Die "de minimis" vrijstelling is ooit ingevoerd als vorm van "administratieve vereenvoudiging".
Toont dat simplificatie ("cutting red tape") toch niet altijd in voordeel van bedrijven is.
www.standaard.be/economie/pak...
Reposted by: Ferdi De Ville, Stijn Oosterlynck, Kurt Vandaele
That number is misleading, as Smaghi explains. Lower intra-EU trade isn’t just about barriers but also consumer preferences for domestic products like food.
iep.unibocconi.eu/europes-inte...
Reposted by: Ferdi De Ville
Wat betekent dit akkoord voor de toekomst en geloofwaardigheid van de Unie?
@ferdideville.bsky.social voor #Zomerreeks #MakeEuropeGreatAgain #Mega2025
2000 miljard € is niet gelijk aan 1,26% van het Bruto Europees Product.
2000 miljard € / 7 (aantal jaren dat het MFF loopt) is gelijk aan ongeveer 1,26% van het Bruto Europees Product.
Einde bericht.
Reposted by: Ferdi De Ville
on.ft.com/4iqnU3J
And lunch was even (kind of) free!
Reposted by: Ferdi De Ville
Reposted by: Ferdi De Ville
Hoe dat precies moet? Dat leest u hieronder
He aims to hit 3 goals: onshoring production, raising revenue and extracting concessions.
But he faces a trilemma: these goals cannot be achieved simultaneously.
@koenverhelst.bsky.social @andybounds.bsky.social @alanbeattie.bsky.social
Aligning with US on China comes with negative effects on the economy and climate cooperation with China (5/6)
- deterrence: retaliating with tariffs on US exports
- diplomacy: making deals with Trump
- diversification: reducing trade exposure to US
But each strategy comes with risks (3/6)
- if tariffs decrease imports, they will not generate that much revenue, and will reduce US leverage over exporting countries
- if tariffs are used to extract concessions through deals, they will also not generate revenues, nor reduce the deficits (2/6)
For Trump, tariffs are like a Swiss Army Knife. They should:
- reduce trade deficits
- generate revenue to pay tax cuts
- provide diplomatic leverage (1/6)
The “America First Trade Policy” signed by Trump on the first day of his second term is less radical than expected. No new tariffs are introduced immediately; instead, only investigations are being launched that could potentially lead to future tariff increases. (1/5)
Ook in dat interview stonden vreemde kronkels, zoals deze 👇. Hoe zou Xi Putin kopiëren, door de zon dicht te draaien?
www.standaard.be/cnt/dmf20250...
Reposted by: Ferdi De Ville
Dit moet gepaard gaan met meer solidariteit, stelt Bea Cantillon.
www.sampol.be/2025/01/soli...
Vandaag twee dingen onthouden: koffie en chocolade.
www.nytimes.com/interactive/...