Robbie Andrew
@robbieandrew.bsky.social
3.9K followers 150 following 2.7K posts

Senior scientist at Oslo-based CICERO Center for International Climate Research • 🌍Global Carbon Project • https://robbieandrew.github.io/

Environmental science 43%
Economics 15%
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs

robbieandrew.bsky.social
NOAA data show Mauna Loa was about to be deluged, but perhaps the US government shutdown has saved it just in time?
robbieandrew.github.io/ppm/
Graph showing: Weekly atmospheric CO2 at Mauna Loa, in the style of Hokusai.

robbieandrew.bsky.social
Update of the Global CCS Institute's report due out today, webinar starts in under an hour.
Global Status Report
www.globalccsinstitute.com

Reposted by Robbie M. Andrew

klimastiftelsen.no
Stans i elektrifisering av sokkelen betyr lite for kraftbalansen🔌Å nærme seg vedtatte mål for solkraftproduksjon og strømsparing er mye viktigere for kraftbalansen i Norge.

Det er en av mange poenger vår ferske tilnull kvartalsrapport. Les mer her: www.klimastiftelsen.no/aktuelt/ny-r...
tilnull kvartalsrapport 3 | 2025
En vellykket klimaomstilling handler om mye mer enn å kutte utslipp. En helt sentral komponent i omstillingen er det grønne energiskiftet. Derfor gjør vi et dypdykk i Norges energiskifte i denne kvart...
www.klimastiftelsen.no

robbieandrew.bsky.social
Well then you'd be unlikely to find gasoline that would be cheaper than that!

robbieandrew.bsky.social
US: How much it costs to drive an EV depends on where you charge (home or fast charger), electricity prices, and gas prices, and these last two vary a LOT by state. You can look up your own state here.
How Much It Costs to Drive an E.V. and a Gas Car in Every State
www.nytimes.com

robbieandrew.bsky.social
The credit is that emissions didn't go up. They still need to come down!

robbieandrew.bsky.social
With leap-year adjustment, that's 0.1%. So yes, flat.

robbieandrew.bsky.social
No, IEA is not leap-year adjusted (just checked). And it's +0.4% for energy plus industrial processes (i.e. an estimate of total).
Screenshot of a table from https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-review-2025

robbieandrew.bsky.social
Certainly. It's marked CC Attribution (bottom-left).

robbieandrew.bsky.social
Those 26 countries cover 85% of global cement emissions, but data lags vary widely.

robbieandrew.bsky.social
Probably somewhere -1% to +1%. China is down, but enough other countries are up (Egypt up >30% YTD!) that there's a lot of compensation. I have some 2025 data for 26 countries, and if I just use those directly, I get -0.7%. But China's annual is often closer to zero than monthly data suggest.

robbieandrew.bsky.social
Makes little difference for China, but CM includes international transport in each country's emissions totals here.

robbieandrew.bsky.social
That is indeed what some of us tend to say.

robbieandrew.bsky.social
And look at that. The development of MOFs wins the Nobel Prize for three scientists today.

robbieandrew.bsky.social
OK, so you're really arguing against things other than what I said!
Yes, the capacity growth thing doesn't seem to want to die. I share your pain.

Reposted by Robbie M. Andrew

robbieandrew.bsky.social
If one wind turbine goes offline, that's quite a different effect to one coal-fired power station going offline.
But my point was very minor, so I'm not sure why so much pushback here!

robbieandrew.bsky.social
Yes, obviously this is old tech and shouldn't be difficult. The point here is that even when people argue that it's the most reliable generation source, you can get these problems.

Reposted by Robbie M. Andrew

robbieandrew.bsky.social
"lenke i kommentarfeltet"???