YetAnotherSteve
@yaseppochi.bsky.social
Aka yasegumi. Conservatively progressive devil’s advocate economist, Pythonista, wannabe mathematician.
Favorite meme ¿Porque no los dos? but rarely happy with either side.
Favorite meme ¿Porque no los dos? but rarely happy with either side.
And thank you for the compliment.😊
November 19, 2025 at 9:25 PM
And thank you for the compliment.😊
Sure. I just think that without an actual bribe involved I can’t get upset about the foreman doing what they’re told.
I agree that from what we’ve seen so far a fraud was perpetrated on the court, and Halligan, Blanche, Bondi, and the Loaner AUSAs are in a conspiracy to obstruct and pervert justice.
I agree that from what we’ve seen so far a fraud was perpetrated on the court, and Halligan, Blanche, Bondi, and the Loaner AUSAs are in a conspiracy to obstruct and pervert justice.
November 19, 2025 at 9:24 PM
Sure. I just think that without an actual bribe involved I can’t get upset about the foreman doing what they’re told.
I agree that from what we’ve seen so far a fraud was perpetrated on the court, and Halligan, Blanche, Bondi, and the Loaner AUSAs are in a conspiracy to obstruct and pervert justice.
I agree that from what we’ve seen so far a fraud was perpetrated on the court, and Halligan, Blanche, Bondi, and the Loaner AUSAs are in a conspiracy to obstruct and pervert justice.
Comey looks properly horrified. The parenthesis is 🧑🍳💋🤌🏻.
November 19, 2025 at 8:44 PM
Comey looks properly horrified. The parenthesis is 🧑🍳💋🤌🏻.
Agreed. See the PS at the very end for why I wrote it that way, if you care.
November 19, 2025 at 8:41 PM
Agreed. See the PS at the very end for why I wrote it that way, if you care.
And I’m saying he can’t be charged for collusion because he’s not expected to know what the rules are, and coercion is the coercer’s crime for the same reason.
It sure does seem like multiple crimes were committed by the prosecution, I’ll give you that.
It sure does seem like multiple crimes were committed by the prosecution, I’ll give you that.
November 19, 2025 at 8:38 PM
And I’m saying he can’t be charged for collusion because he’s not expected to know what the rules are, and coercion is the coercer’s crime for the same reason.
It sure does seem like multiple crimes were committed by the prosecution, I’ll give you that.
It sure does seem like multiple crimes were committed by the prosecution, I’ll give you that.
PS “No rule or precedent” doesn’t mean the judge can’t or shouldn’t do the logical thing = dismiss with prejudice. It does mean that “Obviously” is not sufficiently thorough justification to prevent a bench slap from the appeals court by about 50 pages.😅
November 19, 2025 at 8:32 PM
PS “No rule or precedent” doesn’t mean the judge can’t or shouldn’t do the logical thing = dismiss with prejudice. It does mean that “Obviously” is not sufficiently thorough justification to prevent a bench slap from the appeals court by about 50 pages.😅
BUT
6) if she ISN’T there never was a filing, so correcting the technicality is impossible because there was no technicality in the first place.
Ie,
“Fucking things up this badly is the mark of true genius!”
(Quoted because that’s not original to me.😎)
3/3
6) if she ISN’T there never was a filing, so correcting the technicality is impossible because there was no technicality in the first place.
Ie,
“Fucking things up this badly is the mark of true genius!”
(Quoted because that’s not original to me.😎)
3/3
November 19, 2025 at 8:28 PM
BUT
6) if she ISN’T there never was a filing, so correcting the technicality is impossible because there was no technicality in the first place.
Ie,
“Fucking things up this badly is the mark of true genius!”
(Quoted because that’s not original to me.😎)
3/3
6) if she ISN’T there never was a filing, so correcting the technicality is impossible because there was no technicality in the first place.
Ie,
“Fucking things up this badly is the mark of true genius!”
(Quoted because that’s not original to me.😎)
3/3
refiled with a new GJ, BUT
4) there’s a law or rule (something like “3322”) that says the government has 6 months to refile and there’s some question as to whether that’s retroactive to the original filing date BUT
5) if it’s dismissed the “Lindsey isn’t a real AUSA” issue doesn’t get adjudicated
2/
4) there’s a law or rule (something like “3322”) that says the government has 6 months to refile and there’s some question as to whether that’s retroactive to the original filing date BUT
5) if it’s dismissed the “Lindsey isn’t a real AUSA” issue doesn’t get adjudicated
2/
November 19, 2025 at 8:24 PM
refiled with a new GJ, BUT
4) there’s a law or rule (something like “3322”) that says the government has 6 months to refile and there’s some question as to whether that’s retroactive to the original filing date BUT
5) if it’s dismissed the “Lindsey isn’t a real AUSA” issue doesn’t get adjudicated
2/
4) there’s a law or rule (something like “3322”) that says the government has 6 months to refile and there’s some question as to whether that’s retroactive to the original filing date BUT
5) if it’s dismissed the “Lindsey isn’t a real AUSA” issue doesn’t get adjudicated
2/
As far as I can tell
1) nobody has ever snafu’d like this before so there is no rule or precedent to justify dismissal
2) normally it would be dismissed “without prejudice” because the problem is a technicality and apparently no irreparable harm has been done yet
3) because of the SOL it can’t be
1/
1) nobody has ever snafu’d like this before so there is no rule or precedent to justify dismissal
2) normally it would be dismissed “without prejudice” because the problem is a technicality and apparently no irreparable harm has been done yet
3) because of the SOL it can’t be
1/
November 19, 2025 at 8:20 PM
As far as I can tell
1) nobody has ever snafu’d like this before so there is no rule or precedent to justify dismissal
2) normally it would be dismissed “without prejudice” because the problem is a technicality and apparently no irreparable harm has been done yet
3) because of the SOL it can’t be
1/
1) nobody has ever snafu’d like this before so there is no rule or precedent to justify dismissal
2) normally it would be dismissed “without prejudice” because the problem is a technicality and apparently no irreparable harm has been done yet
3) because of the SOL it can’t be
1/
Jury foreman is not responsible for instruction on the law. I doubt even a practicing criminal lawyer would be held responsible for this beyond a dressing-down from any bar they’re a member of.
