Peerreview, de kwaliteitstoets in de wetenschap, wordt steeds vaker uitbesteed aan artificiële intelligentie. Een kwalijke evolutie, die de betrouwbaarheid van onderzoek ondermijnt, waarschuwen onderzoekers. Al kan AI de peerreviewcrisis misschien ook helpen oplossen.

Peerreview, de kwaliteitstoets in de wetenschap, wordt steeds vaker uitbesteed aan artificiële intelligentie. Een kwalijke evolutie, die de betrouwbaarheid van onderzoek ondermijnt, waarschuwen onderzoekers. Al kan AI de peerreviewcrisis misschien ook helpen oplossen.

Critics of scientific publishing suggest reform is needed to resolve the #PeerReviewCrisis. We want to know—What do you think could improve peer review? Are the comments you receive useful? Have you been retaliated against? Share your experience here: cen.acs.org/policy/publi...

Critics of scientific publishing suggest reform is needed to resolve the #PeerReviewCrisis. What do you think could improve peer review? Are the comments you receive useful? Have you been retaliated against? Share your experience here: cen.acs.org/policy/publi...

#phdchat #academicchatter 🧪

Critics of scientific publishing suggest reform is needed to resolve the #PeerReviewCrisis. We want to know—What do you think could improve peer review? Are the comments you receive useful? Have you been retaliated against? Share your experience here: cen.acs.org/policy/publi... #chemsky 🧪

The flood of academic papers is straining peer review and rewarding quantity over quality—one AI-generated study even included a fake rat with impossible anatomy. A reckoning is coming, with reform on the horizon. #AcademicPublishing #PeerReviewCrisis scientificinquirer.com/2025/07/14/d...

Scientists’ suit against top academic publishers lays bare deep frustration over unpaid peer review

Researchers allege journal publishers violated federal antitrust law

#PeerReviewCrisis #AcademicPublishing #UnpaidLabor #OpenScience #FairPayForResearchers

www.statnews.com/2025/03/10/p...

Just got a 'request to review' where the editor sent me a *table* of papers they can't find reviewers for and asked me to please select one or two that I'd be willing to do. For these (hours) of work they offer 100 points that can be used to purchase services from the publisher. #peerreviewcrisis

I guess I should clarify that by 'single, objectively terrible review' I mean that the editor at this major journal was *unable to find more than one reviewer - and zero qualified reviewers - for our manuscript*. That is emblematic of the #peerreviewcrisis . Something fundamental needs to change.

Wow. We just got hit full in the face with the #peerreviewcrisis currently facing science publishing. Our manuscript was rejected from a major journal (with invitation to resubmit) on the basis of a single, objectively terrible review that used the word 'sketchy'... Twice! Who's got solutions??

Say it with me, peer reviewers everywhere, "I cannot use ChatGPT to write my reviews. I cannot use ChatGPT to write my reviews. I cannot use ChatGPT to write my reviews. I cannot use ChatGPT to write my reviews." #peerreviewcrisis #researchintegrity #omfg 😱 #academicbluesky

reducing the willingness of agents to collaborate, insofar as they substitute intrinsic motivation with extrinsic motivation."
#peerreviewashtag/peerreviewCrisis" class="hover:underline text-blue-600 dark:text-sky-400 no-card-link">#peerreviewCrisis #peerreview https://jlis.fupress.net/index.php/jlis/article/download/511/486 (2/2)