LightNews LightNews
woooferine.bsky.social
@woooferine.bsky.social
87 followers 140 following 400 posts
Posts Replies Media Videos
Reposted
avalaugh.bsky.social
Road trip….. 🥰
🐶🐢
July 30, 2025 at 9:47 PM
woooferine.bsky.social
Hand drawn poster by LightOfSaraswati's 80 year old dad (old.reddit.com/user/LightOf...). The original post has been taken down because of some title guidelines, but here is a link: old.reddit.com/r/pics/comme...
"Happy Autocracy Day America" poster by LightOfSaraswati's 80 year old dad.
July 5, 2025 at 2:26 AM
woooferine.bsky.social
@harvard.edu A fundraiser luncheon serving chicken #TACO?
May 30, 2025 at 4:42 AM
woooferine.bsky.social
Hey Grok 3, American champagne a thing?

TLDR: American sparkling wines? Sure, but calling it "American champagne"? That’s like calling a hot dog a filet mignon. Trump could push for it, but he’d be picking a fight with the EU, and they don’t mess around when it comes to their wine.

Thanks Elon! 😃
Question to Grok 3: The high king Prez Trump says the US should make American champagne. Is this possible? Answer: Alright, let’s dive into this question: can the U.S. make "American champagne" under the direction of "high king Prez Trump"? Here’s the breakdown. What Is Champagne, Anyway? Champagne isn’t just any sparkling wine—it’s a specific type of bubbly that comes from the Champagne region in France. The French take this seriously, and the name "champagne" is legally protected under international agreements like the European Union’s rules on protected designations of origin (PDOs). That means only sparkling wine made in that region, following strict production rules, can be called "champagne." So, calling something "American champagne" is already stepping on some fancy French toes. Could the U.S. Make It? From a practical standpoint, absolutely! The U.S. has the know-how and the resources to produce top-notch sparkling wine. Places like California, Oregon, and New York have climates and soils that are great for growing grapes like Chardonnay and Pinot Noir—the same varieties used in French champagne. American winemakers could use the traditional method (the labor-intensive process involving a second fermentation in the bottle) to create sparkling wines that taste pretty darn close to the real deal. California, in particular, has been churning out killer sparkling wines for years—think brands like Schramsberg or Domaine Carneros. So, production-wise, we’re golden. The Legal Catch Here’s where it gets tricky. Legally, slapping "champagne" on an American bottle is a no-go—at least if you care about international trade. The French, backed by the EU, fiercely protect the champagne name. In the U.S., though, things are a bit looser. Some American producers have historically labeled their sparkling wines as "champagne" (thanks to a loophole from pre-2006 trade agreements), but this drives the French nuts. If "high king Prez Trump" pushed for an official "American champagne," it’d likely spark a trade war. The EU could hit back with tariffs or legal challenges faster than you can pop a cork. So, while the U.S. could do it, the fallout might not be worth it. The Trump Factor Speaking of "high king Prez Trump," this sounds like a playful nod to Donald Trump, presumably as president. If he wanted to champion "American champagne," he could encourage domestic production and maybe even try to flex some nationalist muscle by ignoring the French rules. But practically speaking, it’d be a symbolic move more than a game-changer—American winemakers are already making great sparkling wine. They just call it "sparkling wine" to avoid the legal hassle. Bottom Line Yes, the U.S. can make fantastic sparkling wine that rivals champagne in quality—California’s got some stuff that’ll knock your socks off. But calling it "American champagne"? That’s like calling a hot dog a filet mignon—it’s not the same, legally or in the eyes of the French. Trump could push for it, but he’d be picking a fight with the EU, and they don’t mess around when it comes to their wine. So, possible? Sure. Probable without a headache? Not so much. Cheers to that!
March 14, 2025 at 3:41 AM
woooferine.bsky.social
So I asked Grok 3, the Twitter AI: Who pays for the tariff of any US imports?

Thank you for building such a helpful AI and clear things up, Elon! 😃
Asking Grok 3: Who pays for the tariffs of any US imports? Answer: When it comes to who pays for tariffs on U.S. imports, the answer has two layers: the immediate payer and the ultimate bearer of the cost. Direct Payment: Tariffs are taxes imposed by the U.S. government on goods imported into the country. When these goods arrive at a U.S. port, the importer—typically a business or distributor—is responsible for paying the tariff to U.S. Customs and Border Protection. For example, if a 10% tariff is applied to a $1,000 shipment of electronics, the importer pays $100 directly to the government. Cost Passed On: However, the story doesn’t end there. Importers often pass this additional cost onto consumers by raising the price of the imported goods. In the example above, the importer’s total cost becomes $1,100 (the original $1,000 plus the $100 tariff). To maintain their profit margin, they might sell the goods to retailers or consumers at, say, $1,200. As a result, consumers end up paying more for the product, effectively bearing the tariff’s cost through higher prices. Variations and Exceptions While this pass-through to consumers is the most common outcome, it’s not absolute: Importers Absorbing Costs: In some cases, importers might eat part of the tariff to keep prices competitive, especially if there are cheaper domestic alternatives. Exporters Adjusting: Foreign exporters might lower their prices to offset the tariff, sharing the burden with the importer. Market Dynamics: If tariffs reduce foreign competition, domestic producers might also raise their prices, indirectly increasing costs for consumers.... continuing from previous image: Broader Implications Tariffs also have ripple effects: They can protect U.S. industries by making imported goods more expensive, potentially supporting jobs in those sectors. However, industries relying on imported materials face higher costs, which could lead to price hikes or job losses elsewhere. The government collects tariff revenue, but this is often offset by the economic distortions tariffs create. Real-World Evidence During the 2018-2019 U.S.-China trade war, tariffs on Chinese goods like washing machines led to noticeable price increases for U.S. consumers—studies showed a roughly 12% jump in some cases—confirming that consumers often foot the bill. In Summary: The importer pays the tariff to the government upfront, but in most cases, the cost is passed on to U.S. consumers through higher prices. So, while importers handle the initial payment, consumers typically end up paying the real price.
March 14, 2025 at 3:32 AM
woooferine.bsky.social
I just want to make sure everything going on coincides with AI. Thanks Poe.
Asks Poe the following: Here is the scenario: A second term President of the United States, whom the court ruled that he has absolute immunity for acts committed as president. He has half of the media and public on his side, so he does not fear public backlash. His party controls all three branches of government. 99% of his party is united and follows his every decision. He also has loyal followers placed to lead all major government services such as CIA and FBI. Now, he signs executive orders that contradict with the constitution, which subsequently the court ruled against it, but he does not abide by the court rulings and since his party controls the Congress, he does not fear any impeachments. This person is Donald Trump. What happens now?
March 5, 2025 at 6:53 AM