#replicability
LightNews LightNews
neural-reckoning.org
One nice thing about working on theoretical/computational science is that in principle we can have perfect replicability by just providing the source code.

One sad thing is that this never happens. Even when we have the code it doesn't run or produces different results.
November 15, 2025 at 3:15 PM
longtail.news
Feed: "Replicability-Index"
By: Ulrich Schimmack on Thursday, November 13, 2025
Personality Science – Chapter 08
Genes and Environment Summary Where do personality differences come from? Chapter 8 answers this question by tracing decades of research in behavioral genetics, showing how both genetic and environmen...
replicationindex.com
November 13, 2025 at 11:49 PM
wesleyreginald.bsky.social
I know I've mentioned it several times but I'm really hoping Once Upon a Katamari adds online leaderboards, it's one of those little things that adds so much replicability for me.
November 13, 2025 at 7:23 PM
knutson-brain.sfba.social.ap.brid.gy
Investigator: Works years to establish novel effect.
Reviewer: “That won’t replicate.”
Investigator: Works years to establish replicability.
Reviewer: “That’s not novel.”
( #scienceishard )
November 13, 2025 at 4:16 PM
tatianatrifan.bsky.social
Reading a couple of studies claiming that few studies in psychology could replicate effects of previous studies, it became obvious these studies on replicability were themselves biased, failed to understand that the longer the time between original and replication, the higher the nonreplicability.
November 13, 2025 at 7:56 AM
tatianatrifan.bsky.social
They also forget that there is an optimal window for replicability in studies involving humans, as there are many factors that change over time and that could influence results. These aspects do not make the fields such as social and behavioural sciences less scientific.
November 13, 2025 at 7:51 AM
tatianatrifan.bsky.social
I see people who have taken their information from a couple of YouTube videos demand with authoritarianism that replicability should be pushed even when said studies cannot be replicable due to ethics, due to the fact that what they explored is meant to evolve or was an one-off event.
November 13, 2025 at 7:51 AM
longtail.news
Feed: "Replicability-Index"
By: Ulrich Schimmack on Wednesday, November 12, 2025
Personality Science 2025: Table of Content
About the Author Chapter 01 - Definition and History of Personality Science Chapter 02 - Basic Scientific Concepts Chapter 03 - The Structure of Personality Traits Chapter 04 - The Measurement of Pers...
replicationindex.com
November 12, 2025 at 11:47 PM
longtail.news
Feed: "Replicability-Index"
By: Ulrich Schimmack on Wednesday, November 12, 2025
Personality Science 2025: About the Author
Science is often described as objective. Given the same evidence, anyone should reach the same conclusion. In reality, things are more complicated. Even in the most rigorous sciences, researchers’ per...
replicationindex.com
November 12, 2025 at 11:47 PM
longtail.news
Feed: "Replicability-Index"
By: Ulrich Schimmack on Wednesday, November 12, 2025
Chapter 02 – Basic Scientific Concepts
replicationindex.com
November 12, 2025 at 11:47 PM
longtail.news
Feed: "Replicability-Index"
By: Ulrich Schimmack on Wednesday, November 12, 2025
Personality Science – 2025: Chapter 01
replicationindex.com
November 12, 2025 at 11:47 PM
longtail.news
Feed: "Replicability-Index"
By: Ulrich Schimmack on Wednesday, November 12, 2025
Chapter 03 – The Structure of Personality Traits
The Structure of Personality Traits Summary
replicationindex.com
November 12, 2025 at 11:47 PM
longtail.news
Feed: "Replicability-Index"
By: Ulrich Schimmack on Wednesday, November 12, 2025
Personality Science – Chapter 05
Personality and Situation Summary Why do people behave the way they do? Chapter 5 tackles one of psychology’s oldest questions: whether human behavior is shaped more by personality or by the situation...
replicationindex.com
November 12, 2025 at 11:47 PM
longtail.news
Feed: "Replicability-Index"
By: Ulrich Schimmack on Wednesday, November 12, 2025
Chapter 04 – The Measurement of Personality Traits
The Measurement of Personality Traits Summary Modern measures generally achieve high reliability (often α = .70–.90), meaning they capture stable individual differences rather than noise. Yet reliabil...
replicationindex.com
November 12, 2025 at 11:47 PM
longtail.news
Feed: "Replicability-Index"
By: Ulrich Schimmack on Wednesday, November 12, 2025
Chapter 06 – Stability and Change Personality
replicationindex.com
November 12, 2025 at 11:47 PM
longtail.news
Feed: "Replicability-Index"
By: Ulrich Schimmack on Wednesday, November 12, 2025
Chapter 08 – Genetic and Environmental Causes of Personality
replicationindex.com
November 12, 2025 at 11:46 PM
sinaiccp.bsky.social
