Donald Trump's comments about Letitia James couldn't possibly violate a gag order against making pub... #donaldtrump #letitiajames #lauraloomer #arthurengoron #alvinbragg

YouTube video by The Jimmy Dore Show

YouTube video by The Jimmy Dore Show

YouTube video by The Jimmy Dore Show

YouTube video by The Jimmy Dore Show

YouTube video by The Jimmy Dore Show

Uncle Nearest CEO Fawn Weaver has spoken out publicly for the first time since a court gag order was lifted, addressing rumors… The post Fawn Weaver Says Gag Order Lifted! Separates ‘Fact from Fiction’ About Uncle Nearest’s Future appeared first on Shine My Crown.

A gag order issued in the guardianship case of Estelle Simonton exposes deep concerns in Oklahoma’s guardianship system.

YouTube video by Legal AF

KOTA KINABALU, Aug 20 — The lawyer representing one of five teenagers charged in the Zara Qairina Mahathir’s bullying case has explained that the defence team is working pro...

KOTA KINABALU, Aug 20 — A gag order has been issued on the bullying case of the late Zara Qairina Mahathir at Children’s Court here today. The lawyer representing Zara...

Special Counsel Jack Smith's efforts to gag Donald Trump is a major trigger for this author. I've be... #jacksmith #donaldtrump #freespeech #truthsocial #gagorder

Aġġornat: 4 ta’ Awwissu 2025 / Updated: 4 August 2025 Libertà tal-Istampa f'Malta: X'Jibgħat Gag Order tal-Qorti? Gist F’inċident li qanqal tħassib serju fost il-ġurnalisti, il-Qorti ta’ Malta ordnat proviżorjament lill-gazzetta Times of Malta biex ma tippubblikax storja dwar il-kumpanija tal-flus elettroniċi Papaya Ltd, wara li din tal-aħħar ressqet rikors legali urġenti. L-għaqda tal-ġurnalisti IĠM qalet li dan l-att jippreżenta “theddida serja għal-libertà tal-istampa u d-dritt tal-pubbliku li jkun jaf,” filwaqt li l-NGO Repubblika appellat għal riforma fil-liġijiet tal-midja biex il-ġurnalisti jkunu protetti minn intimidazzjoni bħal din. Il-każ, li qed jitqies bħala tentattiv ta' ċensura, ġej minn talba tal-kumpanija li allegatament l-artiklu jikser il-liġijiet ta' segretezza dwar il-ħasil tal-flus. Il-qorti ppustponiet is-seduta dwar l-inġunzjoni, bil-gazzetta tiċħad l-allegazzjonijiet u ssostni li qed tiġi abbużata mill-proċess legali. Naqilgħu minn xiri kwalifikanti permezz ta’ din il-link tal-Amazon: https://amzn.to/3Avoaxz Lest li tidħol aktar fil-fond fis-suġġetti li qed niddiskutu? Appoġġja x-xogħol tagħna billi tikklikkja fuq il-link affiljat tal-Amazon tagħna għax-xiri li jmiss tiegħek! Kull klikk tgħinna nwasslulkom kontenut aktar perspikativ. Kuntest Il-każ oriġina meta l-gazzetta Times of Malta bagħtet mistoqsijiet lil Papaya Ltd nhar it-24 ta’ Lulju 2025 dwar storja investigattiva li kienet qed tħejji. Il-ġurnata ta’ wara, il-kumpanija ressqet inġunzjoni urġenti fil-qorti, bl-argument li l-artiklu ppjanat jikser il-liġijiet ta' segretezza relatati mal-ħasil tal-flus. Il-qorti, kif inhi l-prattika, ħarġet l-inġunzjoni proviżorja sakemm tisma' l-każ. Dan l-inċident sar pubbliku fis-27 ta' Lulju 2025 meta l-Istitut tal-Ġurnalisti Maltin (IĠM) ħareġ stqarrija li fiha esprima tħassib profond. Il-gazzetta qed targumenta li din l-inġunzjoni hija ordni ta' "gagging" li thedded il-ġurnaliżmu investigattiv u d-dritt tal-pubbliku li jkun infurmat. Il-ġurnalist Jacob Borg u l-editur Herman Grech huma fost dawk immirati bl-inġunzjoni. Impatt fuq Malta Dan il-każ qed joħloq skossi serji f’Malta. Il-libertà tal-istampa hija pilastru fundamentali f'kull demokrazija, u l-abbiltà tal-ġurnalisti li jinvestigaw u jirrappurtaw mingħajr biża’ hija essenzjali. Fil-passat, Malta kienet immarkata minn nuqqas ta’ protezzjoni għall-ġurnalisti, li laħaq il-qofol tiegħu fl-assassinju ta’ Daphne Caruana Galizia. Il-Gvern Malti kien