Topic
Politics US UK

Trump Threatens To Sue BBC

3m

After two top BBC executives resigned over a misleading Jan. 6 documentary edit, President Donald Trump threatened to sue the broadcaster for about $1 billion, demanding an apology.

1%
The Guardian
If you care about the BBC, stand up and defend it: this could be the beginning of the end | Polly Toynbee

Replacing the TV licence with a means-tested alternative may help disarm the right of one of its most effective weapons Gotcha! The BBC’s enemies have taken two scalps and inflicted maximum damage. The shock resignation of the director general, Tim Davie, and the head of news, Deborah Turness, make it look as if the BBC accepts that it does indeed suffer from “serious and systemic” bias in its coverage of issues including Donald Trump, Gaza and trans rights. But in this political coup, only the BBC’s sworn ideological foes think a cherrypicked sample of journalistic errors amounts to “systemic” bias. It was indeed a bad mistake to splice together two bits of Trump’s speech; but it needed a quick apology, not a decapitation. The BBC’s chair, Samir Shah, I’m told, tried to persuade Davie to stay to avoid this apparent capitulation to critics: Davie should indeed have stood his ground, not weakened the BBC by walking away. Polly Toynbee is a Guardian columnist Continue reading. . .

If you care about the BBC, stand up and defend it: this could be the beginning of the end | Polly Toynbee
Reposts 68 9h

Reposted by Mary Corcoran

2%
The Guardian
Donald Trump threatens BBC with $1bn lawsuit as chair says speech edit was ‘error of judgment’ – latest updates

BBC chair Samir Shah apologises for way in which speech from US president was edited after corporation’s two most senior executives resign We have heard from Culture, Media and Sport committee chair Caroline Dinenage , who has suggested that the outgoing BBC director Tim Davie ignored an internal dossier into bias at the BBC (see post at 09. 06 for more detail on the dossier). She said Davie “ignored” concerns raised in Michael Prescott’s report over the way the speech by Donald Trump was edited for Panorama . I’m very sad about Tim Davie stepping down. I think he was an effective leader at the BBC. I think he was a great champion for public service media, but there is no escaping the fact that he was very slow to act on this particular issue. But this isn’t the first time and on this particular issue, Michael Prescott’s report, he just didn’t take it seriously until it was too late. I would like to say it has been the privilege of my career to serve as the CEO of BBC News and to work with our brilliant team of journalists. I stepped down over the weekend because the buck stops with me. But I’d like to make one thing very clear, BBC News is not institutionally biased. That’s why it’s the world’s most trusted news provider. Continue reading. . .

Donald Trump threatens BBC with $1bn lawsuit as chair says speech edit was ‘error of judgment’ – latest updates
Reposts 53 9h

Reposted by Paul Davies

0%
Financial Times
To fix the BBC, focus on competence and cash

Corporation fails to learn from criticism, while politicians have consciously reduced its scope for quality journalism

To fix the BBC, focus on competence and cash
Reposts 143 15h
The Guardian
The first step towards saving our precious BBC: remove Robbie Gibb from the board | Ed Davey

The BBC belongs to all of us, and it is under attack as never before. The government must defend it from its enemies, within and without The BBC is under attack as never before. Donald Trump and his cronies have it squarely in their sights - and there are no prizes for guessing why. The BBC is the world’s number one source of trusted news, so of course snake-oil salesmen such as Trump see it as their enemy. If your power is built on conspiracy theories and distortions of the truth, the last thing you want is respected, independent journalists exposing that and holding you to account. That’s why rightwing populists have been attacking the BBC for years. Dominic Cummings (remember him? ) once oversaw a report that called it the “ mortal enemy ” of the Conservative party and set out a plan to undermine it with a new “Fox News equivalent”. In 2019, Nigel Farage called the BBC “ the enemy ”. In 2021, Boris Johnson appointed two Conservative cronies - Richard Sharp and Robbie Gibb - to the BBC board, as chair and non-executive director respectively. Ed Davey is the leader of the Liberal Democrats and MP for Kingston and Surbiton Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here . Continue reading. . .

The first step towards saving our precious BBC: remove Robbie Gibb from the board | Ed Davey
Reposts 185 8h
The Guardian
The Guardian view on the BBC under siege: Britain must defend its own truth | Editorial

With Donald Trump circling and Labour ministers wavering, defending the corporation’s independence is now a test of national will. The chair of the BBC, Samir Shah, struck a defensive tone in his interview to explain the mess the broadcaster has found itself in. The impression was of an organisation under siege rather than one confidently self-correcting. Mr Shah will be busy. He must find a new director-general after Tim Davie resigned. Gone too is the CEO of News, Deborah Turness. Both resigned after an exhausting right-wing campaign which cried bias at every turn and was energised by an absurd transatlantic attempt to paint the BBC as part of a global liberal conspiracy. A giant like the BBC will make mistakes. The failure is not owning them fast enough and moving on. The corporation remains one of Britain’s few genuinely national institutions - and ministers say it is a “light on the hill” for people here and abroad. The BBC is the most trusted source of news in the UK, and among the top five worldwide. Yet awareness of that value has faded as the broadcaster struggled to articulate a clear civic mission. This is a strategic blunder in the face of competition from US big tech, which wants to monetise outrage rather than the truth. Viewed from that perspective the current row over the editing of Donald Trump’s speech for Panorama is a sideshow. The real fight is over what impartiality means - and who gets to decide. Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here. Continue reading.

The Guardian view on the BBC under siege: Britain must defend its own truth | Editorial
Reposts 9 6h