LightNews LightNews
wolvan73.bsky.social
@wolvan73.bsky.social
8 followers 14 following 9 posts
Posts Replies Media Videos
wolvan73.bsky.social
It's bad when Tom Clancys book "Debt of Honor" end scene starts to sound pretty reasonable.
March 14, 2025 at 2:24 PM
wolvan73.bsky.social
The MAGA will get upset.
March 3, 2025 at 4:03 AM
wolvan73.bsky.social
Ashamed at this point.
March 1, 2025 at 2:54 AM
Reposted
governorwalz.mn.gov
Elon Musk is a terrible president.
February 3, 2025 at 10:34 PM
wolvan73.bsky.social
www.theunpopulist.net/p/a-liberali...
A Liberalism Without Apology or Fear...
...which does not mean blindly defending the status quo and standing in the way of fundamental reforms
www.theunpopulist.net
January 23, 2025 at 10:01 PM
Reposted
kenwhite.bsky.social
Just a reminder: as a lawyer you don’t have to do immoral things for the client. You can quit.
chrisgeidner.bsky.social Chris Geidner @chrisgeidner.bsky.social · Jan 23
BREAKING, via The Seattle Times: Trump's executive order to restrict birthright citizenship is blocked for at least the next two weeks by a Reagan appointee in Seattle who eviscerated the Trump lawyers present defending the order. www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news...
Senior U.S. District Judge John Coughenour on Thursday was blistering in his criticism of Trump’s action as he granted a temporary restraining order that blocks Trump’s executive order from taking effect nationwide. “I’ve been on the bench for over four decades, I can’t remember another case where the question presented is as clear as this one is. This is a blatantly unconstitutional order,” Coughenour, an appointee of Ronald Reagan, said from the bench. “There are other times in world history where we look back and people of goodwill can say where were the judges, where were the lawyers?” Coughenour interrupted before Brett Shumate, a Justice Department attorney, could even complete his first sentence. “In your opinion Is this executive order constitutional?” he asked. Shumate said, “it absolutely is.” “Frankly I have difficulty understanding how a member of the Bar could state unequivocally that this is a constitutional order,” Coughenour said. “It just boggles my mind.”
January 23, 2025 at 8:18 PM
wolvan73.bsky.social
Triggering for some people, but I quite like them.
January 23, 2025 at 9:34 PM