Of course, every rule can be broken for effect, but you can’t break a rule well until you know how it works.
Of course, every rule can be broken for effect, but you can’t break a rule well until you know how it works.
“She drifted into the store” > “She breezily entered the store” > “She entered the store like a breeze”
“Her mood exploded” > “Her mood was explosive” > “Her mood was an explosion”
“Her eyes dripped” > “Her eyes were drippy” > “Her eyes were liquid”
“She drifted into the store” > “She breezily entered the store” > “She entered the store like a breeze”
“Her mood exploded” > “Her mood was explosive” > “Her mood was an explosion”
“Her eyes dripped” > “Her eyes were drippy” > “Her eyes were liquid”
…is concentrated in that one word.
“I gave him a fist to the face” reads slower than “I punched him in the face”. The faster others understand what you’re saying, the better you are communicating.
There’s a hierarchy to this. Verb > Modifier > Noun
…is concentrated in that one word.
“I gave him a fist to the face” reads slower than “I punched him in the face”. The faster others understand what you’re saying, the better you are communicating.
There’s a hierarchy to this. Verb > Modifier > Noun
You are right that people miss things on second or even third readings. But we’re talking about ‘Buffy’. That got “read” thousands of times over twenty years and only after his cancellation did people see “it”. “It” isn’t there.
You are right that people miss things on second or even third readings. But we’re talking about ‘Buffy’. That got “read” thousands of times over twenty years and only after his cancellation did people see “it”. “It” isn’t there.
Whedon spent decades being lauded for his progressive female characters. Seeing sexism in them now is either (a) confirmation bias or (b) Uncle Tom’s Cabin.
Whedon spent decades being lauded for his progressive female characters. Seeing sexism in them now is either (a) confirmation bias or (b) Uncle Tom’s Cabin.