EU orders chatbots disclose sources

Scholar power: 97.9%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 37%, Computer science 32%, Communication & Media Studies 21%, Political science 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Serge Belongie	32%	104	97.9%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

47.0%

16.1 h

1

97.9%

Ranking score

0.06

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Serge Belongie

@serge.belongie.com

Interview from last week’s AI in Science summit in Copenhagen ais25.eu

Europe’s Win and Worry with Artificial Intelligence

Launch of RAISE – the Resource for AI Science in Europe.

www.sciencestories.dk

November 10, 2025 at 5:26 PM

by Andrew Guthrie Ferguson

23%

Scholar power: 23.6%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 37%, Computer science 32%, Communication & Media Studies 21%, Political science 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Andrew Guthrie Ferguson	21%	14	23.6%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

68.0%

20.7 h

3

23.6%

Ranking score

0.035

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Andrew Guthrie Ferguson

@profferguson.bsky.social

@nilsgilman.bsky.social

Interesting piece about a legal privilege for AI communications. In my forthcoming book, I propose a broader legal privilege for digital communications (not just AI).

Doctors, Lawyers and Priests Keep Secrets. Why Not Your Chatbot? www.nytimes.com/2025/11/10/o...

Opinion | Doctors, Lawyers and Priests Keep Secrets. Why Not Your Chatbot?

www.nytimes.com

November 10, 2025 at 12:48 PM

by Daniel J. Solove

26%

Scholar power: 26.3%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 37%, Computer science 32%, Communication & Media Studies 21%, Political science 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Daniel J. Solove	16%	30	26.3%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

54.0%

16.5 h

1

26.3%

Ranking score

0.024

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Daniel Solove

@daniel-solove.bsky.social

“AI is trained based on a massive taking of people’s data without consent, oversight, limitation, or any consideration of the harms it might create.” – from “The Great Scrape” FINAL PUBLISHED ARTICLE papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

November 10, 2025 at 4:57 PM

by Martin Paul Eve

18%

Scholar power: 18.3%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 37%, Computer science 32%, Communication & Media Studies 21%, Political science 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Martin Paul Eve	14%	19	18.3%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

53.0%

13.6 h

1

18.3%

Ranking score

0.02

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Martin Paul Eve

@eve.gd

Oh good heavens. What could possibly go wrong?

ChatGPT: "Yes, you're right. The release date wasn't for another five years. Thanks for spotting that."

www.theguardian.com/society/2025...

AI chatbots could help stop prisoner release errors, says justice minister

HMP Wandsworth gets ‘green light’ to use AI after team sent in to find ‘quick fixes’ after spate of mistakes

www.theguardian.com

November 10, 2025 at 7:53 PM

by Fabio Sabatini Reposted by Laura Pérez Ortiz

3%

Scholar power: 3.9%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 37%, Computer science 32%, Communication & Media Studies 21%, Political science 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Fabio Sabatini	2%	29	3.2%
🎓 Laura Pérez Ortiz	3%	5	0.7%
Total			3.9%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index + sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

54.0%

24.3 h

3

3.9%

Ranking score

0.014

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Fabio Sabatini

@fabiosabatini.bsky.social

🧵 Uno studio del think tank britannico Institute of Strategic Dialogue ha mostrato che la propaganda russa è presente in circa una risposta su cinque dei chatbot di intelligenza artificiale quando si parla di Ucraina. 👇

1/8

November 10, 2025 at 9:09 AM

Reposted by Fabián Muniesa

1%

Scholar power: 1.2%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 37%, Computer science 32%, Communication & Media Studies 21%, Political science 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Fabián Muniesa	2%	34	1.2%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

53.0%

14.9 h

101

1.2%

Ranking score

0.013

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Kath Barbadoro

@kathbarbadoro.bsky.social

Google AI is like an Eric Adams quote generator

Al Overview

Men in New York have done countless things throughout history, from building the city to participating in major events like the Stonewall riots and the September 11 attacks. Their actions have ranged from daily life and economic hardship during the Great Depression to playing significant roles in the city's political and social landscape, such as the assassination of Malcolm X or the fight for LGBTQ+ rights.

November 10, 2025 at 6:37 PM

Reposted by Jocalyn Clark

0%

Scholar power: 0.0%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 37%, Computer science 32%, Communication & Media Studies 21%, Political science 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Jocalyn Clark	0%	56	0.0%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

63.0%

22.5 h

2

0.0%

Ranking score

0.005

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

New York Times Opinion

@nytopinion.nytimes.com

“As people increasingly turn to A.I. chat tools as confidants, therapists and advisers, we urgently need a new form of legal protection that would safeguard most private communications between people and A.I. chatbots,” writes Nils Gilman.

Opinion | Doctors, Lawyers and Priests Keep Secrets. Why Not Your Chatbot?

The case for “A.I. Interaction Privilege.”

nyti.ms

November 10, 2025 at 11:00 AM

by Fabio Sabatini

3%

Scholar power: 3.2%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 37%, Computer science 32%, Communication & Media Studies 21%, Political science 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Fabio Sabatini	2%	29	3.2%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

52.0%

15.9 h

7

3.2%

Ranking score

0.012

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Fabio Sabatini

@fabiosabatini.bsky.social

Quello che vedete nella foto è Grem, il primo chatbot per bambini, capace di parlare con voce umana e di stabilire una connessione "intima" con vostro figlio.
È integrato in un peluche tanto puccioso.
Ma anche tanto spaventoso.
fabiosabatini.substack.com/p/gli-anti-s...

