Peter Hall
@peterhall001.bsky.social
210 followers 160 following 17 posts

Breast Oncologist and Professor of Cancer Informatics, Edinburgh | Health Economics | Real World Evidence | https://cancer-data.ecrc.ed.ac.uk/

Sir Peter Geoffrey Hall was an English town planner, urbanist and geographer. He was the Bartlett Professor of Planning and Regeneration at The Bartlett, University College London and president of both the Town and Country Planning Association and the Regional Studies Association. Hall was one of the most prolific and influential urbanists of the twentieth century. .. more

Mathematics 45%
Economics 28%
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
peterhall001.bsky.social
Looking for collaborators to work on federated Real World Evidence studies related to cancer. We are building our infrastructure and need high value demonstaror projects. #OHDSI #EHDEN #OMOP #RWE please get in touch
cancerdataedin.bsky.social
DataLoch, in collaboration with ECi are proud to announce our membership of the UK RWE Network. Operated by HDR UK, we aim to prove the potential of Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) and the Common Data Model (CDM).

Find out more below👇🏼
t.co/rj89DIgT4b

Reposted by Peter Hall

Reposted by Peter Hall

healthfoundation.bsky.social
In this blog, Jack Elliott and Elaine Kelly examine trends in unpaid overtime among NHS staff since 2019 and consider the implications for future productivity.

Read more ⬇️
https://bit.ly/4mILY3C
Bar chart of total unpaid hours worked across the NHS, expressed as full-time equivalent staff, 2019 to 2024 showing unpaid overtime in 2024 equivalent to workload of at least 33,000 full-time staff.

Reposted by Peter Hall

statsepi.bsky.social
Target trial emulation is an important, useful idea, but we must remain careful to not allow novices to think it's a magical shortcut to causal inference. Nor can we lose sight of the *main* thing that separates randomized from non-randomized studies.
POTENTIAL RISKS OF TARGET TRIAL
TERMINOLOGY
There are risks that the term target trial emulation (TTE)
might mislead readers without methodological training. We
believe some readers may assume TTE represents a distinct
form of observational study design, rather than a framework
to help researchers identify and avoid self-inflicted errors in
observational studies. We are particularly concerned that
claims to have emulated an RCT will be mistaken for a claim
to have successfully emulated an RCT. The latter statement
implies that the inference is of a comparable standard to a
well-conducted RCT. To be certain, the TTE framework (2),
used correctly, will help investigators specify estimands,
and sidestep avoidable selection bias, but we are probably
more pessimistic than Schwarze et al. (1) about the ability
of ‘‘advanced methods’’ to address the threat of other
sources of bias. However, the difference in how
randomization accounts for confounding vs. ‘‘advanced
methods’’ like covariate adjustment, weighting, etc. is a
difference in kind, not in degree. This is because
randomization is guaranteed to eliminate confounding for
some key estimands, and to do so in a manner that
predominantly rests on our trust in a potentially verifiable
randomization process. In contrast, acting on the effect
estimate returned from an NRSI requires us to trust in the decisions and competence of the investigator, and even then,
no guarantee is possible, even in relatively simple sets of
relationships among a small set of potential covariates.
This distinction will be obvious to methodological experts,
but they only constitute a small proportion of researchers
and research-consumers

Reposted by Peter Hall

cancerdataedin.bsky.social
DataLoch, in collaboration with ECi are proud to announce our membership of the UK RWE Network. Operated by HDR UK, we aim to prove the potential of Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) and the Common Data Model (CDM).

Find out more below👇🏼
t.co/rj89DIgT4b

Reposted by Peter Hall

bharrap.bsky.social
Introducing my new #rstats package {kitchensink}

Not sure what the right model to fit is? Should you allow random intercepts, slopes, both? What do Bayesian methods say?

Just call {kitchensink::throw} to fit every possible model and see how your results differ!