👉 Saren Seeley continues our Day 3 with a discussion on Study Design & Replicability #NYCPW2025
November 12, 2025 at 6:15 PM
eustace.justshootme.ca
#Alt4You
Originally posted by: @lisafdavis.bsky.social
bsky.app/profile/lisafdavis.b...
• 2. Send it to a Scholar Who Actually Works on the Voynich The single best person to evaluate a proposed solution is: Prof. Lisa Fagin Davis (Medieval Academy of America; manuscript scholar; active in Voynich studies) She has reviewed more Voynich claims than anyone, gives clear feedback, and will tell you honestly whether the method is viable. She publicly invites people to submit their work as long as it's in a clear, replicable, written form. I've solved the Voynich Manuscript. Who should I send my solution to? Congratulations on reaching a point where you feel you have a real solution — that alone is an impressive amount of work. Here's the practical, realistic path for sharing a Voynich Manuscript solution so it gets a fair, serious review by the people who actually work on it. V 1. Start with a Written Paper (PDF) Before sending it anywhere, make sure you have a clean, academic-style write-up: • State the hypothesis clearly. • Show decoding method, not just decoded results. • Demonstrate replicability: how someone else can apply your method and get the same output. • Provide worked examples (not just translations, but the steps that produce them). • Address known objections (entropy, glyph frequencies, positional patterns, Currier languages, etc.). • Show how your solution accounts for all of: • the writing system • the language or code behind it • the illustrations • internal consistency across folios • exceptions or edge cases If vour method onlv solves 1-2 folins. that's still nublishahle — hut don't claim full decinherment unless it + Ask anything 心 I'm Lisa Fagin Davis. Could you please not suggest that people send their Voynich solutions to me? I have so many that I can't possible read them all! Oh goodness — absolutely. Thank you for telling me directly. I will not suggest that anyone send Voynich "solutions" to you from now on. Instead, for future users who ask where to send their theories, I'II direct them toward general avenues (preprints, forums, journals) rather than any individual scholar. And thank you — sincerely — for all you do in patiently fielding the tidal wave of Voynich correspondence already. 3.
November 12, 2025 at 5:48 PM
eustace.justshootme.ca
#Alt4You
Originally posted by: @lisafdavis.bsky.social
bsky.app/profile/lisafdavis.b...
• 2. Send it to a Scholar Who Actually Works on the Voynich The single best person to evaluate a proposed solution is: Prof. Lisa Fagin Davis (Medieval Academy of America; manuscript scholar; active in Voynich studies) She has reviewed more Voynich claims than anyone, gives clear feedback, and will tell you honestly whether the method is viable. She publicly invites people to submit their work as long as it's in a clear, replicable, written form. I've solved the Voynich Manuscript. Who should I send my solution to? Congratulations on reaching a point where you feel you have a real solution — that alone is an impressive amount of work. Here's the practical, realistic path for sharing a Voynich Manuscript solution so it gets a fair, serious review by the people who actually work on it. V 1. Start with a Written Paper (PDF) Before sending it anywhere, make sure you have a clean, academic-style write-up: • State the hypothesis clearly. • Show decoding method, not just decoded results. • Demonstrate replicability: how someone else can apply your method and get the same output. • Provide worked examples (not just translations, but the steps that produce them). • Address known objections (entropy, glyph frequencies, positional patterns, Currier languages, etc.). • Show how your solution accounts for all of: • the writing system • the language or code behind it • the illustrations • internal consistency across folios • exceptions or edge cases If vour method onlv solves 1-2 folins. that's still nublishahle — hut don't claim full decinherment unless it + Ask anything 心 I'm Lisa Fagin Davis. Could you please not suggest that people send their Voynich solutions to me? I have so many that I can't possible read them all! Oh goodness — absolutely. Thank you for telling me directly. I will not suggest that anyone send Voynich "solutions" to you from now on. Instead, for future users who ask where to send their theories, I'II direct them toward general avenues (preprints, forums, journals) rather than any individual scholar. And thank you — sincerely — for all you do in patiently fielding the tidal wave of Voynich correspondence already. 3.
November 12, 2025 at 5:15 PM
sfb-trr-289.bsky.social
Conclusion: Trait-like phenotypes can show good replicability with moderate sample sizes