ippreżenta abbozzi ta' liġi dwar il-midja, iżda kemm l-IĠM kif ukoll Repubblika qed jargumentaw li dawn ma jmorrux biżżejjed biex jipproteġu l-ġurnalisti minn kawżi strateġiċi (SLAPP) u ordnijiet li joħonqu l-informazzjoni. Dan l-episodju jenfasizza l-urġenza biex ikun hemm liġijiet b’saħħithom li jipproteġu l-ġurnaliżmu fl-interess pubbliku. Il-pubbliku għandu bżonn midja ħielsa biex iżomm lill-awtoritajiet u lill-kumpaniji responsabbli. L-Istitut tal-Ġurnalisti Maltin (IĠM) jinsab fil-proċess li jsir unjin irreġistrata, u dan jagħtih aktar saħħa biex jiddefendi d-drittijiet tal-ġurnalisti. Konnessjoni Globali Dan l-inċident huwa parti minn xejra globali fejn entitajiet b'saħħithom, kemm politiċi kif ukoll finanzjarji, jużaw l-għodod legali biex iwaqqfu l-ġurnaliżmu investigattiv. Din il-forma ta’ intimidazzjoni hija magħrufa bħala SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation). Il-Parlament Ewropew approva direttiva ġdida fl-2024 ( https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2024/02/19/new-eu-rules-on-protecting-journalists-and-human-rights-defenders-from-strategic-lawsuits-agreed/ ) biex jipproteġi lill-ġurnalisti minn dawn it-tip ta’ kawżi madwar l-Unjoni Ewropea. Il-każ tal-Papaya Ltd kontra Times of Malta huwa eżempju lokali ċar li juri li din il-problema mhix limitata għal pajjiżi oħra, iżda hija sfida diretta għall-istat tad-dritt f’Malta. Barra minn hekk, Papaya Ltd qed tappella multa ta’ €279,000 mill-FIAU għal ksur allegat tal-liġijiet tal-ħasil tal-flus, wara li direttur tagħha kien sanzjonat mill-Istati Uniti minħabba rabtiet mar-Russja. Perspettiva Kulturali F'Malta, il-libertà tal-kelma u l-ġurnaliżmu ħieles huma ħafna drabi marbutin mal-istorja tagħna ta' reżistenza u ġlieda għad-drittijiet fundamentali. Il-kultura Maltija tivvaluta l-onestà u l-ġustizzja, u hemm biża' li l-użu ta' ordnijiet bħal dawn tal-qorti jista' joħloq "chilling effect" – fejn ġurnalisti jibżgħu jinvestigaw stejjer ta' interess pubbliku minħabba l-biża' ta' azzjoni legali u spejjeż għoljin. Il-kliem “X’se jsir minna?” u “Min se jgħidilna x’inhu l-veru?” spiss ikunu fuq fomm in-nies meta jiffaċċjaw inċidenti li jidhru li qed jimminaw id-dritt li jkunu infurmati. X’Jista’ Jagħmel Int? * Segwi l-Aħbarijiet: Ibqa’ infurmat dwar l-iżviluppi fil-każ permezz ta’ siti tal-aħbarijiet indipendenti. * Appoġġja l-Midja: Appoġġja lill-midja Maltija permezz ta’ donazzjonijiet jew sħubijiet. Pereżempju, tista’ ssir membru tal-IĠM ( https://www.igm.mt/become-a-member-2/ ) biex tappoġġja lill-għaqda fil-ġlieda tagħha għal-libertà tal-istampa. Verifika tal-Fatti * Fatti Verifikati / Verified Facts: Il-Qorti ħarġet inġunzjoni proviżorja kontra Times of Malta. Papaya Ltd hija kumpanija tal-flus elettroniċi. L-Istitut tal-Ġurnalisti Maltin (IĠM) esprima tħassib pubbliku. Il-każ seħħ wara li l-ġurnal bagħat mistoqsijiet lill-kumpanija dwar storja ppjanata. * Dikjarazzjonijiet Mhux Fatti / Non-Factual Statements: Il-proposta tal-IĠM li din hija theddida serja hija l-opinjoni tal-għaqda. Ir-raġuni għall-inġunzjoni mill-kumpanija hija li l-artiklu jikser il-liġijiet ta’ segretezza, iżda dan għadu mhux fatt deċiżiv mill-qorti. * Ambigwità u Nuqqas ta’ Ċarezza / Ambiguity or Lack of Clarity: L-inġunzjoni hija temporanja u għadha ma ġietx deċiża. L-impatt finali fuq il-libertà tal-istampa se jiddependi mid-deċiżjoni tal-qorti u kif din il-liġi se tiġi applikata fil-futur. Għal min irid ikun jaf aktar... F’ċertu sens, l-istampa hija bħal sistema tal-allarm għall-pubbliku. Meta l-allarm jitfa’ sinjal, bħal f’dan il-każ b’istorja investigattiva, ħadd m’għandu jkun permess li jwaqqfu minn barra billi jgħatti l-allarm. Il-qorti qed tiddeċiedi jekk il-gazzetta għandhiex id-dritt tkompli tagħmel il-ħoss jew