Reposted by Peter Hall

cancerdataedin.bsky.social
We're hiring!
A vacancy has opened up in the team for the position of Post-Doctoral Research Fellow. 🔬 🧑🏼‍💻

If this sounds like something you'd be interested in, details can be found on our website below. 👇

cancer-data.ecrc.ed.ac.uk/2025/03/07/r...

Reposted by Peter Hall

cruk-si.bsky.social
Haven't registered your place for the Beatson International Cancer Conference 2025 yet? Find out what delegates had to say about last year's event

📅Register by 21 March: beatsonconference.org

#BICC2025

peterhall001.bsky.social
Annual versus less frequent mammographic surveillance in people with breast cancer aged 50 years and older in the UK (Mammo-50): a multicentre, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial - The Lancet www.thelancet.com/journals/lan...

Reposted by Peter Hall

elisabettabonzano.bsky.social
📌 Adjuvant Atezolizumab for Early Triple-Negative Breast CancerThe ALEXANDRA/IMpassion030 Randomized Clinical Trial

jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/…
@oncoalert.bsky.soci
al

Reposted by Peter Hall

cancerresearchuk.org
Together with the NIHR (National Institute for Health and Care Research), the EPSRC, Health Data Research UK (HDR UK) and ADR UK (Administrative Data Research UK), we’re announcing a £10m programme which will help identify individual cancer risk 🙌

Read more 👉 cruk.ink/42q0aaY
£10m funding for new programme to help identify individual cancer risk - Cancer Research UK - Cancer News
Today, Cancer Research UK, the NIHR and the EPSRC are announcing £10 million to create the Cancer Data-Driven Detection programme
cruk.ink

Reposted by Peter Hall

Reposted by Peter Hall

katiespencer.bsky.social
Are you a health economist, epidemiologist or data scientist with experience using routine healthcare data? Interested in equity in cancer care? Come and join this exciting @nihr.bsky.social funded project! Work with a range of stakeholders and build your skills. jobs.leeds.ac.uk/Vacancy.aspx...
Job Opportunity at University of Leeds: Research Fellow
Are you an ambitious researcher looking for your next challenge? Do you have a background in economics, econometrics, statistics, epidemiology or health data science? Are you interested in working wit...
jobs.leeds.ac.uk

Reposted by Peter Hall

breastdocuk.bsky.social
4w Denosumab or 12w

The efficacy results of the REDUSE study are not mature yet but the tox results are in

Less drug - fewer tox events

ONJ all grades 8.1 vs 5.2%
#SABCS24

peterhall001.bsky.social
The Sudlow Review on the challenges and opportunities for using UK linked healthcare data for research www.hdruk.ac.uk/helping-with...
www.hdruk.ac.uk

Reposted by Peter Hall

Reposted by Peter Hall

peterhall001.bsky.social
Any good starter packs out there for folks using routine healthcare data for cancer research? #oncsky #cancerinformatics #causalinference

Reposted by Peter Hall

owenjackson.bsky.social
🧵

New research published today by the OECD:

💷 #Cancer adds £14.4bn to annual UK #health expenditure - even accounting for other health costs those who don't get cancer go on to require

📈Without action, per capita costs could increase by >50% by 2050

1/

news.cancerresearchuk.org/2024/11/21/t...
The cost of cancer: what does it mean for the UK’s growth mission - Cancer Research UK - Cancer News
The OECD's report on the economic impact of cancer makes it clear the UK government needs to focus on tackling the disease.
news.cancerresearchuk.org

Reposted by Peter Hall

lshtm.bsky.social
Patients with #cancer favour evidence of success over quick drug approvals.

Ajay Aggarwal explains while offering patients new treatment options is crucial, survey suggests not all patients want faster cancer drug approvals without certainty they work. #PublicHealth

www.lshtm.ac.uk/newsevents/n...

peterhall001.bsky.social
This is a very thorough review!

Reposted by Peter Hall