Scholar

Aina Gallego

H-index: 25
Political science 50%
Economics 13%

Reposted by: Aina Gallego

didacqueralt.bsky.social
🚨🚨 New paper alert: Culture vs. Institutions

@ainagallego.bsky.social‬, Ana Tur-Prats and I have a new paper out in the JOP that examines the impact of historical family types on modern-day female political representation.

Reposted by: Aina Gallego

carloknotz.bsky.social
My department is *hiring a PhD* student (3 years, fully funded) for a research project on the social and political effects of AI-related technological change. *Deadline: May 4, '25*. See here for more information & to apply: www.jobbnorge.no/en/available... #PoliSky #Sociology #AcademicSky
PhD Fellowship in Politics & Social Sciences (266956) | University of Stavanger
Job title: PhD Fellowship in Politics & Social Sciences (266956), Employer: University of Stavanger, Deadline: Sunday, May 4, 2025
www.jobbnorge.no

Reposted by: Aina Gallego

mhaslberger.bsky.social
📢Special issue and workshop on "The Politics of AI: Citizen Perceptions, Preferences, and Priorities" 📢

We aim to bring together cutting-edge research on the political ramifications of AI for a workshop in Oxford and a special issue in a leading political science journal.(1/2)
ainagallego.bsky.social
🗓️ Submission deadline: February 28 🗓️
Join us to the workshop "The Politics of AI: Actors, Policy, Geopolitics, and Resistances" (Barcelona 2-3 October 2025).
Submission form: forms.gle/daA2S1qcSnxc...
Call for papers: www.ibei.org/en/call-for-...

by Anita GohdesReposted by: Aina Gallego

argohdes.bsky.social
“An effective strategy would combine legal, institutional, and civil resistance methods to advance the pro-democratic agenda. It would spell out a positive and optimistic vision for the country, rather than a defensive strategy.”
rebeccasolnit.bsky.social
"The best study on the subject in my opinion suggests that in the long term, institutions really can’t save us; that civil society and mass mobilization are a more potent check on a backsliding democracy in the long term..." meditations-in-an-emergency.ghost.io/the-nature-o...
The Nature of Our Power: A Conversation with political scientist Erica Chenoweth
By Rebecca Solnit • 8 Feb 2025
View in browser

"The best study on the subject in my opinion suggests that in the long term, institutions really can’t save us; that civil society and mass mobilization are a more potent check on a backsliding democracy in the long term than relying on institutional checks and balances alone." That's what political scientist Erica Chenoweth told me when I asked them if we could have a conversation (by email, below in full) about the current constitutional crisis/coup attempt and what we can do about it. Chenoweth is a hugely influential scholar of nonviolent social change, best known for their empirical research that not only documents what makes civil resistance work but demonstrates that it works, often extremely effectively. They direct the  Nonviolent Action Lab, which studies how people have built movements and developed strategies to resist authoritarianism successfully and documents how nonviolence can be effective. There's no one I wanted to hear from more in this constitutional crisis, and I'm grateful I can share their insights with all of you.
ainagallego.bsky.social
Please apply to the workshop "The Politics of AI: Actors, Policy, Geopolitics, and Resistances" (Barcelona, October 2-3). We seek empirical work on key actors, lobby and regulatory activities, and political conflict related to AI and Big Tech. Submission: forms.gle/o4rwT9km3iPX... by February 28.
Politics of Technology and AI Workshop -IBEI 2025
forms.gle
ainagallego.bsky.social
Positioning British party manifestos on the Economic policy dimension (left to right wing scale). The numbers next to the dots indicate the years of the manifestos (4/5)
ainagallego.bsky.social
Positioning Senators of the 117th Congress on the left-right ideological spectrum based on a random sample of 100 of their tweets (3/5)
ainagallego.bsky.social
Positioning tweets published by members of the US Congress on the left-right ideological spectrum: (2/5)
ainagallego.bsky.social
Please follow my brilliant coauthor @glemens.bsky.social , the soul of this project
ainagallego.bsky.social
An important caveat is that the scope of application of this approach is unclear without case-by-case validation. Our findings provide an important proof of concept that positioning political texts by "asking" an LLM and "averaging" the position ratings produces accurate position estimates. 6/7
ainagallego.bsky.social
Ideological scaling with LLMs has significant advantages over previous approaches
• Cost-efficient ($1.50 for 900 tweets vs. >1000$ human coding)
• Speed
• Scalability to diverse text types
• Reproducibility (with open LLMs like Llama or Mistral) 5/7
ainagallego.bsky.social
Our results show that position estimates correlate strongly (>0.90) with benchmarks based on expert coding, crowd workers, or roll-call votes. Moreover, this direct query approach outperforms traditional supervised classifiers like BERT trained on thousands of texts, especially for tweets! 4/7
ainagallego.bsky.social
We validated this method with:
• A random sample of 900 US Congress tweets published in 2023
• Positions of US Senators based on their published tweet
• UK party manifestos on economic/social policies
• Multilingual EU legislative speeches on subsidy policy 3/7
ainagallego.bsky.social
The approach is simple: we ask the LLM to evaluate where a short text (e.g., tweet or sentence) stands on a political scale such as a 0 to 100 left-right scale. We then average the ratings to obtain the position of longer texts (party manifestos) or political actors (US Senators). 2/7

Reposted by: Aina Gallego

claesdevreese.bsky.social
📍 No Paris agreement
📍January 6 pardons
📍Slashing DEI
📍 Border emergency
📍 DOGE created
📍 Unregulated AI
📍 Territory expansions announced

Just a few. And then of course TikTok quasi save and the Gulf of America 🇺🇸

Enjoy the morning coffee Europe 🇪🇺 ☕️ 👀

Reposted by: Aina Gallego

claesdevreese.bsky.social
In the executive order flurry: unregulated AI.

“Was it too much to ask AI developers for transparency regarding the safety testing of their products?” @alondra.bsky.social

thhttps://www.americanprogress.org/press/statement-caps-alondra-nelson-condemns-dangerous-repeal-of-ai-executive-order/
STATEMENT: CAP’s Alondra Nelson Condemns Dangerous Repeal of AI Executive Order
www.americanprogress.org

Reposted by: Aina Gallego

ainagallego.bsky.social
Thank you to all participants to the Workshop on AI & Politics at @cpoliticaub.bsky.social It was great to debate so much great work: aipsr.net/workshop-2-ai/
ainagallego.bsky.social
📢 Call for papers: Workshop on using LLMs and text-as-data in Political Science
Submissions: forms.office.com/e/5Y0XJErgxj
ainagallego.bsky.social
Hey, first post here :)
Gael Le Mens and I just uploaded a paper about scaling political text using ChatGPT. This approach is fast, cost-efficient, and reliable. We'd love to hear your thoughts and feedback!
Link: arxiv.org/abs/2311.16639

References

Fields & subjects

Updated 1m