jekk il-kumpanija għandhiex id-dritt tgħattiha. Fl-aħħar mill-aħħar, id-deċiżjoni se turi kemm f’Malta huwa prezzjuż dan l-allarm. X’taħseb li hu l-bilanċ ġust bejn id-dritt ta’ kumpanija li tipproteġi r-reputazzjoni tagħha u d-dritt tal-pubbliku li jkun jaf dwar kwistjonijiet ta’ interess pubbliku? Għidilna x'taħseb hawn: https://forms.gle/F2a4b8c9x5p7q6r2 Sorsi * Times of Malta: Journalists’ union expresses ‘deep concern’ at Times of Malta gag order (Is-sors ewlieni għar-rapporti tal-każ). * Newsbook Malta: IĠM slams court order gagging journalists over money laundering investigation (Jipprovdi l-perspettiva ta’ IĠM u Repubblika). * The Malta Independent: Companies and political figures should not be allowed to hide behind gag orders, Repubblika says (Jinkludi kummenti ta’ Repubblika fuq il-każ u t-tħassib usa' dwar ir-riforma tal-liġijiet). * Kunsill tal-Unjoni Ewropea: New EU rules on protecting journalists and human rights defenders from strategic lawsuits agreed (Jiddiskuti r-regoli tal-UE kontra s-SLAPP). Aktar Qari * Times of Malta: Times of Malta hit by court ‘gagging order’ from e-money firm * The Malta Independent: IĠM denounces 'attempt to muzzle' free press --- Updated: 4 August 2025 Press Freedom in Malta: What Does a Court Gag Order Send? Gist In an incident that has triggered serious concern among journalists, a Maltese court provisionally ordered the Times of Malta newspaper not to publish a story about e-money company Papaya Ltd, after the latter filed an urgent legal application. The journalists' union IĠM said this act presents a “serious threat to press freedom and the public's right to know,” while the NGO Repubblika called for media law reform to protect journalists from such intimidation. The case, which is being viewed as an attempt at censorship, stems from the company's claim that the article would violate money laundering secrecy laws. The court postponed the hearing on the injunction, with the newspaper denying the allegations and arguing that the legal process is being abused. We earn from qualifying purchases through this Amazon link: https://amzn.to/3Avoaxz Ready to dive deeper into the topics we’re discussing? Support our work by clicking our Amazon affiliate link for your next purchase! Every click helps us deliver more insightful content. Context The case originated when the Times of Malta newspaper sent questions to Papaya Ltd on 24 July 2025 about an investigative story it was preparing. The next day, the company filed an urgent injunction in court, arguing that the planned article would violate secrecy laws related to money laundering. The court, as is practice, issued a provisional injunction until the case could be heard. This incident became public on 27 July 2025 when the Institute for Maltese Journalists (IĠM) released a statement expressing deep concern. The newspaper is arguing that this injunction is a "gagging" order that threatens investigative journalism and the public's right to be informed. The journalist Jacob Borg and editor Herman Grech are among those targeted by the injunction. Impact on Malta This case is creating serious ripples in Malta. Press freedom is a fundamental pillar of any democracy, and the ability of journalists to investigate and report without fear is essential. In the past, Malta has been marked by a lack of protection for journalists, which culminated in the assassination of Daphne Caruana Galizia. The Maltese Government has presented media law bills, but both the IĠM and Repubblika are arguing that these do not go far enough to protect journalists from strategic lawsuits (SLAPP) and orders that stifle information. This episode emphasizes the urgency for strong laws that protect journalism in the public interest. The