foxes.bsky.social 🦊🏳️‍🌈
@foxes.bsky.social
1K followers 740 following 2K posts
North Virginia SCS @ CMU -> industry homecare/cleaning product & compsci nerd Avatar by Fleurfurr, banner by Mel Shaw https://twitter.com/soft_fox_lad He/him
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
foxes.bsky.social
i was exaggerating because it's funny. please don't actually do it and then hold it against me when you're disappointed
foxes.bsky.social
Tysm! Seems like the flap on the bottom: it completely stopped making a noise when I pressed down on it, and it started again as soon as I let go. I'll give it another try w/maintenance and just notify the guy that that's the case.
foxes.bsky.social
Someone please tell me why my toilet keeps making noise. My landlord keeps saying nothing is wrong with my toilet and it's not making any sound and I'm going to lose it if this continues for any more days
Reposted by foxes.bsky.social 🦊🏳️‍🌈
bradheath.bsky.social
WSJ: President Trump believed his Truth Social post demanding prosecutions of James Comey and other political foes was a private message to his attorney general, and "and was surprised to learn it was public."

www.wsj.com/politics/pol...
foxes.bsky.social
Losses from Bluetooth are just so low, and analog signal preservation is just that hard.

If AirPods' DACs don't seem to keep AirPods Max from having less distortion than $2,000 Sennheiser headphones, then I don't think you can call Bluetooth a limiting factor here.
foxes.bsky.social
from the other post. Adding the compounded errors together from AAC *and* the Hugo 2 itself (to do a wireless setup with an expensive DAC), then hooking up wired headphones to the Hugo 2, you're still moving audio over Bluetooth and getting quality than a different (still good) 100% wired setup.
foxes.bsky.social
I was responding to the claim that "a wired connection is going to outperform lossy AAC"

But we can still address this quantitatively: take the error from a wired connection to a nice, inexpensive DAC (see below), and your favorite extremely expensive Bluetooth-compatible DAC, like the Chord Hugo 2
foxes.bsky.social
you that maintaining perfect analog signal integrity in something like a smartphone or PC is impossible, and any audio engineer will tell you that the best lossy compression is practically transparent.

It's only conventional wisdom that's wrong, not professional wisdom.
foxes.bsky.social
What have you read on this? The folks over soundexpert.org/home got professional-grade measuring equipment, spending thousands on DACs, and measured how a signal was distorted after going through the DAC. They then measured distortion after going through a codec.

Any electrical engineer will tell
foxes.bsky.social
The 2nd post, directly below that one, compares the quality of those codecs to a $2,125 wired DAC's output.

Analog electronics are a nightmare. It is very unlikely that your analog output will be in an electrical environment that can compete w/an electrically isolated wireless product's.
foxes.bsky.social
The Chord Hugo 2 is a $2,175 DAC. It is very high quality.

For comparison, loss from Bluetooth codecs, in actually-challenging situations, e.g. encoding noise. Notice how in any situation w/human-perceptible loss, the expensive DAC does worse (often much worse) than high-bitrate Bluetooth codecs.
foxes.bsky.social
(Post 1/2)

It's not a matter of opinion. Apple's AAC codec is better than LDAC 990 (pic 1, pic 2), aptX, Android's AAC (by far), and any other similar Android codec.
Reposted by foxes.bsky.social 🦊🏳️‍🌈
foxes.bsky.social
They launched actual lossless, though the difference between "real" lossless and "very high" should be completely indistinguishable for human ears.
foxes.bsky.social
Apple AAC and Apple's DACs (their cheap 3.5mm USB C to 3.5mm DAC outperforming a lot of older, very expensive, huge DACs) will have less loss than a 3.5mm cable through a typical computer or wired DAC that has to deal with ground loops and such.
foxes.bsky.social
Out of curiosity, would you know anything of what happened to the DRACOs antiviral project off the top of your head? I never had the background to assess whether it was crankery, and it's hard to tell whether it hasn't gone anywhere because pharmaceuticals development is slow, or if it's just fake.
foxes.bsky.social
Journalists love entertaining and sensationalizing laws like "The Unpassable Journalistbait Bill Written Solely for Publicity Act of 2025"
Reposted by foxes.bsky.social 🦊🏳️‍🌈
Reposted by foxes.bsky.social 🦊🏳️‍🌈
hikoukihikouki9.bsky.social
It’s cool how the consensus in the US is only W-2 workers who rent should pay taxes
foxes.bsky.social
bacta tanks but horizontal and without the bacta
foxes.bsky.social
The Cortana UX on Windows Phone was gorgeous by the design standards of the time.

It just looked so nice on the Nokia OLED screens.