Oh wait, that new one being in Chapter 5 itself... yeah, I guess we can only get this in-game if we hang onto Tenna in Castle Town.

A mini Weird/G Route, being selfish in exchange for lore, vs sacrificing to do the right thing...

Tricky Tony at it again!

Phew, good, I'm glad that worked out!

What a daunting task! But you can give it a try! I'm cheering for you!

This IS gonna be the flower chapter... OOOOH boy!

There is a room between... o.o
Someone needs to fire up their game & interact with that wall!

Now is the back wall de-syncing an error..? Kinda looks like a door…

Good point. Maybe the green Pippin will say "But that's not even your game!!!"

That timestamp! 😲

(OMG LOL! XDDD)
IIRC, you can go to Castle Town first & Susie will get him, & he'll be there for some shenanigans.

THEN, you can visit the Ghost House, & Susie will go get Tenna to bring him to his new home.

You can do both. Take him to the Dark World first (by going there yourself, IIRC), do the interactions, then he'll at some point ask you to find him a home.

THEN go to the Ghost House, & Susie will get him & he'll be adopted.

Well, it's his nickname now, close enough! :D

Also... does anyone know if Mozilla would still have access to people's information via Firefox's sync service if we were to use a fork of Firefox, like @waterfox.net , LibreWolf, @floorp-browser.bsky.social , @zen-browser.app , etc?

So before you blindly accept their proposition to build ethical AI (which has a chance to reduce AI harm, since that could at least get less people to use all those harmful ones)... ask yourself if Mozilla has shown enough trustworthiness & user respect to be telling the truth about those ethics.

If you read the document, prepare to get really angry, or laugh hysterically. It's the product of people who are completely out of touch with reality. It's like a book report written by Cthulhu, twisting beyond any semblance of sense or mortal logic. It might drive you mad too!

Users did not consent to having their data taken, they did not consent to the (unethical!) experiment, heck the users BEGGED them to STOP! But they didn't!

Then Mozilla expects us to trust them with this big shiny AI platform that emphasizes repeatedly how it's built on trust?!

...betraying their users & their own Manifesto.

And what's disgusting is that if you look back at the Portfolio Strategy document, it both directly contradicts itself, & reveals that they were doing this crap on purpose as an experiment on us end-users!

P11.
L: Opportunity (why) | R: Action (what)

So yeah, they do NOT listen to user feedback, & even show a delusional tendency to only view it through a warped fantasy lens.

And then, just as many feared in that thread, the feature went public, & became opt-out instead of opt-in, causing issues &...

news.aibase.com/news/22711