public needs a free media to hold authorities and companies accountable. The Institute for Maltese Journalists (IĠM) is in the process of becoming a registered union, which gives it more power to defend journalists' rights. Global Connection This incident is part of a global trend where powerful entities, both political and financial, use legal tools to stop investigative journalism. This form of intimidation is known as a SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation). The European Parliament approved a new directive in 2024 ( https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2024/02/19/new-eu-rules-on-protecting-journalists-and-human-rights-defenders-from-strategic-lawsuits-agreed/ ) to protect journalists from these types of lawsuits across the European Union. The Papaya Ltd case against Times of Malta is a clear local example that shows this problem is not limited to other countries, but is a direct challenge to the rule of law in Malta. Furthermore, Papaya Ltd is appealing a €279,000 fine from the FIAU for alleged money laundering law breaches, after one of its directors was sanctioned by the United States due to links with Russia. Cultural Perspective In Malta, freedom of speech and a free press are often linked to our history of resistance and the fight for fundamental rights. Maltese culture values honesty and justice, and there is a fear that the use of such court orders could create a "chilling effect"—where journalists are afraid to investigate stories of public interest due to the fear of legal action and high costs. The phrases “What will become of us?” and “Who will tell us what is true?” are often on people's lips when they face incidents that seem to undermine the right to be informed. What Can You Do? * Follow the News: Stay informed about developments in the case through independent news sites. * Support the Media: Support Maltese media through donations or memberships. For example, you can become a member of the IĠM ( https://www.igm.mt/become-a-member-2/ ) to support the union in its fight for press freedom. Fact Check * Verified Facts: The Court issued a provisional injunction against Times of Malta. Papaya Ltd is an e-money company. The Institute for Maltese Journalists (IĠM) expressed public concern. The case occurred after the newspaper sent questions to the company about a planned story. * Non-Factual Statements: The IĠM's assertion that this is a serious threat is the union's opinion. The reason for the company's injunction is that the article would violate secrecy laws, but this is not yet a decisive fact from the court. * Ambiguity or Lack of Clarity: The injunction is temporary and has not yet been decided. The final impact on press freedom will depend on the court's decision and how this law will be applied in the future. For those who want to know more... In a sense, the press is like a public alarm system. When the alarm sounds, as in this case with an investigative story, no one should be allowed to stop it from the outside by covering the alarm. The court is deciding whether the newspaper has the right to continue making noise or if the company has the right to cover it. Ultimately, the decision will show how precious this alarm is in Malta. What do you think is the fair balance between a company's right to protect its reputation and the public's right to know about issues of public interest? Tell us what you think here: https://forms.gle/F2a4b8c9x5p7q6r2 Sources * Times of Malta: Journalists’ union expresses ‘deep concern’ at Times of Malta gag order (The main source for reports on the case). * Newsbook Malta: IĠM slams court order gagging journalists over money laundering investigation (Provides the perspective of IĠM and Repubblika). * The Malta Independent: Companies and political figures should not be allowed to hide behind gag orders, Repubblika says (Includes Repubblika's comments on the case and the wider concern about law reform). * Council of the European Union: New EU rules on protecting journalists and human rights defenders from strategic lawsuits agreed (Discusses EU rules against SLAPP). Further Reading * Times of Malta: Times of Malta hit by court ‘gagging order’ from e-money firm * The Malta Independent: IĠM denounces 'attempt to muzzle' free press

