#SARS
meldepflichtig. Dies gilt z.B. für einen Nachweis durch eine PCR und auch für positive Schnelltests auf SARS-CoV-2, zum Beispiel Antigennachweise. Die Meldepflicht für positive Erregernachweise nach § 7 IfSG besteht für Labore, /
October 27, 2025 at 7:27 AM Everybody can reply
Ich hab jetzt noch eine Mail an das RKI geschrieben, aufgrund der FAQ zu Covid-19 auf der Websseite. Ich finde die nicht klar genug und sie ist Stand 2023.
Dort steht: "Gemäß § 7 Absatz 1 Nummer 44a IfSG ist der Nachweis des Erregers SARS-CoV-2, soweit er auf eine akute Infektion hinweist, /
Das ist schon spannend, welche Reaktionen man bekommt, wenn man sich bei der Ärztekammer Westfalen-Lippe und der KV-WL nach den aktuellen Empfehlungen im Umgang mit COVID-19 erkundigt 😂
stay tuned
October 27, 2025 at 7:27 AM Everybody can reply
1 reposts 1 likes
Heck, Canada had a national standard in place that would have stopped COVID transmission - but public health and infection control leaders had to play cowboy, and show us they were right all along, and didn't botch SARS.

But they weren't, and they did, and now their egos have killed millions.

🤷
💯As one example, hospitals in Canada regularly act as if they are entitled to just wing workplace safety. The relevant national standard requires N95 respirators or better if e.g. SARS-CoV-2 or H5N1 may be present.

But instead HCW are treated as consumables.
www.csagroup.org/store/produc...
October 27, 2025 at 5:47 AM Everybody can reply
5 likes
We knew what to do from day 1. We had plans in place. The findings of the inquiry into the way they botched SARS-CoV-1 - which would have stopped COVID dead - were on the books for well over a decade when they botched SARS-CoV-2 the same way.

COVID is an elective, Dunning-Kruger pandemic.
🧵 Excerpts from the 2006 report of Canada's SARS Commission. An inquiry into the mismanagement of SARS-CoV-1, it was the most essential read for any competent IPC / Public Health professional attempting to avoid mismanaging SARS-COV-2.

So…mostly ignored.

www.archives.gov.on.ca/en/e_records...
October 27, 2025 at 5:47 AM Everybody can reply
1 reposts 6 likes
Unlikely. Repeated infection with SARS-CoV-2 is widespread, with long term impacts across systems including interference with the immune system, while at least some #longCIVUD may reflect viral persistence. And public health leaders gambling from ignorance do not have a good track record.

🧵:
From populists on the right, but also from establishment figures desperate to bury their responsibility, there's an ongoing push to bury the harms of COVID.

Long COVID alone costs 7M life-years (QALYs) and on the order of a trillion dollars a year in the OECD.
www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issue...
October 27, 2025 at 5:16 AM Everybody can reply
1 reposts 6 likes
c
ジャレド・ダイヤモンド著『銃・病原菌・鉄』を再び読了した。前回初めて読んだのが何年前でどんな状況だったか覚えていないが、内容はけっこう覚えていた。やっぱり面白い。わかりやすいし読みやすい。
「ヨーロッパ人はニューギニアにさまざまなものを持ち込んだが、ニューギニアではそれらが作り出されなかったのはなぜか」という現地人の素朴な問いに、人種的な優劣ではない根拠で、1万3000年前からの人類の動きを追って答えようとする壮大なこの本、ほんとにめちゃ面白い。
文庫版訳者あとがきでSARSとかのパンデミックに触れられてるけど、今ならコロナについてもまた振り返ることができるのだろうな。
October 27, 2025 at 4:59 AM Everybody can reply
What takes years with HIV or CMV, SARS-CoV-2 can partially induce after only a few reinfections - because it targets same regulatory & metabolic axes of immunity.
It’s about a slow, measurable erosion of immune diversity - a rewriting of body’s defenses that affects everyone exposed often enough.
October 27, 2025 at 4:20 AM Everybody can reply
1 reposts
The immune repertoire doesn’t fully recover after infection. Diversity shrinks, & with reinfection the system no longer returns to balance.
The study analyzed T-cell receptors in people after a first infection & after reinfection with SARS-CoV-2.
October 27, 2025 at 4:19 AM Everybody can reply
1 reposts 1 likes
#covidisnotover #maskforyourlife #cleantheair
Via @zdenikvrozina
“A new important study in Frontiers shows that repeated SARS-CoV-2 infections are beginning to display same patterns seen in chronic viral infections - narrowing of T-cell repertoire, exhaustion, & loss of immune flexibility (!)🧵
October 27, 2025 at 4:19 AM Everybody can reply
3 likes 1 saves
Many oncogenic viruses with higher prevalence than SARS-COV-2 can inactivate p53. But viruses are responsible for less than 20% of cancers worldwide. Most SARS-COV-2 infections will be dormant before they cause cellular changes or potential oncogenesis.