Gli anti-social media

Come Internet e i social media, anche l’intelligenza artificiale rischia di indebolire le nostre relazioni e disgregare il tessuto sociale, con effetti funzionali all’autoritarismo.

fabiosabatini.substack.com

November 10, 2025 at 5:34 PM

by John Quiggin

0%

Scholar power: 0.0%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 37%, Computer science 32%, Communication & Media Studies 21%, Political science 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 John Quiggin	0%	55	0.0%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

47.0%

25.8 h

2

0.0%

Ranking score

0.004

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

John Quiggin

@johnquiggin.bsky.social

The most useful « AI » is just Google as it should have been by 2010. Natural language questions and answers with citations and links. Google summaries nowhere near this. Enshittification is incurable

November 10, 2025 at 7:40 AM

by Christian Zimmermann

5%

Scholar power: 5.5%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 37%, Computer science 32%, Communication & Media Studies 21%, Political science 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Christian Zimmermann	4%	21	5.5%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

50.0%

19.4 h

0

5.5%

Ranking score

0.004

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Christian Zimmermann

@czimm-economist.bsky.social

RePEc Blog:

AI issues in RePEc

blog.repec.org/2025/11/10/a...

#RePEc #EconSky

AI issues in RePEc

Over the past year, various RePEc services have been struggling with issues stemming from artificial intelligence robots (AI bots), and this post is a short summary of what happening and where we s…

blog.repec.org

November 10, 2025 at 2:05 PM

by Fabio Sabatini

3%

Scholar power: 3.2%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 37%, Computer science 32%, Communication & Media Studies 21%, Political science 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Fabio Sabatini	2%	29	3.2%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

50.0%

24.3 h

2

3.2%

Ranking score

0.006

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Fabio Sabatini

@fabiosabatini.bsky.social

Secondo i ricercatori, questo risultato conferma che i sistemi di AI tendono a riprodurre un meccanismo di confirmation bias: imitano il linguaggio dell’utente e lo usano per modellare il tono e il contenuto delle risposte, comprese le fonti da cui attingono le informazioni.

4/8

November 10, 2025 at 9:09 AM

Reposted by Albin Wagener

2%

Scholar power: 2.0%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 37%, Computer science 32%, Communication & Media Studies 21%, Political science 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Albin Wagener	7%	8	2.0%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

47.0%

23.8 h

65

2.0%

Ranking score

0.003

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Bande Daisy née

@daisyletourneur.bsky.social

Je vois que ça débat encore du mec qui a fait son visuel en IA pour parler de désinformation et une ligne de défense c'est : il y a une différence entre utiliser l'IA pour informer (ce qu'il a fait) et utiliser l'IA pour désinformer. Et bah je suis pas si sûre. 🧵

November 10, 2025 at 9:40 AM

Reposted by Alison Phipps

1%

Scholar power: 1.3%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 37%, Computer science 32%, Communication & Media Studies 21%, Political science 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Alison Phipps	3%	18	1.3%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

59.0%

30.2 h

11

1.3%

Ranking score

0.003

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Drop Site

@dropsitenews.com

➤ AI manipulation and chatbot targeting:

For the first time, a state is documented trying to shape discourse through generative AI systems like ChatGPT and Claude. A clause in Israel’s $6 million contract with Trump campaign strategist Brad Parscale’s firm, Clock Tower X, directs the creation of...

November 10, 2025 at 3:19 AM

by Fabio Sabatini

3%

Scholar power: 3.2%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 37%, Computer science 32%, Communication & Media Studies 21%, Political science 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Fabio Sabatini	2%	29	3.2%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

46.0%

24.3 h

2

3.2%

Ranking score

0.006

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Fabio Sabatini

@fabiosabatini.bsky.social

Ne ho scritto nel nuovo post sul mio blog, dove ho ho provato a spiegare perché l’AI rischia di portare a compimento il processo già avviato dai social media, diventando una nuova infrastruttura del potere.

8/8
fabiosabatini.substack.com/p/gli-anti-s...

Gli anti-social media

Come Internet e i social media, anche l’intelligenza artificiale rischia di indebolire le nostre relazioni e disgregare il tessuto sociale, con effetti funzionali all’autoritarismo.

fabiosabatini.substack.com

November 10, 2025 at 9:09 AM

Light upyour news

EU orders chatbots disclose sources

Scholar power: 97.9%

Scholar power: 23.6%

Scholar power: 26.3%

Scholar power: 18.3%

Scholar power: 3.9%

Scholar power: 1.2%

Scholar power: 0.0%

Scholar power: 3.2%

Scholar power: 0.0%

Scholar power: 5.5%

Scholar power: 3.2%

Scholar power: 2.0%

Scholar power: 1.3%

Scholar power: 3.2%

Sign in to Lightnews

Sign up to start reading

Connect Bluesky

Connect with Bluesky

Light up
your news