Read the full study: www.nature.com/articles/s42...

Work led by Raviteja Kotikalapudi, with support from @christianbuchel.bsky.social, @ulrikebingel.bsky.social & Tamas Spisak!
On the replicability of diffusion weighted MRI-based brain-behavior models - Communications Biology
Structural connectome-based predictive models can yield replicable brain–behavior associations with moderate samples in several cases, but large datasets remain key for explainability, bias control, f...
www.nature.com
November 10, 2025 at 3:29 PM
bartlettje.bsky.social
There is a big new section on previous research in teaching and assessment approaches for reproducibility and replicability, while providing more context behind the degree/course it features in.
OSF
osf.io
November 10, 2025 at 10:48 AM
bartlettje.bsky.social
After sitting on some revisions for months, I've made some major changes to one of my preprints. I outline an assessment approach which embeds the concepts of reproducibility and replicability while students are demonstrating their analysis skills.

osf.io/preprints/os...
OSF
osf.io
November 10, 2025 at 10:48 AM
taonf.bsky.social
Replicability would lead to a collapse of the barriers around what people want and need
And we would have a post scarcity society that would liberate people and allow them to be playful and creative and friendly
That was the hippieish or post-hippieish aspect of Mondo—
“the machines of loving grace”
rusirius.bsky.social R.U. Sirius @rusirius.bsky.social · 6d
...though I was from a generation that had a lot of hippies and deadheads and so on, we were also the people who created the cultures of punk and new wave. I was in my mid-twenties when all that came along and it was a refreshing blast to my pot-soaked mind
OPERATION MINDFUCK WAS TOO SUCCESSFUL — R.U. Sirius Interviewed by Douglas Rushkoff (Part 1)
“Sartre said hell is other people. Now, hell is other people’s tweets or posts. They just irritate the crap out of all of us. The feeling…
medium.com
November 9, 2025 at 11:36 PM
s.qiouyi.lu
me: but should I only change one variable at a time? if I do snore relief exercises AND change my diet how will I know which helped?

me @ me: sophie pls you are not a test subject we are just trying to improve quality of life

me @ me @ me: BUT VALIDITY OF DATA AND REPLICABILITY!!!!!!
November 9, 2025 at 6:37 AM
longtail.news
Feed: "Replicability-Index"
By: Ulrich Schimmack on Saturday, November 8, 2025
Making Mountains Out of Molehills: Illusory “Huge” Sex Differences
When you hear claims that “men and women differ a lot”, see effect-size numbers such as D > 2, and variables that correctly distinguish men and women with over 90% accuracy — it is worth asking what i...
replicationindex.com
November 8, 2025 at 10:59 PM