Sorry about the time, it is the only time we had open for this. I’ll try to do another sometime soon that is more convenient for Europe.

I’m not able to compete with that.

Good point. I haven’t used swift in about 20 years that I can remember. I try to change to a new programming language twice a year, but I’m not able to keep up with the industry on that.

That seems almost mean. I don’t think my AI is able to cry, but I’m not sure I could handle it if it did.

Well, I’ve signed an NDA, so I can’t say anything. But it is for a firm whose name is not mineral or animal, and it rhymes with Snapple. Oops, I better delete that. Oh dang, I hit the reply button before I could delete it.

Yes. As you can see, I’m already taking steps way beyond the Ghibli attempts. I’m going for real emotion and depth. I’m pushing the boundaries and challenging the conventions. Can AI be stretched to the point of snapping? I’m getting close.

Poor AI really struggled with this one. However, I’m staring to get this prompting thing down both forwards and backwards. Mostly backwards though. You can at least see the signs of brain fatigue in my face. I had them blur out the code as it’s proprietary.

Yes. I’ll see if I can get AI to capture that nuance. It will be a challenge, but my prompting skills are really leveling up.

Sometimes my fingers feel like that after a serious day of code wrangling.

I had AI capture the dynamic excitement of me pair-programming with a friend of mine. After a lot of fine tuning the prompts, this is where we ended up. The smiles are a bit phony, but otherwise it’s quite accurate. It seems almost real.

It is my best thumb too!

I know you jest, but to be clear - it is a theory. The next slide: deliver software until the “customer“ becomes bored, shares my basic guideline. We discover the bits of the 20% as we go, and we just let things unfold as they will.