witchescauldron
banner
witchescauldron.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy
witchescauldron
@witchescauldron.kolektiva.social.ap.brid.gy
@tantek.com @cwilso.com @w3.org

Not a bad ethical statement, but the whole process is lacking support for the thing that keeps it healthy https://hamishcampbell.com/w3c-how-this-fits-into-omn-the-shared-origins-and-intentions/
W3C How this fits into #OMN the Shared Origins and Intentions
Both the W3C statement and the #OMN recognize that the early web was built with open sharing, decentralization, and public good in mind. The #W3C calls for a web “respectful of all participants,” which aligns with the #OMN goal of building an open media infrastructure based on the #4opens: open data, open source, open standards, and open process. Where this W3C #mainstreamin alt path falls short (and why #OMN matters). The W3C vision speaks of “taking responsibility” and “addressing the impact of our work” through technical standards, but in reality, the current web’s architecture has been co-opted by centralized, profit-driven platforms (#dotcons) that dominate communication and content flow. In reaction to this, the #OMN is grounded in the reality that technical fixes alone won’t solve these social problems, we need working activist cultures, grassroots governance, and federated media networks to actively challenge #mainstreaming and #deathcult values. What #OMN brings is a social layer: W3C focuses on technology and ethics at the standards level. The #OMN focuses on the cultural and organizational infrastructure needed to build, sustain, and govern alternative media networks. Scaling what worked: The W3C admits we’ve lost the “openness” to misinformation and data abuse. The #OMN is about bringing back what worked (e.g., early Indymedia, radical tech collectives) and scaling it using tools like #ActivityPub and the #fediverse. Compost and regenerate: The W3C wants reform from within. The #OMN recognizes the need to compost the #techshit, grow anew, and create autonomous, federated spaces where community processes are native, not retrofitted. A positive reboot (from within the #openweb), where the W3C gives us a narrative frame. The #OMN gives us a path to act. We can reclaim the web not only through better standards, but through working, lived alternatives – composting what failed, and growing based on what we know works. We need bridging, if the W3C and groups like them are serious about rebuilding a humane web, then the #OMN path as much to offer: * A bridge to activist governance. * A working example of the Ethical Web Principles being practiced socially, not just technically. * A push for native, grassroots agency, not just safeguards built by the same #NGO centralizers who failed the first time. Let’s do better, yes, but let’s also be native, that’s what the #OMN is about. * * * ### Discover more from Hamish Campbell Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email. Type your email… Subscribe
hamishcampbell.com
July 30, 2025 at 8:04 AM
Reposted by witchescauldron
Trump’s post has more than 34k replies to it now (with that number still rising), and the ones I’ve read are…anguished, is the best word I can think of to describe them.

These are the top four responses:
July 13, 2025 at 12:56 PM