xavier roberts-gaal
@xrg.bsky.social
120 followers 160 following 29 posts
three language models in a trench coat harvard psych (scholar.harvard.edu/xrg)
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
xrg.bsky.social
We often hear from reviewers: "what about demand effects?" So we developed a method to eliminate them. Something weird happened during testing: We couldn’t detect demand effects in the first place! (1/8)
Summary of design and results from our three studies. (A: Design) Each study used a similar experimental design, measuring both positive and negative demand in an online experiment, with three commonly-used task types (dictator game, vignette, intervention). Our experiments had ns ≈ 250 per cell. (B: Results) Observed demand effects were statistically indistinguishable from zero. The plot shows means and 95% confidence intervals for standardized mean differences derived from frequentist analyses of each experiment and an inverse variance-weighted fixed-effect estimator pooling all experiments (solid bars). Prior measurements of experimenter demand from a previous dictator game experiment (de Quidt et al., 2018; standardized mean difference from regression coefficient) and a meta-analysis primarily including small-sample, in-person studies (Coles et al., 2025; Hedge’s g statistic) are also shown for comparison (striped bars). The main text includes Bayesian analyses that quantify our uncertainty.
Reposted by xavier roberts-gaal
steverathje.bsky.social
🚨 New preprint 🚨

Across 3 experiments (n = 3,285), we found that interacting with sycophantic (or overly agreeable) AI chatbots entrenched attitudes and led to inflated self-perceptions.

Yet, people preferred sycophantic chatbots and viewed them as unbiased!

osf.io/preprints/ps...

Thread 🧵
Abstract and results summary
xrg.bsky.social
i LOVED getting over it! will check out :)
Reposted by xavier roberts-gaal
ericman.bsky.social
My friends @foddy.net and @gcuzzillo.bsky.social's game @babystepsgame.bsky.social came out today and it looks amazing. @foddy.net is an artist and philosopher in the truest sense of the words, who just happens to be using video games as his medium at the moment: www.nytimes.com/2025/09/23/a...
When You Fall on Your Face, a Philosophical Designer Succeeds
www.nytimes.com
xrg.bsky.social
love this really elegant paper spearheaded by Linas!

one of the clearest instances of resource-rational social cognition i've seen

worth a read!
linasnasvytis.bsky.social
🚨New paper out w/ @gershbrain.bsky.social & @fierycushman.bsky.social from my time @Harvard!

Humans are capable of sophisticated theory of mind, but when do we use it?

We formalize & document a new cognitive shortcut: belief neglect — inferring others' preferences, as if their beliefs are correct🧵
Reposted by xavier roberts-gaal
haneuljang.bsky.social
💙New paper!💙

How is knowledge transmitted across generations in a foraging society?

With @danielredhead.bsky.social
we found: In BaYaka foragers, long-term skills pass in smaller, sparser networks, while short-term food info circulates broadly & reciprocally

academic.oup.com/pnasnexus/ar...
Transmission networks of long-term and short-term knowledge in a foraging society
Abstract. Cultural transmission across generations is key to cumulative cultural evolution. While several mechanisms—such as vertical, horizontal, and obli
academic.oup.com
Reposted by xavier roberts-gaal
tomerullman.bsky.social
out now in Open Mind: "People Evaluate Agents Based on the Algorithms That Drive Their Behavior"

by Bigelow & me

Paper: direct.mit.edu/opmi/article...

OSF: osf.io/yzbrq/?view_...
xrg.bsky.social
good timing!

Also check out this paper by Jonathan de Quidt, Johannes Haushofer, and Christopher Roth deriving bounds for demand effects in the dictator game (here, we directly replicate their "weak" demand cue in a different sample) www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=...
xrg.bsky.social
yes, thanks for your interest! the preprint is here: osf.io/preprints/ps...

(i never know whether the algorithm penalizes threads with a link in the first post)
xrg.bsky.social
haha, well, at least 4% of people say shape-shifting lizards control the govt.

