Bada Yang
@yangbd.bsky.social
Systematic review methods. Comparative test evaluation. Sources of bias in comparative accuracy studies. Assist prof @amsterdamumc.bsky.social
Reposted by Bada Yang
Obligatory blog post:
www.the100.ci/2017/03/14/t...
Elwert & Winship (2014) if you crave something more serious: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC...
www.the100.ci/2017/03/14/t...
Elwert & Winship (2014) if you crave something more serious: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC...
That one weird third variable problem nobody ever mentions: Conditioning on a collider
Scroll to the very end of this post for an addendum.<fn>If you only see footnotes, you have scrolled too far.</fn>
Reading skills of children correlate with their shoe size. Number of storks in an ar...
www.the100.ci
December 20, 2025 at 5:14 PM
Obligatory blog post:
www.the100.ci/2017/03/14/t...
Elwert & Winship (2014) if you crave something more serious: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC...
www.the100.ci/2017/03/14/t...
Elwert & Winship (2014) if you crave something more serious: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC...
Love these studies on quality/RoB tools. ROBIS focuses specifically on risk of bias, but wonder if that is more useful than the broader concept of 'methodological quality', when it comes to syst reviews.
July 15, 2025 at 8:41 AM
Love these studies on quality/RoB tools. ROBIS focuses specifically on risk of bias, but wonder if that is more useful than the broader concept of 'methodological quality', when it comes to syst reviews.
Reposted by Bada Yang
There is no journal of metascience, metascientists have made something better than a journal: metaror.org! ;)
Home - MetaROR
MetaResearch Open Review
MetaResearch Open Review MetaResearch Open Review
A new platform designed to transform how we review and share metaresearch
A new platform designed to transform
metaror.org
July 2, 2025 at 5:11 PM
There is no journal of metascience, metascientists have made something better than a journal: metaror.org! ;)