Aġġornat: 4 ta’ Awwissu 2025 / Updated: 4 August 2025 Libertà tal-Istampa f'Malta: X'Jibgħat Gag Order tal-Qorti? Gist F’inċident li qanqal tħassib serju fost il-ġurnalisti, il-Qorti ta’ Malta ordnat proviżorjament lill-gazzetta Times of Malta biex ma tippubblikax storja dwar il-kumpanija tal-flus elettroniċi Papaya Ltd, wara li din tal-aħħar ressqet rikors legali urġenti. L-għaqda tal-ġurnalisti IĠM qalet li dan l-att jippreżenta “theddida serja għal-libertà tal-istampa u d-dritt tal-pubbliku li jkun jaf,” filwaqt li l-NGO Repubblika appellat għal riforma fil-liġijiet tal-midja biex il-ġurnalisti jkunu protetti minn intimidazzjoni bħal din. Il-każ, li qed jitqies bħala tentattiv ta' ċensura, ġej minn talba tal-kumpanija li allegatament l-artiklu jikser il-liġijiet ta' segretezza dwar il-ħasil tal-flus. Il-qorti ppustponiet is-seduta dwar l-inġunzjoni, bil-gazzetta tiċħad l-allegazzjonijiet u ssostni li qed tiġi abbużata mill-proċess legali. Naqilgħu minn xiri kwalifikanti permezz ta’ din il-link tal-Amazon: https://amzn.to/3Avoaxz Lest li tidħol aktar fil-fond fis-suġġetti li qed niddiskutu? Appoġġja x-xogħol tagħna billi tikklikkja fuq il-link affiljat tal-Amazon tagħna għax-xiri li jmiss tiegħek! Kull klikk tgħinna nwasslulkom kontenut aktar perspikativ. Kuntest Il-każ oriġina meta l-gazzetta Times of Malta bagħtet mistoqsijiet lil Papaya Ltd nhar it-24 ta’ Lulju 2025 dwar storja investigattiva li kienet qed tħejji. Il-ġurnata ta’ wara, il-kumpanija ressqet inġunzjoni urġenti fil-qorti, bl-argument li l-artiklu ppjanat jikser il-liġijiet ta' segretezza relatati mal-ħasil tal-flus. Il-qorti, kif inhi l-prattika, ħarġet l-inġunzjoni proviżorja sakemm tisma' l-każ. Dan l-inċident sar pubbliku fis-27 ta' Lulju 2025 meta l-Istitut tal-Ġurnalisti Maltin (IĠM) ħareġ stqarrija li fiha esprima tħassib profond. Il-gazzetta qed targumenta li din l-inġunzjoni hija ordni ta' "gagging" li thedded il-ġurnaliżmu investigattiv u d-dritt tal-pubbliku li jkun infurmat. Il-ġurnalist Jacob Borg u l-editur Herman Grech huma fost dawk immirati bl-inġunzjoni. Impatt fuq Malta Dan il-każ qed joħloq skossi serji f’Malta. Il-libertà tal-istampa hija pilastru fundamentali f'kull demokrazija, u l-abbiltà tal-ġurnalisti li jinvestigaw u jirrappurtaw mingħajr biża’ hija essenzjali. Fil-passat, Malta kienet immarkata minn nuqqas ta’ protezzjoni għall-ġurnalisti, li laħaq il-qofol tiegħu fl-assassinju ta’ Daphne Caruana Galizia. Il-Gvern Malti kien ippreżenta abbozzi ta' liġi dwar il-midja, iżda kemm l-IĠM kif ukoll Repubblika qed jargumentaw li dawn ma jmorrux biżżejjed biex jipproteġu l-ġurnalisti minn kawżi strateġiċi (SLAPP) u ordnijiet li joħonqu l-informazzjoni. Dan l-episodju jenfasizza l-urġenza biex ikun hemm liġijiet b’saħħithom li jipproteġu l-ġurnaliżmu fl-interess pubbliku. Il-pubbliku għandu bżonn midja ħielsa biex iżomm lill-awtoritajiet u lill-kumpaniji responsabbli. L-Istitut tal-Ġurnalisti Maltin (IĠM) jinsab fil-proċess li jsir unjin irreġistrata, u dan jagħtih aktar saħħa biex jiddefendi d-drittijiet tal-ġurnalisti. Konnessjoni Globali Dan l-inċident huwa parti minn xejra globali fejn entitajiet b'saħħithom, kemm politiċi kif ukoll finanzjarji, jużaw l-għodod legali