Are the above ideas correct?
October 27, 2025 at 3:18 AM Everybody can reply
Wasn't this the same guy that urged the NIH and CDC look at how people could inhale bleach to kill the SARS/Covid virus?
What a dunderhead.
October 27, 2025 at 2:50 AM Everybody can reply
When you bring up that people will not like being infected with SARS and starved to death and being homeless and starting wars around the world, the fascist answer is "when they try to do anything, we'll shoot them with all our guns and it'll be so good. So cool and good. So many bodies!"
October 27, 2025 at 2:47 AM Everybody can reply
1 reposts 15 likes
I guarantee that both of these grifters have had the most recently available SARS-2 booster shots, and I'll give you odds they've had twinrix, too...

#MalignantConservatism
Here she is.

Tucker Carlson: “If the vaccine is effective and you take it, then why does it matter if I take it?”
Cheryl Hines: “It doesn’t make any sense.”
Tucker: “So ‘my body, my choice’ was not a real thing, it turned out.”
“It’s your body, my choice.”
Cheryl: “Yeah, your body, my choice.”
October 27, 2025 at 12:46 AM Everybody can reply
1 reposts 4 likes
True dat.

SARS-2 disrupts the “guardian of the genome”…one of the body’s core cellular defense mechanisms … that protects us from cancer, genomic instability, and premature cell survival of damaged cells.

But go ahead… keep huffing it.
SARS-CoV-2 interferes with p53 signalilng.

That may not mean much to non-specialists, but as a PhD in that area, it's the biggest possible red flag, and the flag is also on fire.

We don't yet know how bad it'll be, but with public health asleep at the wheel (as usual), there's no real upper limit.
The worst part of the potential for COVID to cause cancer is that it's entirely predictable, but the medical policy types have to control everything, so they locked science out of the room and tried to wing it.

Dunning-Kruger pandemic.
October 27, 2025 at 12:23 AM Everybody can reply
26 reposts 63 likes 7 saves
The global COVID-19 pandemic (also known as the coronavirus pandemic), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), began with an outbreak in Wuhan, China, in December 2019. Soon after, it spread to other parts of Asia and then worldwide in early 2020.
🧐
October 26, 2025 at 11:58 PM Everybody can reply
このリサーチに関して、X-twitterで @harryspoelstra.bsky.social さんがうまい要約をしていらしたんですが、

「一度の感染なら、回復は可能。

しかし3回、4回、5回と新型コロナにかかると、免疫の“累積的な摩耗”になる可能性がある。

❗️感染のたびに免疫記憶が少しずつ書き換えられ、柔軟性が低下する」

➡️SARS-CoV-2は、人の免疫を静かに作り替えつつある😬

(私も一度感染しました。それを二度、三度と回を重ねない事、改めて心したいと思います)

www.frontiersin.org/journals/imm...
Frontiers | Distinct characteristics of T cell receptor repertoire associated with the SARS-CoV-2 reinfection
The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by SARS-CoV-2, represents one of the most profound global public health challenges in modern history. While T cell immunity is ...
www.frontiersin.org
October 26, 2025 at 11:55 PM Everybody can reply
1 reposts 6 likes
#zdenekvrozina on X wrote: A new important study in Frontiers in Immunology shows that repeated SARS-CoV-2 infections are beginning to display the same patterns seen in chronic viral infections - narrowing of the T-cell repertoire, exhaustion, and loss of immune flexibility (!)🧵 […]
Original post on mastodon.nl
mastodon.nl
October 26, 2025 at 11:25 PM Everybody can reply
1 likes 1 saves
SARS-CoV-2 interferes with p53 signalilng.

That may not mean much to non-specialists, but as a PhD in that area, it's the biggest possible red flag, and the flag is also on fire.

We don't yet know how bad it'll be, but with public health asleep at the wheel (as usual), there's no real upper limit.
The worst part of the potential for COVID to cause cancer is that it's entirely predictable, but the medical policy types have to control everything, so they locked science out of the room and tried to wing it.

Dunning-Kruger pandemic.
October 26, 2025 at 11:11 PM Everybody can reply
18 reposts 1 quotes 54 likes 13 saves
I just got brand new sars-cov-2 antibodies matching my own DNA code natively.
October 26, 2025 at 11:02 PM Everybody can reply
I think virus novelty very clearly drives this, and while it's still producing what out immune system sees as significantly novelty-noting that SARS-CoV-2 variants differ in more than the Spike region-travel from one to another's may drive the biannual peaks, which differs from flu...
October 26, 2025 at 10:55 PM Everybody can reply
1 likes
SARS-COV2 is what happened

repeated infections cause neurological damage - people's brains are fucked

and the older you are, the more it's noticeable because the Covid damage comes on top of normal age related cognitive decline
October 26, 2025 at 10:53 PM Everybody can reply
#MrGrump aka #MadManTrump
He's a bad 1️⃣ #MrGrump
0️⃣ morals or ethics does he show
He has a pouty 👄 that screams & whines of his self-inflicted woes
No 1️⃣ can tell him he's wrong or he'll sing his siren's song

#Jan6Insurrection

Ghislaine Maxwell says
Jeffrey Epstein recorded
Trump with his victims
October 26, 2025 at 10:34 PM Everybody can reply
1 likes
Impossible to say until after the fact. But I suspect that we are getting there step by step.
SARS-CoV-2 is an endemic virus with a biannual pattern, causing fewer deaths & our immune systems have experienced an increasing number of variants. But time will tell.
October 26, 2025 at 10:32 PM Everybody can reply
2 likes