but what if there's loads of it really fast? makes you think

indeed! and an interesting binary

yep

Systematic reviews often guide policy and theory, but they can become quickly outdated. Almost 10% of systematic reviews are out of date even *before they are published*.

Living systematic reviews (LSRs) continuously integrate new evidence, therefore they offer a solution to this problem.

2/8

they don't know how to make things better but they do know how to make it a lot worse, so by god will they

the right menu makes all the difference

linking post-publication reviews to manuscripts is a priority for a more self-correcting science, as is targeting high-impact papers, using and creating tools for checking stats -- all this is great, as is lowering the bar for open review and making the tools to do it well available to all

adding "coeliac" to the list of woke words