Lew Boo
lewboo12.bsky.social
Lew Boo
@lewboo12.bsky.social
45 followers 60 following 130 posts
Looking to be more involved in the current political and legal discourse. All conversations and debate are welcome!
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
The following contains a thread of the key points from the factual analysis of Jack Smith’s report. I cited page numbers of each comment within so it can be easier to find in the report if anyone wants to read more about a specific instance.

The full report: www.justice.gov/storage/Repo...
www.justice.gov
Reposted by Lew Boo
NEW: The Ninth Circuit's 2-1 Oregon National Guard order was just the start of getting to an answer.

Monday's order granting the Trump admin a stay pending appeal in the Oregon case changed nothing on the ground immediately. But, it did crystallize where we are at — and going.

Now, at Law Dork:
The Ninth Circuit's 2-1 Oregon National Guard order was just the start of getting to an answer
Monday's order granting the Trump admin a stay pending appeal in the Oregon case changed nothing on the ground immediately. But, it did crystallize where we are at — and going.
www.lawdork.com
Reposted by Lew Boo
Judge Graber closed with this plea: “Above all, I ask those who are watching this case unfold to retain faith in our judicial system for just a little longer.” We owe her, and other courageous judges who are upholding the rule of law in these dangerous times, that much. 22/23
Reposted by Lew Boo
“… It erodes core constitutional principles, including sovereign States’ control over their States’ militias and the people’s First Amendment rights to assemble and to object to the government’s policies and actions.” 20/23
Reposted by Lew Boo
Judge Graber summed up the stakes in her eloquent dissent: “Observers may be tempted to view the majority’s ruling, which accepts the government’s characterization of Portland as a war zone, as merely absurd. But today’s decision is not merely absurd. . . . 19/23
Parents brought the action against the school challenging policies related to what info they need to release to parents.

Case was thrown out w/o really reaching the merits in the lower courts and now denied at SCOTUS. Just kicks the can down the road until there is a “better” case to argue.
Seems like SCOTUS wants to be able to rule on this issue so he shows his displeasure that either the parties or lower courts are actively avoiding that question to keep it away from SCOTUS.

Sometimes avoiding the questions is “safer” than the standards that the SCOTUS/appellate ct’s rulings create.
People should expect politicians to act. But, pretending Dems have done nothing to oppose this admin and/or do nothing when elected is ridiculous.

But as my last post mentions people don’t want action they want their specific goals and anything else is failure even if it is impossible to achieve.
This would be a completely fine if it wasn’t for the broad sweeping impact of the emergency docket decisions.

Even if the issue has not been “finally resolved” they are creating rulings w/ no reasoning that they then expect lower courts to follow that “unofficially” overturn years of precedent.
It is both. It is favorable b/c a media company benefits from the news Trump creates so they would rather Rs in control.

Online Rs have unified top down messages while for the left it is more beneficial to criticize Ds than to promote D goals. Hard to be good when your “team” doesn’t root for you.
The “do something” is less of wanting action that leads to policy changes but is better phrased (at least online) as “do everything that I want immediately or I will scream you are the same as republicans and aren’t doing anything”
Biden admin actively fought anti trans legislation and enacted pro trans legislation just to be rewarded with blame for how they have caused republicans anti trans narrative and legislation.

These types of takes do actual harm to dem policy
His argument is not that trans rights wouldn’t be attacked no matter what. He blames Biden for R conduct.

He claims that Biden didn’t control R narratives or stop R states from enacting legislature. He uses this to blame Dems generally when they have no control over either.
Definitely going to be interested to see if this will extend to the “Kavanaugh stops” as district judges cite his concurring opinion.

Hopefully tying the judges to the absurdity of the opinions can get them to backtrack.

Strong callouts by judges and rule 11 enforcement is needed
Jeffries did endorse Wiley in the primary (in 2021) but I’m not seeing if after the primary he switched his endorsement to Adams. Doesn’t mean he didn’t switch but I just didn’t find it in my quick search.
Or are you saying this is the first time at least one of those listed didn’t endorse?

If that’s the case I misinterpreted your initial claim. I have just seen others focused on everyone needing to endorse
This doesn’t dispute what I said though right?

Schumer endorsed which is why I left his name off the list in my post. Jeffries/others aren’t in article/other link

I was asking b/c this is the first NY election that I’ve seen demanding everyone endorse. (Not from NY so don’t know what is the norm)
Has this always traditionally been the case that all NY related politicians have endorsed the NY mayoral candidate?

From what I found Gillibrand, Jeffries, Torres, and AOC did not endorse Adams in the 2021 mayoral election.

Maybe this is an incomplete list?

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2021_Ne...
2021 New York City mayoral election - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
Most of this is online outrage. It has never been the standard that every congress person needs to endorse every local election

Dems should always vote/support the left candidate but there are likely concerns of tying himself to Mamdani when he doesn’t have national support people claim he does
I know most commenting want Schumer to unilaterally change how govt works but his messaging is correct. Ds are dependent on Rs coming to the table and until they do to protect healthcare they should not budge.

His message on the floor and from other Ds is correct and shows the absurdity of Rs.
Reposted by Lew Boo
NEW: TX is asking NY courts to declare NY's reproductive health care shield law unconstitutional in an attempt to enforce its abortion ban across state lines. @law.ucla.edu's @lindsaywiley.bsky.social lays out a legal case for why NY (and other shield states) can and should reject such overreach.
New York Courts Should Reject Texas’s Attempt to Enforce its Abortion Ban Beyond its Borders
Precedent supports the refusal to enforce out-of-state civil judgments that punish an individual in the name of protecting the public. 
statecourtreport.org
Reposted by Lew Boo
A reminder that a shutdown that everyone demanded is about to start at midnight and right wingers have decided to message to win it, whereas the left has decided to continue talking about Chuck SChumer rather than right wingers.
Schumer and Jeffries need to resign from leadership immediately
Reposted by Lew Boo
Is it different than concerns on the national stage? I could see Harris not endorsing as somewhat payback for Mamdani’s lack of support for her

I know I saw some args where they discussed historically less endorsements nationally for city elections where the person isn’t associated w/ the candidate
I think the strategy should be endorse the left leaning candidate in all races. That being said although he is popular in NY, he doesn’t have the same popularity nationally. I’m sure those that are worried about endorsing are concerned it will be “used against them” in a national race.
Some of the issue is people don’t care enough to research & hear a unified message from Rs w/ no substance but is easy to understand

So the average person has a unified message on 1 side and a D message attacked by Rs & leftists on the other. So it’s easy to blame the party already being blamed