Reposted by: John C. Besley
Our guest raised (at least) as many interesting questions as he answered ❔ Thank you, @johnbesley.bsky.social, for your visit. We learned that scientists should clearly state why they conduct their research & how society can benefit from it. Until next time! 🔜
#sciencecommunication #trustworthiness
#sciencecommunication #trustworthiness
Thank you for the opportunity to visit. I really enjoyed the time spent chatting about trust and trustworthiness with your excellent team.
Reposted by: John C. Besley
Scientific information does not flow into policy the way most scientists think. Twenty years after her jarring first day as a fisheries-biologist-turned-Senate-staffer, @sheril.bsky.social lays out what every scientist hoping to influence policy on the Hill needs to know: issues.org/information-...
by Mike S. Schäfer — Reposted by: John C. Besley
📢 Looking for #postdoc researcher on #sciencecommunication
➡️ researching communicators and/or effects
➡️ quantitative methods, e.g. surveys or experiments
➡️ 3-year position, can likely be extended
➡️ Deadline & more: see below
It this appeals to you - do apply!
If not: Pls pass it on! 🙏
➡️ researching communicators and/or effects
➡️ quantitative methods, e.g. surveys or experiments
➡️ 3-year position, can likely be extended
➡️ Deadline & more: see below
It this appeals to you - do apply!
If not: Pls pass it on! 🙏
Why is it an either/or framing? Why alienate golfers? Land is not scarce in the US (or UK?). There’s plenty of room for both and I worry this kind of framing exacerbates polarization (i.e., stirs up a fight that doesn’t need to be fought).