Florence Ashley
@floralashes.bsky.social
28K followers 3.3K following 22K posts
Transfeminine jurist and bioethicist | Ass. prof at the University of Alberta Faculty of Law | Clerked at Supreme Court of Canada | florenceashley.com | they/them/that bitch | ✡︎
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
floralashes.bsky.social
Ah yes. Though one may argue “bad” also often means “not for anyone.”
floralashes.bsky.social
Well, yes but I don’t think it’s as foundational? And in a weird way it often feels like the “Western” bros think Ancient Greece was Christians.
floralashes.bsky.social
I mean a demonstration of how the Cain and Abel analysis applies to modern war 😆
floralashes.bsky.social
I mean an analysis of how Cain and Abel applied 😆
floralashes.bsky.social
Mhm well, we need to also add the Jesus Chronicles but I’d say it’s not? To the extent that the very concept of “Western” hinges on the idea of Christian superiority and Christian civilization?
floralashes.bsky.social
Yeah, I think they do leave room for righteous non-us, although by the nature of the work they tend to be people who become us over the narrative. But you don’t really get a super consistent “anyone but us is bad” outside Ezra-Nehemiah and maybe Joshua and Samuel?
Reposted by Florence Ashley
indyfromspace.bsky.social
Academic articles can be written in a popular science writing style
rachelfeder.bsky.social
Tell me your most unhinged literary opinion, as a little treat
floralashes.bsky.social
But those aren’t, like, first names!
floralashes.bsky.social
True but I think there’s a distinction between “that’s just not us” and “this is bad”? I mean, Ishmael was given twelve nations too!
floralashes.bsky.social
Okay I need a demonstration.
floralashes.bsky.social
I didn’t feel that hunter-gatherer was *too* much in the bullseye. While not the ideal, it’s also not really framed as bad—as much flak as Esau gets, he’s not really shown doing anything wrong. L
floralashes.bsky.social
But let’s not give P too many props, because he’s a sexist turd. 😆
floralashes.bsky.social
This is so accurate. Just take the Torah. You wouldn’t know it from the translations, but it’s completely LOADED with puns. Both because they’re funny and because puns are really helpful ways to remember plot points and sequences of events.
scalzi.com
Most "classics" are boring as fuck to a modern reader in no small part because the context of the story is not understood by them and so many of the allusions and "inside jokes" known to then-contemporary readers have been lost in time and in translation
rachelfeder.bsky.social
Tell me your most unhinged literary opinion, as a little treat
floralashes.bsky.social
😆 Of course, and it’s very fair. But it’s social media so of course I’ll make every slight inaccuracy or missing nuance into a thing.
floralashes.bsky.social
In the story for sure, though there seem to be an assumption that there’s already people all around so if we’re considering the stories as separate ones stitched together, who knows!
floralashes.bsky.social
It’s not. They just kept the Hebrew.
floralashes.bsky.social
>Western literature

Okay well it’s kind of the foundational text of that so 😆
floralashes.bsky.social
Nope 😆 But not an unfunny one.
floralashes.bsky.social
There’s also some reasons to think the myth predates the identification of Adam and Eve as their parents and the first couple, so originally it may well not have been the first murder.
floralashes.bsky.social
I actually am not convinced that “first murder” would be enough of a reason for a myth like that. It doesn’t really do enough in terms of philosophical explanation or metaphysical source of evil thing for that, IMO. Plus, killing was omnipresent for Israelites so nothing that special.
floralashes.bsky.social
I don’t recall it being said it was the first city?
floralashes.bsky.social
(I’ll also point out that the ‘curse’ is to Eve herself, and it’s not clear to which extent it’s meant to be a general curse upon women. On the one hand, the pains of giving birth part seems forever. On the other hand, they did specify for the snake which would imply they’re not so unless stated.)
floralashes.bsky.social
Rather, it seems to be saying, “you’re going to simp for your husband so hard, you’ll be at his beck-and-call as though he was your ruler.”

So not an explicit justification of male supremacy, more a matter of horniness. And the solution is obvious: Lesbianism. ;)