Scholar

Elliot Gold

H-index: 5
Political science 38%
Law 32%

Reposted by Elliot Gold

Reposted by Elliot Gold

thebarcouncil.bsky.social
New blog: after a life threatening illness, criminal silk Jason Sugarman KC tried to claim on his insurance, but his claim was rejected on a technicality. He's urging all barristers to check their policies carefully. Read Jason's story: www.barcouncil.org.uk/resource/whe...
Head and shoulders portrait photograph of Jason Sugarman KC on a teal background. Text on a banner across the bottom reads: “Blog. When insurance fails: how I paid £80,000 for protection and got nothing”. The Bar Council logo is in the top left. White text on a teal background reads: “It felt like a slap in the face. I’d paid into this policy for decades, expecting it to be there when I needed it most. Now I was being denied help on a technicality. Jason Sugarman KC, Foundry Chambers”. There are large white quote marks at the top and bottom.

Reposted by Elliot Gold

tonydowson5.bsky.social
Interesting point here by Lord Sales on problems with an overly broad view of the rule of law:

"Inflating the concept of the rule of law conceals the underlying conflicts and hinders thoughtful debate about the trade-offs which are required"
elliotgold.bsky.social
Or possibly ‘he who receives god’ / ‘he who keeps holding god’, from the verb שרה, to keep / retain.
elliotgold.bsky.social
Israel was the name of Jacob, whose children were the Israelites. The country shares the same name as men called Israel, because it is named after the patriarch.

Reposted by Elliot Gold

carlgardner.bsky.social
Recently I've seen some JR cases whose titles are not in the usual R (Claimant) v Defendant format, eg: www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWH... and www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWH.... The recent Admin Court JR guide doesn't mention any change, and it's only happening in some cases. Does anyone know why?
You selected a file which is not on our system.
www.bailii.org

Reposted by Elliot Gold

lloydgash.bsky.social
This is a gem of a book on advocacy. Full of humour and solid advice, and has aged well.
"If [you need to be] sarcastic or even slightly rude, make sure you are right. To be rude and wrong is fatal, and it has been cynically said, is a privilege exclusively reserved for the Court of Appeal."

Reposted by Elliot Gold

finishedloading.bsky.social
Decisions on whether to prosecute, legal aid eligibility for asylum interviews, and regulation of sewage sludge - what do they have in common?

According to Fordham J, applying a “dual” variable intensity review to determine if they are irrational.

References

Fields & subjects

Updated 1m