Opportunity missed 🙂
Opportunity missed 🙂
We can’t now access the tree, but by considering its image we can say interesting things about the tree, while recognising that discussion of the tree requires significant, speculative leaps. By contrast we’re on solid ground in talking about the image of the tree - in the end we have the text.
We can’t now access the tree, but by considering its image we can say interesting things about the tree, while recognising that discussion of the tree requires significant, speculative leaps. By contrast we’re on solid ground in talking about the image of the tree - in the end we have the text.
The fixer of the text (Homer, if you will) inevitably, like any painter, interpreted the object before him (tree/oral epic) i.e. made decisions about how to depict it, what would be included in or omitted from the canvas/text etc.
The fixer of the text (Homer, if you will) inevitably, like any painter, interpreted the object before him (tree/oral epic) i.e. made decisions about how to depict it, what would be included in or omitted from the canvas/text etc.
Love the tree analogy but have something to say about it that will require >1 comment 🙂
Here’s 1/n:
The Iliad as we have it today is less a tree, more an image of a tree. The development of our Iliad was halted at the time its text was (more or less) fixed.
Love the tree analogy but have something to say about it that will require >1 comment 🙂
Here’s 1/n:
The Iliad as we have it today is less a tree, more an image of a tree. The development of our Iliad was halted at the time its text was (more or less) fixed.
Part of my Head of Classics’ not so subtle plan to steer me away from modern languages and onto the true path ❤️
Part of my Head of Classics’ not so subtle plan to steer me away from modern languages and onto the true path ❤️
I’ll get my coat 🤦🏻♂️
I’ll get my coat 🤦🏻♂️
Might answer a few questions 👀
Might answer a few questions 👀