Scholar

Alexander Cooley

Alexander A. Cooley is an American political scientist. He is Claire Tow Professor at Barnard College. He served as the… more

H-index: 27
Political science 81%
Sociology 11%
dhnexon.bsky.social
🧵 Fascism is an ideology. The government is fascist. But it's an unconsolidated competitive authoritarian regime, not a totalitarian one.

@justinscasey.bsky.social and I discuss this, and the heterogeneity of interwar fascism, here 👇
alexdukalskis.bsky.social
If you're in Dublin next week come join me & @cooleyoneurasia.bsky.social at the Institute of International & European Affairs (IIEA) on Thursday where we'll talk about our new book Dictating the Agenda: The Authoritarian Resurgence in World Politics

Details: www.iiea.com/images/uploa...

Reposted by: Alexander Cooley

alain-berset.coe.int
We are all students of democracy. Grateful for the exchange with students during my keynote and Q&A on The Age of Democratic Security.

Thank you to @columbiauniversity.bsky.social World Leaders Forum, Acting President Claire Shipman, & Prof. @cooleyoneurasia.bsky.social.

Reposted by: Alexander Cooley

dhnexon.bsky.social
And I talk about it towards then of @cooleyoneurasia.bsky.social and my essay on the crisis of liberal order. (sorry, I know I've posted this stuff before).
An excerpt from our 2022 article. It reads: "U.S. officials who sincerely wish to defend the liberal order will need to choose sides, both domestically and in the conduct of U.S. foreign policy. In doing so, they will blur the distinction between liberal and illiberal practices. They will need to break domestic norms, such as not modifying the size and jurisdiction of the federal judiciary because of its ideological disposition. They will also need to back away from post–Cold War norms, such as limiting favoritism toward political factions in and among major democratic allies. And they will need to do so with the clear understanding that these actions could backfire and provide rhetorical cover for illiberal and antidemocratic practices at home and abroad." The second excerpt reads: "Grappling with domestic illiberal threats remains a thorny exercise.
Of course, the defense of liberal democracy has produced terrible excesses in the past, including ugly repression and horrific violence.
U.S. officials adopted decidedly illiberal policies during the Red Scare that followed World War I, when the specter of Bolshevism loomed large. In trying to stem the rising right-wing extremist tide today, the United States risks returning to those dark times. But the alternative of inaction-Western liberalism's failure to beat back fascism in the 1930s—remains a dangerous prospect.
History is an imperfect guide. Fascism was defeated — at least for a time—on the battlefields of World War II. Had Hitler been less interested in military conquest, fascist states might be a perfectly normal part of the current global landscape. The Soviet Union, for its part, collapsed because of a combination of the inefficiencies of its command economy, nationalist pressures, and policy choices that turned out very poorly." The final excerpt reads: "The United States cannot really contemplate defeating its current authoritarian challengers in a total war, as that would likely produce a catastrophic nuclear exchange. Its most important authoritarian challenger, China, is a totally different kind of polity than the Soviet Union was. China is wealthy and relatively dynamic, and although it has its share of structural problems, it is not abundantly clear that it hortcomings are any worse than those of the United States.
In short, neither of the historical routes to the ideological victory of liberalism seems likely. This means that liberal democracies really do need to assume that they will not retake the catbird seat of the international order anytime soon. And so the question becomes not whether the liberal order will change but on whose terms."
alexdukalskis.bsky.social
Author copies for

Dictating the Agenda: The Authoritarian Resurgence in World Politics

by me & @cooleyoneurasia.bsky.social arrived today!

If you re-post this by Sept 30 we'll put you in a drawing & send the winner a free signed copy anywhere they happen to be on the planet.

Reposted by: Alexander Cooley

Reposted by: Alexander Cooley

ccottiero.bsky.social
New 5 Questions piece on the Illiberal Regimes and Global Governance project page! On the super interesting new book by @alexdukalskis.bsky.social & @cooleyoneurasia.bsky.social
ucigcc.org/research/fut... @ucigcc.bsky.social

Reposted by: Alexander Cooley

alexdukalskis.bsky.social
Nice review in Kirkus Reviews of my new book w/ @cooleyoneurasia.bsky.social (out next month) Dictating the Agenda: The Authoritarian Resurgence in World Politics

"A dispassionate argument proposing that the lights are going out."

www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews...
DICTATING THE AGENDA | Kirkus Reviews
Liberal democracy in danger.
www.kirkusreviews.com

Reposted by: Alexander Cooley

foreignaffairs.com
“The post-Soviet region is not turning out to be a decolonizing space; it rather has emerged as a laboratory for new forms of integration and regional networking,” writes Alexander Cooley.
Russia’s Hidden Empire
Moscow has rekindled its influence in the post-Soviet space.
www.foreignaffairs.com

References

Fields & subjects

Updated 1m