biex iwaqqfu l-ġurnaliżmu investigattiv. Din il-forma ta’ intimidazzjoni hija magħrufa bħala SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation). Il-Parlament Ewropew approva direttiva ġdida fl-2024 ( https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2024/02/19/new-eu-rules-on-protecting-journalists-and-human-rights-defenders-from-strategic-lawsuits-agreed/ ) biex jipproteġi lill-ġurnalisti minn dawn it-tip ta’ kawżi madwar l-Unjoni Ewropea. Il-każ tal-Papaya Ltd kontra Times of Malta huwa eżempju lokali ċar li juri li din il-problema mhix limitata għal pajjiżi oħra, iżda hija sfida diretta għall-istat tad-dritt f’Malta. Barra minn hekk, Papaya Ltd qed tappella multa ta’ €279,000 mill-FIAU għal ksur allegat tal-liġijiet tal-ħasil tal-flus, wara li direttur tagħha kien sanzjonat mill-Istati Uniti minħabba rabtiet mar-Russja. Perspettiva Kulturali F'Malta, il-libertà tal-kelma u l-ġurnaliżmu ħieles huma ħafna drabi marbutin mal-istorja tagħna ta' reżistenza u ġlieda għad-drittijiet fundamentali. Il-kultura Maltija tivvaluta l-onestà u l-ġustizzja, u hemm biża' li l-użu ta' ordnijiet bħal dawn tal-qorti jista' joħloq "chilling effect" – fejn ġurnalisti jibżgħu jinvestigaw stejjer ta' interess pubbliku minħabba l-biża' ta' azzjoni legali u spejjeż għoljin. Il-kliem “X’se jsir minna?” u “Min se jgħidilna x’inhu l-veru?” spiss ikunu fuq fomm in-nies meta jiffaċċjaw inċidenti li jidhru li qed jimminaw id-dritt li jkunu infurmati. X’Jista’ Jagħmel Int? * Segwi l-Aħbarijiet: Ibqa’ infurmat dwar l-iżviluppi fil-każ permezz ta’ siti tal-aħbarijiet indipendenti. * Appoġġja l-Midja: Appoġġja lill-midja Maltija permezz ta’ donazzjonijiet jew sħubijiet. Pereżempju, tista’ ssir membru tal-IĠM ( https://www.igm.mt/become-a-member-2/ ) biex tappoġġja lill-għaqda fil-ġlieda tagħha għal-libertà tal-istampa. Verifika tal-Fatti * Fatti Verifikati / Verified Facts: Il-Qorti ħarġet inġunzjoni proviżorja kontra Times of Malta. Papaya Ltd hija kumpanija tal-flus elettroniċi. L-Istitut tal-Ġurnalisti Maltin (IĠM) esprima tħassib pubbliku. Il-każ seħħ wara li l-ġurnal bagħat mistoqsijiet lill-kumpanija dwar storja ppjanata. * Dikjarazzjonijiet Mhux Fatti / Non-Factual Statements: Il-proposta tal-IĠM li din hija theddida serja hija l-opinjoni tal-għaqda. Ir-raġuni għall-inġunzjoni mill-kumpanija hija li l-artiklu jikser il-liġijiet ta’ segretezza, iżda dan għadu mhux fatt deċiżiv mill-qorti. * Ambigwità u Nuqqas ta’ Ċarezza / Ambiguity or Lack of Clarity: L-inġunzjoni hija temporanja u għadha ma ġietx deċiża. L-impatt finali fuq il-libertà tal-istampa se jiddependi mid-deċiżjoni tal-qorti u kif din il-liġi se tiġi applikata fil-futur. Għal min irid ikun jaf aktar... F’ċertu sens, l-istampa hija bħal sistema tal-allarm għall-pubbliku. Meta l-allarm jitfa’ sinjal, bħal f’dan il-każ b’istorja investigattiva, ħadd m’għandu jkun permess li jwaqqfu minn barra billi jgħatti l-allarm. Il-qorti qed tiddeċiedi jekk il-gazzetta għandhiex id-dritt tkompli tagħmel il-ħoss jew jekk il-kumpanija għandhiex id-dritt tgħattiha. Fl-aħħar mill-aħħar, id-deċiżjoni se turi kemm f’Malta huwa prezzjuż dan l-allarm. X’taħseb li hu l-bilanċ ġust bejn id-dritt ta’ kumpanija li tipproteġi r-reputazzjoni tagħha u d-dritt tal-pubbliku li jkun jaf dwar kwistjonijiet ta’ interess pubbliku? Għidilna x'taħseb hawn: https://forms.gle/F2a4b8c9x5p7q6r2 Sorsi * Times of Malta: Journalists’ union expresses ‘deep concern’ at Times of Malta gag order (Is-sors ewlieni għar-rapporti tal-każ). * Newsbook Malta: IĠM slams court order gagging journalists over money laundering investigation (Jipprovdi l-perspettiva ta’ IĠM u Repubblika). * The Malta Independent: Companies and political figures should not be allowed to hide behind gag orders, Repubblika