It is not only those with dual citizenship who are vulnerable but those deemed eligible to be a citizen of another state, whether or not they have ever wanted to be. Includes all Jews and most British born citizens of recent migrant heritage.
December 29, 2025 at 4:16 PM
It is not only those with dual citizenship who are vulnerable but those deemed eligible to be a citizen of another state, whether or not they have ever wanted to be. Includes all Jews and most British born citizens of recent migrant heritage.
Every time he breaks another norm or taboo, his support dips a little. But it usually mostly recovers again, and now the norm or taboo is no longer in place, so he has no further cost to pay when he breaks it next time.
December 4, 2025 at 8:41 AM
Every time he breaks another norm or taboo, his support dips a little. But it usually mostly recovers again, and now the norm or taboo is no longer in place, so he has no further cost to pay when he breaks it next time.
Coming from Germany, I have no particular preference to jury trials per se, but I see their abolition as part of two worrying trends: 1. Exclusive focus on cost-free/cost-saving measures to fix a struggling justice system 2. Removal of checks on government power
November 26, 2025 at 11:25 AM
Coming from Germany, I have no particular preference to jury trials per se, but I see their abolition as part of two worrying trends: 1. Exclusive focus on cost-free/cost-saving measures to fix a struggling justice system 2. Removal of checks on government power
It would be useful to see a detailed comparison of what Gill said (as a result of bribery) and what Farage said, on the same topics. It is perfectly possible he made broadly similar arguments from conviction, rather than for money, though they can be criticised as bad arguments.
November 21, 2025 at 3:15 PM
It would be useful to see a detailed comparison of what Gill said (as a result of bribery) and what Farage said, on the same topics. It is perfectly possible he made broadly similar arguments from conviction, rather than for money, though they can be criticised as bad arguments.