Scholar

Paul Spicker

Videos
H-index: 25
Political science 56%
Economics 12%
more

by Paul Spicker — Reposted by: Gráinne McKeever

paulspicker.bsky.social
If the i paper is right, 'lifting' the 2-child limit might be for working families only, or a 3-child limit. Neither is good enough. Both exclude some of the poorest children. Both impose a penalty for blending families. And both call for questions about rape.
2 2

by Paul Spicker

paulspicker.bsky.social
Do you mean you can teach without first having to move the furniture?
6

by Paul Spicker

paulspicker.bsky.social
In "What is the welfare state for?", I argued that welfare provision is now the norm for all governments. bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/trade/what-i... A new report from the ILO on social justice researchrepository.ilo.org/view/deliver...
shows less poverty, less inequality, better social provision.
researchrepository.ilo.org
1

by Paul Spicker

paulspicker.bsky.social
There are many such critiques - here are two of mine.

*What is the welfare state for?* (2025) is about welfare states round the world, bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/trade/what-i...

*How to fix the welfare state* (2022) policy.bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/how-to-fix-t... is about Britain.

by Paul Spicker

paulspicker.bsky.social
The EU is consulting on anti-poverty strategy. ec.europa.eu/info/law/bet... They see that poverty is multi-dimensional (correct) and plan to look at intergenerational continuity (largely a myth. Longitudinal studies point to 3 main predictors: education, partnering and the state of the economy.)
European Commission - Have your say
European Commission - Have your say
ec.europa.eu

by Paul Spicker

paulspicker.bsky.social
I'm not sure where the figure of 6.5 million people on 'out of work' benefits comes from, but mainly it's 1.6m on "unemployment benefits" and 3.5 m on "incapacity benefits" (www.gov.uk/government/p...) Incapacity means it is "not reasonable" to expect claimants to work: Welfare Reform Act 2012.
Benefit expenditure and caseload tables 2025
Historic and forecast benefit expenditure and caseload data usually consistent with the annual spring and autumn Budgets or Statements.
www.gov.uk
1 2

by Paul Spicker

paulspicker.bsky.social
The debate over #gerrymandering reveals a major difference between US and European democracy. The US approach (Federalist 46) is meant to subordinate local interests to national priorities. The European ideal is to treat each constituency as an integral geographic community. Neither method works.
1 1

by Paul Spicker

paulspicker.bsky.social
Jonathan presents it as I was taught it. Managing the economy has to be thought about in a different way to balancing the public finances. tinyurl/bdeecy93
1

by Paul Spicker

paulspicker.bsky.social
'Welfare' and 'pensions' are transfer payments: the money is still there, in the economy, it's just being moved. We ought to account for them differently.
1 4

by Paul Spicker

paulspicker.bsky.social
No, it doesn't. According to the article, the UK Foreign Office told him that he was now on the USA's list of potential sanctions: 'il figure sur la liste des fonctionnaires de la CPI susceptibles d'être sanctionnés par la nouvelle administration américaine."
1

Reposted by: Paul Spicker

helenlp.bsky.social
The debate around disability benefits in the UK is loaded with misinformation and misunderstanding. ESA is an out of work benefit, PIP and DLA are in work benefits. They are supposed to help disabled people meet extra costs of being disabled, which can be substantial. What kinds of costs? Read on.
1 10 39

Reposted by: Paul Spicker

shrinkatlarge.bsky.social
Call me old-fashioned, but I don’t think LCWRA cuts should be ignored by MPs cos PIP is a more memorable acronym.
11 52

by Paul Spicker

paulspicker.bsky.social
In 1951, Harold Wilson and Barbara Castle joined Nye Bevan, resigning in protest against the Labour government's introduction of NHS charges. Whatever happened to them?
1 1 4

by Paul Spicker

paulspicker.bsky.social
The OECD's "Pensions at a glance" reports % of GDP accounted for by public and private provision.