November 19, 2025 at 6:04 PM
Jury foreman is not responsible for instruction on the law. I doubt even a practicing criminal lawyer would be held responsible for this beyond a dressing-down from any bar they’re a member of.
Your “i” is not the only thing upside-down here!
November 19, 2025 at 5:55 PM
Your “i” is not the only thing upside-down here!
That’s not how this works, you know. Coins last pretty much forever, and frequently change hands multiple times in a day.
The real value problem is when the metal in them is worth as much as the currency.
The point where “saving a mint” (well played, that!) becomes a real issue comes much sooner.
The real value problem is when the metal in them is worth as much as the currency.
The point where “saving a mint” (well played, that!) becomes a real issue comes much sooner.
November 19, 2025 at 5:07 PM
That’s not how this works, you know. Coins last pretty much forever, and frequently change hands multiple times in a day.
The real value problem is when the metal in them is worth as much as the currency.
The point where “saving a mint” (well played, that!) becomes a real issue comes much sooner.
The real value problem is when the metal in them is worth as much as the currency.
The point where “saving a mint” (well played, that!) becomes a real issue comes much sooner.
Lake Kasumigaura in Japan had a resurrection like Lake Erie within my residence here (1990-now). They’re doing commercial fishing there again.
November 19, 2025 at 4:45 PM
Lake Kasumigaura in Japan had a resurrection like Lake Erie within my residence here (1990-now). They’re doing commercial fishing there again.
If they *could* have done it via initiative, then legislative approval is not a “necessary condition”.
Arguably that couldn’t be timely, but even then defendant could argue the legislature’s authority and motivation derive from the voters.
If you’re right we (I assume) point to legislative history.
Arguably that couldn’t be timely, but even then defendant could argue the legislature’s authority and motivation derive from the voters.
If you’re right we (I assume) point to legislative history.
November 19, 2025 at 3:42 PM
If they *could* have done it via initiative, then legislative approval is not a “necessary condition”.
Arguably that couldn’t be timely, but even then defendant could argue the legislature’s authority and motivation derive from the voters.
If you’re right we (I assume) point to legislative history.
Arguably that couldn’t be timely, but even then defendant could argue the legislature’s authority and motivation derive from the voters.
If you’re right we (I assume) point to legislative history.
I don’t know about the freelancers, but the best way to keep low and middle folk from getting audited is to fund the audit dept enough so they can go after billionaires.😈
November 19, 2025 at 2:57 PM
I don’t know about the freelancers, but the best way to keep low and middle folk from getting audited is to fund the audit dept enough so they can go after billionaires.😈
No, it will have to wait for the next administration. The auditor department is understaffed, it will stay understaffed, and actions based on AI audits will get IRS lawyers disbarred because they can’t count high enough to reach a taxable income.
If a AI flags your account that flag is forever so….
If a AI flags your account that flag is forever so….
November 19, 2025 at 2:54 PM
No, it will have to wait for the next administration. The auditor department is understaffed, it will stay understaffed, and actions based on AI audits will get IRS lawyers disbarred because they can’t count high enough to reach a taxable income.
If a AI flags your account that flag is forever so….
If a AI flags your account that flag is forever so….
Can you imagine it at the SuperBowl?!
☺️☺️☺️
☺️☺️☺️
November 19, 2025 at 1:49 PM
Can you imagine it at the SuperBowl?!
☺️☺️☺️
☺️☺️☺️
Of course *he* did.
But I was now yo when I learned it.
Ty!
But I was now yo when I learned it.
Ty!
November 19, 2025 at 1:33 PM
Of course *he* did.
But I was now yo when I learned it.
Ty!
But I was now yo when I learned it.
Ty!
Careful what you wish for. Looks more like they gave up on drugs and went with a partial lobotomy.
November 19, 2025 at 12:27 PM
Careful what you wish for. Looks more like they gave up on drugs and went with a partial lobotomy.
Talk about believing everything you read!
November 19, 2025 at 12:25 PM
Talk about believing everything you read!
Checked, NONE of my books are there.
♪“When will I be loved?!”♪
♪“When will I be loved?!”♪
November 19, 2025 at 12:19 PM
Checked, NONE of my books are there.
♪“When will I be loved?!”♪
♪“When will I be loved?!”♪