Financial Fair Play in the Premier League doesn't work and they should just get rid of it.
It was an incredibly poor performance and result. Terrible team selection, tactic and substitutions. Big call to start Hermansson which backfired. He’s under huge pressure now.
I can already say with some confidence West Ham are getting relegated this season. 2-0 down to Sunderland on day 1 and Potter brings on Callum Wilson and Andy Irvine. We lose 3-0.
As I said, Twitter is awful, a total cesspit. Bluesky is nice but boring, liberal people agreeing with eacher other. like being a Guardian reader in the 90s, although you didn't get punishment beatings for wrongthink then.
I'm not sure that would be very helpful if you were prosecuting these 2 people in a court of law.
I mean that if a bunch of left-wing liberals flee X to Bsky because X is too rightwing then follow a heuristic of "block jerks, don't feed trolls", it's a recipe for very boring ideological conformity. This is why Bluesky is boring and rapidly losing subscribers.
the big problem is when you move beyond banning what is unlawful (not itself unproblematic given many laws), how do you decide what can and can't be said? That is how you end up with Twitter banning women from saying there are only 2 sexes.
do you also think that banning legal speech is problematic, i.e. once the threshold moves beyond what is lawful?
And that pressure can result in lawful speech being banned, such as women expressing gender critical beliefs on pre-Musk Twitter. Making perceived harm the threshold is therefore highly problematic for free speech in a democratic society.
So who gets to decide whether these tweets, that you presumably selected as being egregious examples, are a "coded incitement to violence" or observations?
Haven't been on here for a while but popped over to take a look because Twitter is so awful. Some interesting discussions going on but I'm mostly struck by the rigid ideological conformity and thirst for punishing those who indulge in wrongthink. Should I try Threads?
Not defending them obviously but it kind of does make a difference in understanding the motivation in that mindless morons boo the opposition no matter the extent of the bad taste. I've witnessed it many times.
the obvious defence the people you have screenshotted would mount is that they aren't calling for terrorist violence but predicting it will happen.
It's rooted in complying with the law. But practically, trans-identifying women ('trans men') aren't the problem here, no man is going to care if they use the men's toilets. Alternatively, they can use mixed-sex toilets.
My, admittedly somewhat limited, experience of GPT-5 has not been good. Particularly weird that it didn't even know how to code API calls to itself.
Bloomberg News
@bloomberg.com
· Aug 9
OpenAI’s GPT-5 Met With Mixed Reviews, Confusion in First Day
For months, OpenAI Chief Executive Officer Sam Altman has been hyping up the capabilities of GPT-5, setting up the launch as a seminal moment for the company. But in the first 24 hours after its release, the new model was met with mixed reviews.
bloom.bg
Reposted by: Patrick Sturgis
For months, OpenAI Chief Executive Officer Sam Altman has been hyping up the capabilities of GPT-5, setting up the launch as a seminal moment for the company. But in the first 24 hours after its release, the new model was met with mixed reviews
OpenAI’s GPT-5 Met With Mixed Reviews, Confusion in First Day
For months, OpenAI Chief Executive Officer Sam Altman has been hyping up the capabilities of GPT-5, setting up the launch as a seminal moment for the company. But in the first 24 hours after its release, the new model was met with mixed reviews.
bloom.bg
by Patrick Sturgis — Reposted by: Brady T. West, Patrick Präg
New working paper with Tom Robinson, Laura Fung and Caroline Roberts. We use an LLM to classify occupations in surveys in real time, probing 'intelligently' when more info is needed. Results show big reductions in cost, time and respondent burden.
osf.io/preprints/so...
osf.io/preprints/so...
OSF
osf.io
Reposted by: Patrick Sturgis
👣 "Uncovering Digital Trace Data Biases: Tracking Undercoverage in Web Tracking Data" by Bosch et al. @orioljbosch.bsky.social @patricksturg.bsky.social Read: www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
Featured in our latest issue!
Featured in our latest issue!
Reposted by: Patrick Sturgis
New working paper with Chuyao Wang and Dan De Kadt, "AI labeling reduces the perceived accuracy of online content but has limited broader effects". The title is a concise summary but read the full paper for details: arxiv.org/abs/2506.16202
AI labeling reduces the perceived accuracy of online content but has limited broader effects
Explicit labeling of online content produced by artificial intelligence (AI) is a widely mooted policy for ensuring transparency and promoting public confidence. Yet little is known about the scope of...
arxiv.org
Interesting, I've never been to Reading.
these are what are called ad hominem arguments. Look it up.
Reposted by: Patrick Sturgis
On my way to London for #MASS25. Excited for two days of discussions on Mobile Apps and Sensors in Surveys. Shoutout to my fantastic co-organizers (for the 6th (!) time) @peterlugtig.bsky.social, @jkhoehne.bsky.social, Bella Struminskaya and generous local host @patricksturg.bsky.social
two men are standing next to each other in a kitchen and one of them says " london baby "
ALT: two men are standing next to each other in a kitchen and one of them says " london baby "
media.tenor.com
Reposted by: Patrick Sturgis
🤖 Recent advances in AI are beginning to reshape how we design, implement, and analyse surveys.
@patricksturg.bsky.social will be sharing his expertise at UCL's AI for Survey Data Collection Methods and Data Analysis workshop on 9 July.
@clscohorts.bsky.social
@patricksturg.bsky.social will be sharing his expertise at UCL's AI for Survey Data Collection Methods and Data Analysis workshop on 9 July.
@clscohorts.bsky.social
