5,140 users ran experiments, and they belonged to 1,175 projects. 307 of those projects were classes, accounting for 16.4% of node-hours.
Users published 79 papers that used CloudLab for evaluation, including at NSDI, OSDI, SOSP, USENIX Security, FAST, VLDB, ASPLOS, POPL, and MICRO.
Users published 79 papers that used CloudLab for evaluation, including at NSDI, OSDI, SOSP, USENIX Security, FAST, VLDB, ASPLOS, POPL, and MICRO.
December 15, 2025 at 5:44 PM
5,140 users ran experiments, and they belonged to 1,175 projects. 307 of those projects were classes, accounting for 16.4% of node-hours.
Users published 79 papers that used CloudLab for evaluation, including at NSDI, OSDI, SOSP, USENIX Security, FAST, VLDB, ASPLOS, POPL, and MICRO.
Users published 79 papers that used CloudLab for evaluation, including at NSDI, OSDI, SOSP, USENIX Security, FAST, VLDB, ASPLOS, POPL, and MICRO.
CloudLab 2025 Year in Review:
This year, CloudLab users collectively ran 124,025 experiments using 14.3 million node-hours.
The busiest cluster on CloudLab was Utah, which accounted for 5M node-hours. Wisconsin accounted for 3.7M node-hours, and Clemson 2.6M node-hours.
This year, CloudLab users collectively ran 124,025 experiments using 14.3 million node-hours.
The busiest cluster on CloudLab was Utah, which accounted for 5M node-hours. Wisconsin accounted for 3.7M node-hours, and Clemson 2.6M node-hours.
December 15, 2025 at 5:44 PM
CloudLab 2025 Year in Review:
This year, CloudLab users collectively ran 124,025 experiments using 14.3 million node-hours.
The busiest cluster on CloudLab was Utah, which accounted for 5M node-hours. Wisconsin accounted for 3.7M node-hours, and Clemson 2.6M node-hours.
This year, CloudLab users collectively ran 124,025 experiments using 14.3 million node-hours.
The busiest cluster on CloudLab was Utah, which accounted for 5M node-hours. Wisconsin accounted for 3.7M node-hours, and Clemson 2.6M node-hours.