#Constitutional
No, but I’d love to read those (although his dad was probably his prime inspiration, as he’d been pro-constitutional monarchy himself ahead of the revolution)
October 31, 2025 at 9:56 AM Everybody can reply
But presenting this as a quasi-private decision of the monarch seems questionable from the perspective of constitutional convention.
October 31, 2025 at 9:55 AM Everybody can reply
A constitutional question: maintaining the roll of the peerage is the responsibility of a government minister, viz the Lord Chancellor. It's maintained by the Ministry of Justice. Is the King able independently to instruct the Lord Chancellor to remove someone from the roll, or can he only do so...
October 31, 2025 at 9:55 AM Everybody can reply
I'm certainly not the one 'who leans towards fascism'. In fact, arguing that established principles of constitutional relevance (like academic freedom) must be suspended in relation to those who think the opposite from us is very much in tune with fascism. I hope that makes sense
October 31, 2025 at 9:54 AM Everybody can reply
Is there absolutely no legal or constitutional way around a gutless limp d**k 💩 weasel who refuses to do his job? 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬
It's been 37 days since Adelita Grijalva was elected by the people of Arizona's seventh congressional district to represent them in Congress.

Mike Johnson still refuses to swear her in.
October 31, 2025 at 9:49 AM Everybody can reply
Yes Trump is monitoring your social media. How much longer will Republicans in Congress fail to exercise their constitutional powers over a lawless executive branch.
CPB showed at a client’s home in nyc today for “consensual chat” about their social media posts. client is an american citizen if you care about such things.
October 31, 2025 at 9:27 AM Everybody can reply
Let them keep their titles but use their vast fortune to fill the budget black hole.

Other European countries have a constitutional monarchy where the wealth is owned by the state, not the royals.
October 31, 2025 at 9:23 AM Everybody can reply
#JoeBiden allowed most #Americans 2 opt out of getting vaccines because constitutionally it was their right the only exceptions were when unvaccinated endangered the health of others. it is a constitutional right 2 get vaccines if that is what U believe will help U & #Rfkjr had brain worms on heroin
October 31, 2025 at 9:22 AM Everybody can reply
1 reposts
On that view, I doubt the Constitutional provisions you cite, are implicated. Indeed, unless SCOTUS reverses the lower courts’ tariff decisions, this deal might not even come to fruition.
I’m a fierce critic of Trump. In my view, he brags boasts & lies ‘bigly’. 4/5
October 31, 2025 at 9:21 AM Everybody can reply
Shit. Again? Last time they told me to stop asking for my constitutional rights to wear a shirt with a red and black flag. Fuck it.. Inflatable unicorn costume it is. Less exposure to pepper spray, and an air cushion for pepper balls.
October 31, 2025 at 9:18 AM Everybody can reply
Unfuckingbelieveable that we have these masked jack booted thugs running rampant in our cities defying American citizens constitutional rights..
Things will get worse..
October 31, 2025 at 9:11 AM Everybody can reply
1 likes
I am not often in agreement with the editorial positions of The Economist, but I've always found their arguments to be logical and intellectually honest.

This one's neither of those. It is factually incorrect as all serious Constitutional judges, lawyers, and scholars will tell you.
October 31, 2025 at 8:49 AM Everybody can reply
I was about to say I often look to Kim Kardashian when I'm seeking scientific advice. Just like I regularly tune in to the Joe Rogan show for insights into constitutional law...
October 31, 2025 at 8:44 AM Everybody can reply
4 likes 1 saves
Plus all those things people think would happen if you abolished the monarchy were either already accomplished by becoming a constitutional monarchy, or would actually only occur if you abolished & nationalised the duchies.
October 31, 2025 at 8:41 AM Everybody can reply
Federalism is such a good point. I don't see solid constitutional authority—though, I grant I'm unimaginative—for the federal government to directly do much (other than banning GAC in interstate commerce, maybe). Taxing? Can't be a penalty. Spending? Strings attached can't be coercive.
October 31, 2025 at 8:41 AM Everybody can reply
“Lawmakers must not be lawbreakers” if it means anything must mean for laws passed on your watch and instituted by you or a body for which you were collectively responsible NOT a council before you came to power under delegated constitutional authority from an earlier Parliament
October 31, 2025 at 8:39 AM Everybody can reply
important to remember, but with corrupt SCOTUS + its immunity ruling
what is constitutional,
what is legal,
what is overturned+stopped by the lower courts
no longer matters.
A new memo signed by President Trump, known as NSPM-7, aims to add nonprofits and activists to an ever-growing list of what he calls the “enemy within.”
It’s important to remember that the president cannot rewrite the Constitution by memo.
October 31, 2025 at 8:34 AM Everybody can reply
important to remember, but with corrupt SCOTUS + its immunity ruling
what is constitutional,
what is legal,
what is overturned+stopped by the lower courts
no longer matters.
October 31, 2025 at 8:33 AM Everybody can reply
"Higgins, who is also known for not paying child support and being a supporter of anti-constitutional insurrectionists, took to... X.... In his post, the former police spokesman and full-time tough guy cosplayer argued Americans who receive SNAP benefits... should 'never again receive SNAP.'" 😂😂
Louisiana Rep. Clay Higgins thinks soldiers’ kids can starve
Noted racist and dark magic enthusiast Republican Louisiana Rep. Clay Higgins thinks the thousands of active duty U.S. military families in America are smoking crack and don’t need the paltry
www.nola.com
October 31, 2025 at 8:30 AM Everybody can reply
1 likes
Dumb "conservatives" still blabbing how Istanbul convention is about "gender propaganda". Disgusting.

It's been a major talking point in Bulgaria too, and Boyko Borissov, then PM, used the Constitutional court to shut down any debate over it by court decision that it's anti-constitutional.

⤵️
October 31, 2025 at 8:28 AM Everybody can reply
1 reposts
and uphold the Constitution we must bring it to the public's attention. There are many good people in our nation that are being penalized for doing their jobs, for following laws, for invoking their constitutional rights.
October 31, 2025 at 8:27 AM Everybody can reply
not "a third time"

500+ more times

We need a high-powered firehose of impeachments.

Every single crime committed by the orange scum and his henchmen must be impeached.

It is their Constitutional Duty.

They swore an oath.
October 31, 2025 at 8:27 AM Everybody can reply
I feel like this was some kind of deal struck to end the war of the roses or some such? UK constitutional ‘law’ is so muddy. Just a bunch of mouldy calf skin chewed up by rats. The Magna Carta was all about giving more power to the feudal leaders (morphed into parliament)
October 31, 2025 at 8:21 AM Everybody can reply
I do think Andrew v Rex citing breach of Article 6 would be constitutional case of the millennium
October 31, 2025 at 8:20 AM Everybody can reply
2 likes