Jen Gallagher
@yeastychic.bsky.social
Reposted by Jen Gallagher
yikes
Ironically, "for more than 50 years, the journal has received funding from the National Institutes of Health to review studies on the health effects of environmental toxins—from 'forever chemicals' to air pollution—and publish the research free of charge," which are two of RFK's priorities.
Ironically, "for more than 50 years, the journal has received funding from the National Institutes of Health to review studies on the health effects of environmental toxins—from 'forever chemicals' to air pollution—and publish the research free of charge," which are two of RFK's priorities.
Citing N.I.H. Cuts, a Top Science Journal Stops Accepting Submissions
With federal support, Environmental Health Perspectives has long published peer-reviewed studies without fees to readers or scientists.
www.nytimes.com
April 30, 2025 at 11:43 AM
yikes
Ironically, "for more than 50 years, the journal has received funding from the National Institutes of Health to review studies on the health effects of environmental toxins—from 'forever chemicals' to air pollution—and publish the research free of charge," which are two of RFK's priorities.
Ironically, "for more than 50 years, the journal has received funding from the National Institutes of Health to review studies on the health effects of environmental toxins—from 'forever chemicals' to air pollution—and publish the research free of charge," which are two of RFK's priorities.
Guess what! We apparently have to now protest to keep the funding that we earned. Grants are not easy to get. Rounds of expert reviews and up to a year of waiting. Congress approved the budgets and granting agencies determine the best grants, funding training for the next generation of scientists.
March 5, 2025 at 11:56 PM
Guess what! We apparently have to now protest to keep the funding that we earned. Grants are not easy to get. Rounds of expert reviews and up to a year of waiting. Congress approved the budgets and granting agencies determine the best grants, funding training for the next generation of scientists.
@zrlon.bsky.social my students were so impressed with themselves that understood your talk and think your research is so cool. Of course you gave a really good talk. Denitrification wasn't something that I think about. I now want study effects of secrete metabolites on stress response in yeast.
November 19, 2024 at 12:46 PM
@zrlon.bsky.social my students were so impressed with themselves that understood your talk and think your research is so cool. Of course you gave a really good talk. Denitrification wasn't something that I think about. I now want study effects of secrete metabolites on stress response in yeast.