I feel (and will be seeing) you; I'm the anthropomorphic personification of Death.
December 30, 2025 at 2:40 PM
I feel (and will be seeing) you; I'm the anthropomorphic personification of Death.
I appreciate the recognition that all the other allegations against Trump that Dems did weaponize were credible and true.
December 23, 2025 at 3:44 PM
I appreciate the recognition that all the other allegations against Trump that Dems did weaponize were credible and true.
There are so many Clinton trips in the data set 3 albums.
December 19, 2025 at 9:40 PM
There are so many Clinton trips in the data set 3 albums.
I mean, the only way we can be sure is to post the full transcripts of everything Wiles said during the interview. She's practically begging for it.
December 16, 2025 at 4:46 PM
I mean, the only way we can be sure is to post the full transcripts of everything Wiles said during the interview. She's practically begging for it.
Either something like that or vibe coding with Gemini.
December 15, 2025 at 2:27 PM
Either something like that or vibe coding with Gemini.
I was the shorts (sandals and t-shirts) guy in college but am a normal pants guy now. Eventually, I just got tired enough of people asking me if I was cold that I conformed. A tale as old as time.
December 14, 2025 at 8:40 PM
I was the shorts (sandals and t-shirts) guy in college but am a normal pants guy now. Eventually, I just got tired enough of people asking me if I was cold that I conformed. A tale as old as time.
No? The argument is that the judge needs to look at individuals to identify violations rather than assuming violations and the government has shown a high probability of irreparable harm if they try and do that after letting everyone go. A stay for appeal to SCOTUS is separate and common.
December 11, 2025 at 11:26 PM
No? The argument is that the judge needs to look at individuals to identify violations rather than assuming violations and the government has shown a high probability of irreparable harm if they try and do that after letting everyone go. A stay for appeal to SCOTUS is separate and common.
Good strong first names on 2/3s of the candidates though.
December 11, 2025 at 7:29 PM
Good strong first names on 2/3s of the candidates though.
Isn't the alternative that they're blind or disconnected? What experts believe it to be factual that we have a health democracy in the US today?
Plus, it's not like these are 9-year-olds. They're 18-to-29-year-olds, not children.
Plus, it's not like these are 9-year-olds. They're 18-to-29-year-olds, not children.
December 11, 2025 at 7:07 PM
Isn't the alternative that they're blind or disconnected? What experts believe it to be factual that we have a health democracy in the US today?
Plus, it's not like these are 9-year-olds. They're 18-to-29-year-olds, not children.
Plus, it's not like these are 9-year-olds. They're 18-to-29-year-olds, not children.
Okay, but you're not thinking about the risk of rich people having access to better medical care than poor people. Like Mark Cuban points out, that would be a grave injustice. The only way to keep healthcare available to everyone is to prevent everyone from obtaining healthcare.
December 11, 2025 at 2:09 AM
Okay, but you're not thinking about the risk of rich people having access to better medical care than poor people. Like Mark Cuban points out, that would be a grave injustice. The only way to keep healthcare available to everyone is to prevent everyone from obtaining healthcare.
Ah fuck. That one hurts.
Poor kid.
Poor kid.
December 10, 2025 at 7:45 PM
Ah fuck. That one hurts.
Poor kid.
Poor kid.
Well, if you click the little link in the post it brings you to a whole-ass story about it (and answers your question within the first 20 words).
December 10, 2025 at 4:19 PM
Well, if you click the little link in the post it brings you to a whole-ass story about it (and answers your question within the first 20 words).
It is a tough question in that I would really prefer not to have the administrative state destroyed in one fell swoop. But, I would also prefer not to have the complete power of the administrative state concentrated in Trump's hands. Maybe that those are the choices should tell the Court something.
December 9, 2025 at 4:23 PM
It is a tough question in that I would really prefer not to have the administrative state destroyed in one fell swoop. But, I would also prefer not to have the complete power of the administrative state concentrated in Trump's hands. Maybe that those are the choices should tell the Court something.
I didn't listen to the whole argument, but it reads like he is ostensibly trying to deal with the question of whether Congress would have delegated the power if it knew it couldn't limit removal, yeah?