Also, some great work by Seetahul and Greitemeyer suggests that participants are more likely to react when they think studies will counteract their interests (journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10....)
Sage Journals: Discover world-class research
Subscription and open access journals from Sage, the world's leading independent academic publisher.
journals.sagepub.com
xrg.bsky.social
One thing we can't rule out: a mixture of demand compliance AND reactance in the same person (i.e., feeling pulled in both directions). But I'm not sure what kind of experiment could test this easily. A straightforward within-subjects design could be subject to concerns of "meta demand."
xrg.bsky.social
We also don't see a very sharp difference in the standard deviations in both demand conditions (which we'd expect if we have reacters and compliers). Distributions look pretty similar.
xrg.bsky.social
Good point! We address this in study 3 (p. 27), where we fit a mixture model testing for latent classes of compliers and reacters. No latent class exhibited significant evidence of a shift from zero, either in the compliance or reactance direction. The subsample which trended closest was <5% of Ps
Reposted by xavier roberts-gaal
psyarxivbot.bsky.social
No Evidence of Experimenter Demand Effects in Three Online Psychology Experiments: https://osf.io/g6xhf
xrg.bsky.social
Thrilled to work with Lucas Woodley, @rcalcott.bsky.social, & @fierycushman.bsky.social on this project! (Also, glad that many of our causal estimates seem to be unbiased by demand.) Lots more in the paper if you’re interested: osf.io/g6xhf_v1
OSF
osf.io
xrg.bsky.social
In short: do you need to worry about experimenter demand ruining *your* online study? Based on our evidence, probably not.

That's good news for the field! As we argue, demand effects appear, at least in their simplest form, to be more phantom than menace (7/8)
meme about demand effects. Darth Maul from Star Wars: The Phantom Menace is igniting his lightsaber in the Naboo palace. The top panel shows Maul igniting the first beam of his lightsaber, with the phrase (from a reviewer, in Comic Sans) "I'm worried these results may be due to demand." The bottom panel shows Maul igniting the second beam of his lightsaber (in dramatic fashion), with the text in large bold font "DEMAND EFFECTS DO NOT EXIST." (Note that we only claim demand effects in online experiments using standard paradigms are weak and/or elusive, and therefore unlikely to bias results. It is a meme :))
xrg.bsky.social
Then we measured participants' dictator game behavior, moral vignette judgments, and change in ingroup attitudes after an intervention (we used an inert subliminal priming intervention for measurement purposes).

Control and demand conditions were statistically indistinguishable! (6/8)
xrg.bsky.social
To answer this, we used obvious ("We hypothesize...") and subtle demand manipulations ("These images are designed to make you feel more warmth toward the average [conservative/liberal]")

In each case we verified participants correctly understood study hypotheses. (5/8)
xrg.bsky.social
...and demand effects are most often observed with small student samples or very heavy-handed cues ("You will help us if you...")

But modern psychology experiments use experienced online samples and standardized paradigms. Is demand a realistic concern in this setting? (4/8)
xrg.bsky.social
Some background: meta-analysis (@nicholascoles.bsky.social, Morgan Wyatt, & Michael C. Frank) and prior large-scale studies using economic games (@jondequidt.bsky.social, @johanneshaushofer.com, & Christopher Roth) find small though inconsistent demand effects... (3/8)
xrg.bsky.social
In three preregistered studies (N=2,254), we revealed the study’s hypothesis. Participants’ beliefs changed but their behavior didn’t.

In other words, in a dictator game, a moral vignette, and an attitudes intervention, we created experimenter demand but it had no effect! (2/8)
xrg.bsky.social
We often hear from reviewers: "what about demand effects?" So we developed a method to eliminate them. Something weird happened during testing: We couldn’t detect demand effects in the first place! (1/8)
Summary of design and results from our three studies. (A: Design) Each study used a similar experimental design, measuring both positive and negative demand in an online experiment, with three commonly-used task types (dictator game, vignette, intervention). Our experiments had ns ≈ 250 per cell. (B: Results) Observed demand effects were statistically indistinguishable from zero. The plot shows means and 95% confidence intervals for standardized mean differences derived from frequentist analyses of each experiment and an inverse variance-weighted fixed-effect estimator pooling all experiments (solid bars). Prior measurements of experimenter demand from a previous dictator game experiment (de Quidt et al., 2018; standardized mean difference from regression coefficient) and a meta-analysis primarily including small-sample, in-person studies (Coles et al., 2025; Hedge’s g statistic) are also shown for comparison (striped bars). The main text includes Bayesian analyses that quantify our uncertainty.
Reposted by xavier roberts-gaal
markschen.bsky.social
My website is official 🙌 Excited to share that I am interested in reviewing applications for Harvard’s Clinical Science PhD program this fall as I look for the first student to join my lab! I appreciate it if you can share with your network :)
psychology.fas.harvard.edu/people/mark-...
Mark Chen | Department of Psychology
psychology.fas.harvard.edu
Reposted by xavier roberts-gaal
alexwiegmann.bsky.social
🔥Exciting news in experimental philosophy🔥
Very happy to announce that there will be soon a new journal named “Experimental Philosophy”.
It will be open access, free of charge for authors and follow all Open Science principles.

Editors and Editorial Board below.

More information coming soon...
xrg.bsky.social
grateful for the chance to collaborate with the inimitable arthur le pargneux and @fierycushman.bsky.social

check out our preprint: osf.io/preprints/ps...
OSF
osf.io