Leander & Burriss- Post 3
The post-human view unsettles the “reader/writer” binary. Maybe the future of literacy isn’t about individuals interpreting texts but networks generating meaning together. #edu800fall25 #Leander

Leander & Burriss (2020)- Post 2
Posthuman literacy reframes authorship: algorithms suggest, humans select. Where’s authorship’s moral center when agency is distributed? #edu800fall25 #Leander

Leander & Burriss (2020) – Critical Literacy for a Posthuman World -Post 1
Leander & Burriss push literacy beyond human agency readers become with machines. If AI co-authors meaning, can we still teach critical reading the same way? #edu800fall25 #Leande

Knobel & Lankshear (2014)-Post 3
Studying new literacies” might require new research literacies, too ethnography, discourse analysis, digital ethnomethodology. Are traditional research methods still adequate? #edu800fall25 #Knobel

Knobel & Lankshear (2014)- Post 2
They treat literacy as a social practice, not just skillset. That means studying context as much as content. How can we better capture the cultural meaning behind digital texts? #edu800fall25 #Knobel

Knobel & Lankshear (2014) -Post 1
Knobel & Lankshear’s idea of “new ethos” practices collaborative, participatory, remix-oriented redefines what counts as literacy. Does academia reward this ethos, or resist it? #edu800fall25 #Knobel

Leu & Forzani (2012)- Post 3
If "new literacies' are constantly emerging, perhaps education should shift from teaching tools to teaching adaptability. Meta-literacy might be the real 21st-century skill. #edu800fall25 #Leu

Leu & Forzani (2012)- Post 2

Leu argues literacies evolve as tech evolves but that assumes equal access. What happens when connectivity itself becomes a new literacy divide? #edu800fall25 #Leu

Leu & Forzani (2012) - Post 1
Leu & Forzani’s “infinite literacies” idea feels prophetic in 2025. With AI reshaping text production, are we witnessing the start of “Web 5.0 literacies”? #edu800fall25 #Leu

Mills (2010) -The Digital Turn- Post 3
Mills warns that we often study technology in literacy, not literacy in technology. That distinction hits hard. Does this mean are we framing digital learning as human-centered enough? #edu800fall25 #Mills

Mills (2010) -The Digital Turn- Post 2

The “digital turn” reminds me how research itself is shaped by tools. Are we, as scholars, also products of our platforms our citation managers, our databases, our feeds? #edu800fall25 #Mills

Mills (2010) – The Digital Turn
Post 1
Mills argues that digital literacies are never neutral—they carry social power. If literacy is always ideological, how should teachers handle corporate platforms shaping students’ voices? #edu800fall25 #Mills