Casey Fiesler
H-index:
35
the ick I get at Sam Altman describing Sora as fanfiction... copyrightlately.com/openai-backt...
Sometimes I imagine what it might be like to teach an entire course on technology and intellectual property instead of just a single class. I feel like the students get the most absolutely chaotic but hopefully interesting brain dump from me in that class though haha.
If you click through a subtle link on results you do get to a decent disclaimer/warning from Westlaw, but wouldn't it be a good idea to FORCE users to see this (and to click "I understand") before using the tool? And also ideally an educational explanation for how it works and why it can be wrong?
But importantly, Westlaw makes no attempt to explain WHY it generates fictitious sources. There is zero attempt at education here, which I think is usually the case even when LLMs have disclaimers.
And again, I highly suspect that legal technology companies are downplaying limitations.
And again, I highly suspect that legal technology companies are downplaying limitations.
I just had a look at the Westlaw AI tool, blamed by one of the lawyers in the article (re: them not understanding at the time that it used AI and could generate fictitious sources). This is the disclaimer on the main page for the tool, but there's nothing included with generated results.
... I suspect even when not mentioned there is overtrust in AI here. As I mentioned in my original thread I think it's really important that lawyers are educated about the limitations of AI and sufficiently scared of hallucinations.
But this issue re: legal research AI tools is really concerning!
But this issue re: legal research AI tools is really concerning!
In a great piece of work @404media.co (via @jasonkoebler.bsky.social ) analyzed court records "where a lawyer offered a formal explanation or apology" for problematic AI use: www.404media.co/18-lawyers-c... There is more blame on overwork than lack of knowledge, though...
Dr. Casey Fiesler
@cfiesler.bsky.social
· Aug 12
Not even so much about the change, but the *timing* of announcing was borderline cruel for:
(1) Students who assumed they were eligible and have already been preparing materials
(2) Students who assumed they could apply next year and have to scramble to apply now
www.science.org/content/arti...
(1) Students who assumed they were eligible and have already been preparing materials
(2) Students who assumed they could apply next year and have to scramble to apply now
www.science.org/content/arti...
‘Completely shattered.’ Changes to NSF’s graduate student fellowship spur outcry
The announcement comes months later than usual, leaving many would-be applicants stranded
www.science.org
An informal poll for fellow academics: What is an appropriate/typical range for numbers of papers to review on an annual basis? Either pure numbers or e.g. proportionate to the number of papers that you submit per year. I'm curious what folks' heuristics are for this.
I'm working on some new standup material, and I have this joke about how thanks to my sadistic constitutional law professor who used cold calling and the socratic method I know way too much about constitutional law, and now every day since January has been a bad day.
Oh yeah to be clear this wasn't about FERPA. The question was about "demanding" that their own child show them their grades even if they expressed that they didn't want to.
I made the mistake on commenting on a random video I saw where someone was asking for opinions.
Anyway my opinion is that if parents choose to help their child pay for college, they are still not *entitled* to information about their *adult* child's grades. Apparently this is an unpopular opinion.
Anyway my opinion is that if parents choose to help their child pay for college, they are still not *entitled* to information about their *adult* child's grades. Apparently this is an unpopular opinion.
floating a thought for feedback:
if the liar's dividend is the benefit bad actors can receive from a world in which there is so much doubt about what is real and what isn't,
I was thinking about "the librarian's dividend" re: the value of the people and institutions who help us evaluate information
if the liar's dividend is the benefit bad actors can receive from a world in which there is so much doubt about what is real and what isn't,
I was thinking about "the librarian's dividend" re: the value of the people and institutions who help us evaluate information
I’m spending today at a big staff development event (few hundred people) for Arapahoe Libraries, focused on AI. I’m running sessions about ethics. Am really eager to get a sense of the vibe and what kinds of questions people have… (I also just love hanging out with librarians.)
At any given time I am usually reading one audiobook, one physical book, and one book on my kindle. This is a pretty good representation of the variety of my tastes at the moment. :)
I suspect the poster is probably asking about some specific form of AI. (Though if not I guess I’m pretty fond of the predictive algorithm on my insulin pump that’s helping to keep me alive.)
Though regardless I think people would just give very different answers to this question.
Though regardless I think people would just give very different answers to this question.
Ok I had literally not thought of writing off my standup classes on my taxes until this moment.
I had the random realization the other day that cold calling with the socratic method is basically the same as comedians doing crowd work.
This is a really interesting article about theologians' reactions to sensationalized AI-generated videos of Bible stories. www.npr.org/2025/09/07/n...
Some of the debate here re: the power of the original text makes me think of LLMs turning complex scholarly works into pithy podcasts.
Some of the debate here re: the power of the original text makes me think of LLMs turning complex scholarly works into pithy podcasts.
Fantasy or faith? One company's AI-generated Bible content stirs controversy
"The AI Bible is a way to really bring these stories to life in a way that people have never seen before. Think of if we were like, the Marvel Universe of faith," said one of the site's creators.
www.npr.org
Okay, confession. I did actually start writing this as a cozy(ish) mystery a few years ago, though only about a chapter. :) (Also should I start it up again now, this first scene would have to be quite different since I assume that the conversational robots would just be running on ChatGPT. 😭 )
So when it comes to fiction skewering academia (re: Katabasis) I feel obligated to remind you that I once tweeted the plot for an entire first season of an academic murder mystery.
Sometimes I think I should write this as a cozy(ish) mystery novel. :)
www.tumblr.com/cfiesler/187...
Sometimes I think I should write this as a cozy(ish) mystery novel. :)
www.tumblr.com/cfiesler/187...
Post by @cfiesler · 3 images
💬 1 🔁 69 ❤️ 153 · the tenure-track detective agency · I tweeted about a dream, then realized it should be a television show, so I tweeted the whole first season plot. Featuring an academic who ha…
www.tumblr.com
“Fewer people die in industry.” omg this book is killing me
Ok yep gotten that part and knew exactly what you were talking about!!
Only 8 pages into Katabasis so not really a spoiler…
But agreeing to give up 30 years of your life in exchange for a better shot at a tenure track job really puts the dark in dark academia. Or maybe it’s just peak regular academia.
But agreeing to give up 30 years of your life in exchange for a better shot at a tenure track job really puts the dark in dark academia. Or maybe it’s just peak regular academia.
haha yeah I guess it could be worse! and you're also right that "request from a library" is definitely a way to go!
And also I probably shouldn't say this publicly, but because I have a wider audience here, just to be clear I would not recommend this book as a purchase for most people. It is very academic and very expensive.
I am working on a new novel though. :)
I am working on a new novel though. :)
I am quite pleased with the cover. I just really did not want something that looked like this, which is a google image search for "technology law." PLEASE NO STOCK PHOTOS OF SCALES OF JUSTICE WITH BLUE DATA STREAMS.