Konnor Rogers
@konnorrogers.com
3.1K followers 740 following 4K posts
dude on the internet
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
konnorrogers.com
Skattebo with the big brain move.

Takes the 15 yd penalty so he can run for more yards and get the 100yd game
konnorrogers.com
tough day at the office for the eagles
konnorrogers.com
thats like the 3rd time Daboll has smacked Dart on the helmet after the concussion protocol check...maybe don't do that 😅
konnorrogers.com
That throw by Russell Wilson was so bad I almost wish they called intentional grounding
konnorrogers.com
*pokes over at Eagles Giants*

27-17?!
konnorrogers.com
Kerkering about to spend the whole off season doing PFP...
konnorrogers.com
"My buddy is a good guy, he would never do anything wrong, he's always been good to me"
a picture of a happy family on a jet ski
konnorrogers.com
Time to pull out a burner 😅
konnorrogers.com
bsky.app/profile/konn...

They have a 2nd privacy policy attached that goes into more detail about what is shared and why and says it's applicable to the above policy. So I would agree it would be really hard to argue they could justify selling personal / private info.
konnorrogers.com
They do also collect gem data

rubygems.org/policies/pri...

^ is much more explicit and it seems like it can only be shared on the basis of being applicable to RubyGems and making the service better. So I *highly* doubt it could be construed as being able to sell your personal info based on above.
konnorrogers.com
Also worth noting the previous linked one says everything in the RubyGems.org privacy applies, so it'd be really hard to argue in my opinion they would be "right" to sell personal data. (Not a lawyer, just my opinion from reading both pages)
konnorrogers.com
They do also collect gem data

rubygems.org/policies/pri...

^ is much more explicit and it seems like it can only be shared on the basis of being applicable to RubyGems and making the service better. So I *highly* doubt it could be construed as being able to sell your personal info based on above.
konnorrogers.com
doesn't technically say they *will* sell it, but doesn't say they *won't* sell it either, and I can't find anything in there in regards to selling, and the "Service Provider" section doesn't mention anything about anonymization 🤷‍♂️ so the answer seems to be its at their discretion and applicable laws?
konnorrogers.com
> Anonymized and Aggregated Information

> We may share aggregate or de-identified information with third parties for research, marketing, analytics, and other purposes, provided such information does not identify a particular individual.
konnorrogers.com
Doesn't specifically say private, but Ruby Central policies
do state that it permits selling / sharing "personal" information in an "aggregated or de-identified fashion".

rubycentral.org/privacy-noti...
konnorrogers.com
Oh well. Better luck next year 🙃
konnorrogers.com
Gotcha. Also, I don't know if you're accepting additional proposals, but where would one propose "iOS Safari properly locking body scrolling like every other browser"?
konnorrogers.com
I'm curious why customized built-ins are on there, I had assumed the WebKit team had said "no" to that in favor of Custom Attributes? Or did I miss something?

github.com/web-platform...
konnorrogers.com
Follow up to my previous `tsx` struggle.

After coming down with the plague™️ for the last few days , i'm starting to feel about 80% better and somehow stumbled on the solution (don't ask me how I discovered the `build` option 😅)

github.com/privatenumbe...

Documented it in an issue and closed it.
konnorrogers.com
Anyone managed to get @playwright/test working with `tsx`, or am i asking for the impossible?

feels bad to be running everything else with tsx and then using Playwright's TS transformer.

And having to pull down babel/transformer to use `declare` is extra frustrating.
konnorrogers.com
yuupppp, just ran it...that is cursed.
konnorrogers.com
POUO

Plague of Unknown Origin