settle on the best option, given all considerations. I don't live in Maine and don't care about Mills one way or the other, but there is no inherent conflict in being willing to overlook a particular flaw in one candidate but finding insufficient reasons to do so with another.
That seems unduly simplistic. It would be entirely possible to see Sanders' age as a potential problem but believe he had sufficient other positive qualities (or his opponents had sufficiently negative ones) to endorse him anyway. Nobody is a perfect candidate, we all weigh the pros and cons and
The bane of the contemporary world is men who became unimaginably rich by being good at one thing - or, more often, just being lucky - and then become convinced that financial success is proof positive that they are transformational geniuses who understand everything better than anyone.
The vaccine thing runs off of replacing a real risk, but one that has become obscure because of the success of vaccines, with a pretend one. People are bad at understanding risk.
But with special ed, that isn't assessing and comparing risks. It's an immediate harm to their kids.
I would never blame someone for being, say, a Ravens fan, as horrible as the Ravens are, because you can't help where you are from. But Islanders, or Yankees, or Cubs? Man, there was another option right there.
The thing is, these parents are everywhere and evenly distributed throughout the population and communicate with each other. MAGA just created an activist core against itself in every community in America, red, blue or purple.
Why are you all talking about Diane Keaton? Please, please, make it just a Diane Keaton appreciation day. I am not sure if I can take it if she is dead.
They aren't trying to save money. They aren't trying to fight crime in Chicago. They don't genuinely think that there is an antifascist insurrection underway in Portland. These are lies. We all know they are lies. Stop pretending we don't know it.
But for some reason, headline writers keep treating the lie as if it is a good faith, if misguided, belief. It isn't. Nobody thinks it is. The guy who wrote the actual article you are producing the hed for doesn't: this is how he ends his essay.
This is about crippling the existing federal government to eliminate alternative power centers that could block the illegal elements of the MAGA project. And everyone knows it. Nobody out there believes this is about cost savings. That is a lie.
Headline writers: please stop granting the Trump administration's bullshit premises. They are not doing this for a rounding error's worth of savings. The way they have gone about it makes it very clear that they don't care at all about savings.
Like a buffet with someone carving prime rib at the end. More common for a wedding or bar mitzvah than a restaurant in the US, although I did work at a place that would have that setup on Sunday nights years ago.
One of the Julio-Claudian Emperors was nicknamed after the little boots he wore as a child on the march with the army, and we still call him by that name today.
Is it just a whole section of the country has decided to pretend - to the rest of us and to themselves - to believe something that can't possibly be true so they can further pretend that everyone who isn't being somehow paid off agrees with them?