Reposted by: Paul Spicker

by Paul Spicker

paulspicker.bsky.social
Unfortunately, you're absolutely right. The government are so fixated on disability that they have forgotten what sickness benefits are supposed to do. I wrote this two years ago:

observant-paulspicker.wordpress.com/2023/03/15/t...
shrinkatlarge.bsky.social
Dr Jay Watts (they/she) @shrinkatlarge.bsky.social · Jul 2
Call me old-fashioned, but I don’t think LCWRA cuts should be ignored by MPs cos PIP is a more memorable acronym.
2

Reposted by: Paul Spicker

by Paul Spicker

paulspicker.bsky.social
There are still things that might be done with PIP. Uncouple Mobility Allowance. Revive SDA. Reset extensions. Review assessments. But there's a basic problem: first, you need to understand what PIP is and how it works. The government doesn't.

by Paul Spicker — Reposted by: Gráinne McKeever

paulspicker.bsky.social
The public finance argument is not sound. Benefits are 'transfer payments'; when paid for by tax, they are redistributive, and any economic effects (presumptively neutral) are marginal. The decision to cut benefits is at root a decision not to redistribute - down to politics, not economics.
1 1

Reposted by: Paul Spicker

by Paul Spicker

paulspicker.bsky.social
* Copyright is not designed to protect creative work: it protects rights holders instead.
* IP laws are never just about creativity - they apply to science and data too.
* IP may impede creativity - eg intertexuality, pastiche.
* IP laws governing terms, succession and ownership are in a mess.
How copyright threatens academic communication
Wikipedia has announced that it will shut for a day, in protest about threatened restrictions in the USA which will enable rights-holders to shut down sites that breach copyright. My website, like …
observant-paulspicker.wordpress.com
2

Reposted by: Paul Spicker

francesryan.bsky.social
I’ve been making my way through the Welfare Reform Bill and this paragraph on the gov.uk website is genuinely disgusting.

Receiving a decent disability benefits rate “encourages sickness”, does it? Funny, I thought it just enabled severely ill and disabled people to eat.
Nearly 4 million households will also receive an income boost with the main rate of Universal Credit set to increase above inflation every year for the next four years – estimated to be worth £725 by 2029/30 for a single household 25 or over. This is around £250 higher than an inflation only increases. The Bill will also rebalance Universal Credit rates by reducing the health element for new UC claims to £50 from April 2026, fixing a system which encourages sickness by paying health element recipients more than double the standard amount.
47 330 700

by Paul Spicker

paulspicker.bsky.social
NIgel Farage has said he will buy everyone in one pub a drink if Reform wins the by-election: www.thescottishsun.co.uk/news/1488379... Treating voters is against electoral law on corrupt practice - as Farage must know, following a similar case www.theguardian.com/politics/201....
Nigel Farage backs Ukip candidate in sausage roll bribery row
Southampton Itchen candidate told to report to police accused of ‘treating’ after savouries were provided at event attended by snooker star Jimmy White
www.theguardian.com
1 2

by Paul Spicker

paulspicker.bsky.social
The key benefit for people with disabilities, PIP, is not means-tested; it doesn't 'only' go to people on low incomes. Together, the cut to WFP and the proposed cuts to PIP represent an attack on the core principle of universality. Consider that health and education are also universal services.
1

by Paul Spicker

paulspicker.bsky.social
A "large chunk" of the cut also fell on pensioners with modest incomes, and another 'large chunk" on those with low incomes. The distribution of pensioners' sources of income can be found at www.gov.uk/government/s....
1 1

by Paul Spicker

paulspicker.bsky.social
They didn't target the cut on rich pensioners. They took it from the basic pension. Benefits have to be judged, not by their title, but by how they add to final income; the cut reduced final annual income for every recipient of the state pension.
1 4

by Paul Spicker

paulspicker.bsky.social
dpacni.com/2025/05/03/d...

Their key points:

* Welfare spending is not out of control
* The tests are not easy
* It's not about fraud
* There's no disincentive to work
* Cutting benefits won't fix labour shortages
* Cuts won't help the economy
Disability and Social Security Myth-Buster
Welfare spending is not out of control It is lower than a decade ago and not set to rise within the next five years. What is true is that disability benefits as a share of overall welfare spending …
dpacni.com
1 4

by Paul Spicker

paulspicker.bsky.social
I've received the first copies of "What is the welfare state for?": details at bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/trade/what-i...

'Concise and superbly written" (Daniel Béland)

"A brilliant critical contribution and powerful overview about how we got here and what is at stake" (Camilo Pérez-Bustillo)
What is the welfare state for?
1

by Paul Spicker

by Paul Spicker

paulspicker.bsky.social
My new blog entry for Policy Press's "Transforming Society": www.transformingsociety.co.uk/2025/04/11/o...
On the incentive to be disabled - Transforming Society
Paul Spicker, author of 'What Is the Welfare State For?', highlights how ‘incentives’ are misused to shift blame onto individuals and justify benefit cuts, rather than tackling systemic issues.
www.transformingsociety.co.uk
1 3

References

Fields & subjects

Updated 1m