#houseoversight011344
LightNews LightNews
epsteinweb.bsky.social
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011344.jpg
#epsteinweb #houseoversight011344
41 H3VOGIU1 1 or was not privileged. We don't take jury evidence on that, 2 you know, Judge Marra's ruling, and therefore, that should be 3 excluded. So that is item number 19. 4 Let me turn then to item 20, and I'm handling that. 5 This is essentially a hearsay exercise. We want information to 6 be excluded regarding Rebecca Boylan. Why? Because Rebecca 7 Boylan has not been deposed and is not going to be a witness in 8 the case. 9 As we understand what the defendant is planning to do, 10 she's planning to call Mr. Dershowitz. Mr. Dershowitz is going ide to say Ms. Boylan told him that Ms. Giuffre told him something, 12 and so we have the classic hearsay within a hearsay situation. 13 The problem, of course, is that Boylan is not here. 14 The defendant's pleadings say, ah-hah, but this is an 5 admission by Ms. Giuffre, and it would be if Ms. Boylan were on 6, the stand so we could ask her questions about, well, did a Ms. Giuffre really say that? And what did she mean? And 18 wasn't she saying that she's been abused by Ms. Maxwell? But 18 they want to skip over that intermediate stuff, have Dershowitz 20 describe what Boylan describes Ms. Giuffre said, and that's Pal obviously -- and then I'm assuming Dershowitz is going to put 22 his spin on what Ms. Boylan allegedly said to him. There are 23 no set of circumstances in which that hearsay within hearsay 24 could be admissible because Ms. Boylan has not been deposed, 25 and is not here, it's rank multiple hearsay. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011344
February 7, 2026 at 12:59 AM