamentally independent of language — e.g. animals are fully capable of causal reasoning without it, then why are we trying to force these abilities out of large language models? Isn’t this approach misguided?