Scholar

James M. Bullock

H-index: 87
Environmental science 56%
Agriculture 16%
jmbecologist.bsky.social
But more importantly just waving the magic rewilding wand, and assuming all will be well, is dangerous
jmbecologist.bsky.social
I agree

But I’m concerned when people confuse the metaphor with reality

And believe that just by invoking ‘rewilding’ or ‘regenerative agriculture’ the job is done
jmbecologist.bsky.social
Rewilding & regenerative agriculture can be subject to semi-mystical musings

about nature healing itself, or suchlike

The only way they will help achieve nature recovery is by taking a hard-nosed approach to evidence about what works, in what circumstances
jmbecologist.bsky.social
Reintroductions of species are often framed around ‘hope’ in the media

In reality they are often the last resort after other conservation approaches have failed

But it is easier to get attention for reintroductions of charismatic animals rather than boring old habitat conservation
jmbecologist.bsky.social
People just felt: ‘Who is this person who doesn’t follow the same rules?You know, the environment is a nice thing, we can all agree and talk’

But I saw it as a fight against racism, a fight for human rights … a deeply political fight”

- Asad Rehman
www.theguardian.com/environment/...
Asad Rehman’s journey from antiracism campaigner in Burnley to head of Friends of the Earth
Climate crisis is ‘interconnected crisis of inequality’, says Rehman, who began organising at his school in the 1970s
www.theguardian.com

Reposted by: James M. Bullock

vincentwt.bsky.social
VWT is looking for a highly motivated person with proven leadership qualities, experience in charity governance and strong existing networks in the environment sector to lead its Board of Trustees and work in partnership with the CEO. More info + to apply by 21 Nov 2025, visit vwt.org.uk/vacancies
jmbecologist.bsky.social
Reintroductions can be sensible, especially under a rewilding ethos

But de-extinction is not!
jmbecologist.bsky.social
And so evidence alone will not bring change…
jensfoell.de
People are running stats on LLM-generated participants and think they’re being social scientists when in fact they’re technically just playing a very strange video game. This is like saying you’re doing math research because you’re playing sudoku.

www.science.org/content/arti...
AI-generated ‘participants’ can lead social science experiments astray, study finds
Data produced by “silicon samples” depends on researchers’ exact choice of models, prompts, and settings
www.science.org
jmbecologist.bsky.social
That does relate to the idea of top down control, which is also debated. So those are the stories told, but it is rarely that simple - eg the Yellowstone wolves story
jmbecologist.bsky.social
Technically that means they are ecosystem engineers

I’m saying that to illustrate the problem with such designations
jmbecologist.bsky.social
These are just animals that eat other animals or plants. An ecosystem is made up of a multiplicity of species’ interactions. So why choose particular ones?
jmbecologist.bsky.social
I think abundance has to mean biomass in this case or elephants get an unfair advantage
jmbecologist.bsky.social
I think many use the fact that a species has an impact on an ecosystem to say it is keystone

The paper says “we accepted the assertions the authors provided for keystone designation. We comment, however, on the criteria and associated evidence these authors brought to bear in such designations”
jmbecologist.bsky.social
My point is that many people use ‘keystone’ to describe their species of choice with little justification

In fact one could start asking, which species are *not* keystone if we use the term so loosely
jmbecologist.bsky.social
The analysis is rigorous but “we present here a comprehensive summary and descriptive analysis of keystones species, as *identified by others* in the relevant literature”
jmbecologist.bsky.social
“Identified as” doesn’t mean they are. The term is used very loosely, often applied to people’s favourite species!

Reposted by: James M. Bullock

nebriefing.bsky.social
Is your MP attending the definitive briefing on the climate and nature crisis?

Go to our bio, lookup your MP, email if they are not confirmed.

Then please SHARE this post 🔥
jmbecologist.bsky.social
Keystone species are generally defined as those that have a *disproportionately* large impact on their community or ecosystem relative to their abundance

So name me some that fit that definition, without mentioning beavers or termites

References

Fields & subjects

Updated 1m