says (Jinkludi kummenti ta’ Repubblika fuq il-każ u t-tħassib usa' dwar ir-riforma tal-liġijiet). * Kunsill tal-Unjoni Ewropea: New EU rules on protecting journalists and human rights defenders from strategic lawsuits agreed (Jiddiskuti r-regoli tal-UE kontra s-SLAPP). Aktar Qari * Times of Malta: Times of Malta hit by court ‘gagging order’ from e-money firm * The Malta Independent: IĠM denounces 'attempt to muzzle' free press --- Updated: 4 August 2025 Press Freedom in Malta: What Does a Court Gag Order Send? Gist In an incident that has triggered serious concern among journalists, a Maltese court provisionally ordered the Times of Malta newspaper not to publish a story about e-money company Papaya Ltd, after the latter filed an urgent legal application. The journalists' union IĠM said this act presents a “serious threat to press freedom and the public's right to know,” while the NGO Repubblika called for media law reform to protect journalists from such intimidation. The case, which is being viewed as an attempt at censorship, stems from the company's claim that the article would violate money laundering secrecy laws. The court postponed the hearing on the injunction, with the newspaper denying the allegations and arguing that the legal process is being abused. We earn from qualifying purchases through this Amazon link: https://amzn.to/3Avoaxz Ready to dive deeper into the topics we’re discussing? Support our work by clicking our Amazon affiliate link for your next purchase! Every click helps us deliver more insightful content. Context The case originated when the Times of Malta newspaper sent questions to Papaya Ltd on 24 July 2025 about an investigative story it was preparing. The next day, the company filed an urgent injunction in court, arguing that the planned article would violate secrecy laws related to money laundering. The court, as is practice, issued a provisional injunction until the case could be heard. This incident became public on 27 July 2025 when the Institute for Maltese Journalists (IĠM) released a statement expressing deep concern. The newspaper is arguing that this injunction is a "gagging" order that threatens investigative journalism and the public's right to be informed. The journalist Jacob Borg and editor Herman Grech are among those targeted by the injunction. Impact on Malta This case is creating serious ripples in Malta. Press freedom is a fundamental pillar of any democracy, and the ability of journalists to investigate and report without fear is essential. In the past, Malta has been marked by a lack of protection for journalists, which culminated in the assassination of Daphne Caruana Galizia. The Maltese Government has presented media law bills, but both the IĠM and Repubblika are arguing that these do not go far enough to protect journalists from strategic lawsuits (SLAPP) and orders that stifle information. This episode emphasizes the urgency for strong laws that protect journalism in the public interest. The public needs a free media to hold authorities and companies accountable. The Institute for Maltese Journalists (IĠM) is in the process of becoming a registered union, which gives it more power to defend journalists' rights. Global Connection This incident is part of a global trend where powerful entities, both political and financial, use legal tools to stop investigative journalism. This form of intimidation is known as a SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation). The European Parliament approved a new directive in 2024 ( https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2024/02/19/new-eu-rules-on-protecting-journalists-and-human-rights-defenders-from-strategic-lawsuits-agreed/ ) to protect journalists from