December 9, 2025 at 4:23 PM
I didn't listen to the whole argument, but it reads like he is ostensibly trying to deal with the question of whether Congress would have delegated the power if it knew it couldn't limit removal, yeah?
One of the many things that is so crazy about these explanations is that this was the first strike. How would the sailors have any idea what hit them? No one even knew Trump had declared "war" on them, but they were trying to stay "in the fight"? What a disorienting and terrifying moment to live in.
December 5, 2025 at 11:26 PM
One of the many things that is so crazy about these explanations is that this was the first strike. How would the sailors have any idea what hit them? No one even knew Trump had declared "war" on them, but they were trying to stay "in the fight"? What a disorienting and terrifying moment to live in.
As long as you can avoid the dreaded "but you should still go," that is.
December 5, 2025 at 8:44 PM
As long as you can avoid the dreaded "but you should still go," that is.
Now that he has (as of a few hours ago) had his full control over the makeup of the MSPB blessed by the DC COA it's no surprise he wants to divert as much that direction as he can. Sigh.
December 5, 2025 at 6:37 PM
Now that he has (as of a few hours ago) had his full control over the makeup of the MSPB blessed by the DC COA it's no surprise he wants to divert as much that direction as he can. Sigh.
267 times and yet never quite made it to the end of your playlist.
December 3, 2025 at 10:32 PM
267 times and yet never quite made it to the end of your playlist.
Good luck winning any money on the bet though since the odds of a mass change in corporate policy to start paying a living wage are around 0.02%
December 3, 2025 at 10:30 PM
Good luck winning any money on the bet though since the odds of a mass change in corporate policy to start paying a living wage are around 0.02%
I think Shapiro using "basket of deplorables" as an example of how Democrats ignore rural low-income voters without acknowledging that the second half of the quote is about understanding and empathizing with rural low-income voters says a lot about him.
December 3, 2025 at 5:19 PM
I think Shapiro using "basket of deplorables" as an example of how Democrats ignore rural low-income voters without acknowledging that the second half of the quote is about understanding and empathizing with rural low-income voters says a lot about him.
Too foggy to be sure.
December 3, 2025 at 12:03 AM
Too foggy to be sure.
Dolphins! I knew it was them. Even when it was fishermen, I knew it was them!
December 3, 2025 at 12:02 AM
Dolphins! I knew it was them. Even when it was fishermen, I knew it was them!
And/or derailing any rebuilding/dismantling efforts post-Trump (whenever that may be) with it being used to justify Trumpism because "he kept us safe" or something. Akin to how Biden gets the sole blame for the Afghanistan withdrawal.
December 2, 2025 at 5:32 PM
And/or derailing any rebuilding/dismantling efforts post-Trump (whenever that may be) with it being used to justify Trumpism because "he kept us safe" or something. Akin to how Biden gets the sole blame for the Afghanistan withdrawal.
I know too many lawyer jokes to believe people ever really respected lawyers as a whole in my lifetime.
But, that's also part of my point. They are the kind of lawyer who operates in the gray space between the rules. With less gray space, such behavior is better contained.
But, that's also part of my point. They are the kind of lawyer who operates in the gray space between the rules. With less gray space, such behavior is better contained.
December 2, 2025 at 5:23 PM
I know too many lawyer jokes to believe people ever really respected lawyers as a whole in my lifetime.
But, that's also part of my point. They are the kind of lawyer who operates in the gray space between the rules. With less gray space, such behavior is better contained.
But, that's also part of my point. They are the kind of lawyer who operates in the gray space between the rules. With less gray space, such behavior is better contained.
That is indeed what he will argue. This is not my practice area so I cannot speak to how successful he will be. I know the govt may still reindict post-SOL if first indictment was returned by a null grand jury which seems analogous to me, but there may be more specific relevant case law out there.
December 2, 2025 at 5:15 PM
That is indeed what he will argue. This is not my practice area so I cannot speak to how successful he will be. I know the govt may still reindict post-SOL if first indictment was returned by a null grand jury which seems analogous to me, but there may be more specific relevant case law out there.