these types of lawsuits across the European Union. The Papaya Ltd case against Times of Malta is a clear local example that shows this problem is not limited to other countries, but is a direct challenge to the rule of law in Malta. Furthermore, Papaya Ltd is appealing a €279,000 fine from the FIAU for alleged money laundering law breaches, after one of its directors was sanctioned by the United States due to links with Russia. Cultural Perspective In Malta, freedom of speech and a free press are often linked to our history of resistance and the fight for fundamental rights. Maltese culture values honesty and justice, and there is a fear that the use of such court orders could create a "chilling effect"—where journalists are afraid to investigate stories of public interest due to the fear of legal action and high costs. The phrases “What will become of us?” and “Who will tell us what is true?” are often on people's lips when they face incidents that seem to undermine the right to be informed. What Can You Do? * Follow the News: Stay informed about developments in the case through independent news sites. * Support the Media: Support Maltese media through donations or memberships. For example, you can become a member of the IĠM ( https://www.igm.mt/become-a-member-2/ ) to support the union in its fight for press freedom. Fact Check * Verified Facts: The Court issued a provisional injunction against Times of Malta. Papaya Ltd is an e-money company. The Institute for Maltese Journalists (IĠM) expressed public concern. The case occurred after the newspaper sent questions to the company about a planned story. * Non-Factual Statements: The IĠM's assertion that this is a serious threat is the union's opinion. The reason for the company's injunction is that the article would violate secrecy laws, but this is not yet a decisive fact from the court. * Ambiguity or Lack of Clarity: The injunction is temporary and has not yet been decided. The final impact on press freedom will depend on the court's decision and how this law will be applied in the future. For those who want to know more... In a sense, the press is like a public alarm system. When the alarm sounds, as in this case with an investigative story, no one should be allowed to stop it from the outside by covering the alarm. The court is deciding whether the newspaper has the right to continue making noise or if the company has the right to cover it. Ultimately, the decision will show how precious this alarm is in Malta. What do you think is the fair balance between a company's right to protect its reputation and the public's right to know about issues of public interest? Tell us what you think here: https://forms.gle/F2a4b8c9x5p7q6r2 Sources * Times of Malta: Journalists’ union expresses ‘deep concern’ at Times of Malta gag order (The main source for reports on the case). * Newsbook Malta: IĠM slams court order gagging journalists over money laundering investigation (Provides the perspective of IĠM and Repubblika). * The Malta Independent: Companies and political figures should not be allowed to hide behind gag orders, Repubblika says (Includes Repubblika's comments on the case and the wider concern about law reform). * Council of the European Union: New EU rules on protecting journalists and human rights defenders from strategic lawsuits agreed (Discusses EU rules against SLAPP). Further Reading * Times of Malta: Times of Malta hit by court ‘gagging order’ from e-money firm * The Malta Independent: IĠM denounces 'attempt to muzzle' free press

Officials in President Donald Trump’s administration have been prohibited from talking about Jeffrey Epstein, a White House source told NBC News Thursday.“Trump himself has signaled that he doesn’t wa...